Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RPD vs TENB vs QLYS vs VRNT vs SAIL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
RPD vs TENB vs QLYS vs VRNT vs SAIL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $448M | $2.47B | $3.34B | $1.24B | $6.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $859M | $1.02B | $685M | $894M | $1.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $-12M | $201M | $61M | $-297M |
| Gross Margin | 69.7% | 78.2% | 83.1% | 69.9% | 66.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | 2.9% | 33.7% | 8.6% | -16.4% |
| Forward P/E | 4.3x | 11.1x | 12.4x | 7.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.03B | $466M | $97M | $448M | $1.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $247M | $188M | $250M | $216M | $121M |
RPD vs TENB vs QLYS vs VRNT vs SAIL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rapid7, Inc. (RPD) | 100 | 23.7 | -76.3% |
| Tenable Holdings, I… (TENB) | 100 | 57.2 | -42.8% |
| Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) | 100 | 71.7 | -28.3% |
| Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) | 100 | 89.9 | -10.1% |
| SailPoint, Inc. (SAIL) | 100 | 51.0 | -49.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RPD vs TENB vs QLYS vs VRNT vs SAIL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RPD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, TENB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
QLYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.53
- 267.2% 10Y total return vs TENB's -28.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.41x
- Beta 0.53, current ratio 1.41x
VRNT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.36 vs QLYS's 0.64
- 1.6% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +17.9% vs RPD's -72.6%
SAIL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 23.2%, EPS growth 72.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.1%
- 23.2% revenue growth vs VRNT's -0.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.2% revenue growth vs VRNT's -0.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.4% margin vs SAIL's -29.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs SAIL's 1.81 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.9% vs RPD's -72.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.1% ROA vs SAIL's -4.0% |
RPD vs TENB vs QLYS vs VRNT vs SAIL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RPD vs TENB vs QLYS vs VRNT vs SAIL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QLYS leads in 3 of 6 categories
RPD leads 1 • TENB leads 0 • VRNT leads 0 • SAIL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QLYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TENB and QLYS operate at a comparable scale, with $1.0B and $685M in trailing revenue. QLYS is the more profitable business, keeping 29.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SAIL's -29.2%. On growth, SAIL holds the edge at +19.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $859M | $1.0B | $685M | $894M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | $72M | $241M | $127M | $42M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | -$12M | $201M | $61M | -$297M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $151M | $263M | $290M | $118M | $6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.7% | +78.2% | +83.1% | +69.9% | +66.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +2.9% | +33.7% | +8.6% | -16.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | -1.2% | +29.4% | +6.9% | -29.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +25.7% | +42.4% | +13.2% | +0.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.3% | +9.6% | +9.8% | -1.0% | +19.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | +106.3% | +10.1% | -5.1% | +85.4% |
Valuation Metrics
RPD leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.5x trailing earnings, QLYS trades at a 12% valuation discount to VRNT's 19.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), QLYS offers better value at 0.90x vs VRNT's 1.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $448M | $2.5B | $3.3B | $1.2B | $6.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $2.7B | $3.2B | $1.5B | $7.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.64x | -71.80x | 17.45x | 19.72x | -6.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.32x | 11.06x | 12.43x | 7.00x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.90x | 1.02x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.57x | 63.60x | 13.49x | 9.46x | 160.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.52x | 2.47x | 5.00x | 1.37x | 7.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.82x | 7.93x | 6.17x | 0.97x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.10x | 9.69x | 10.98x | 8.75x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
QLYS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QLYS delivers a 37.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-8 for SAIL. QLYS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RPD's 6.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VRNT scores 7/9 vs SAIL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.4% | -3.7% | +37.2% | +4.6% | -8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | -0.7% | +19.1% | +2.8% | -4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.1% | +0.2% | +47.5% | +5.3% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +0.1% | +37.8% | +5.9% | -2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.65x | 1.43x | 0.17x | 0.34x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $782M | $278M | -$153M | $233M | $926M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $247M | $188M | $250M | $216M | $121M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $466M | $97M | $448M | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.17x | 1.02x | — | 8.24x | -0.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
QLYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QLYS five years ago would be worth $9,694 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $892 for RPD. Over the past 12 months, VRNT leads with a +17.9% total return vs RPD's -72.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QLYS at -6.3% vs RPD's -48.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -53.0% | -5.2% | -27.5% | — | -35.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -72.6% | -31.2% | -25.6% | +17.9% | -33.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.9% | -41.1% | -17.7% | -39.3% | -44.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.1% | -41.9% | -3.1% | -56.1% | -44.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.6% | -28.8% | +267.2% | -37.1% | -44.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -48.0% | -16.2% | -6.3% | -15.3% | -17.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — QLYS and VRNT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QLYS is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAIL's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VRNT currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs RPD's 24.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 1.14x | 0.46x | 1.25x | 1.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.10 | $35.69 | $155.47 | $22.84 | $24.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.97 | $15.73 | $74.51 | $16.23 | $10.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.8% | +60.4% | +61.1% | +89.8% | +48.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 60.1 | 54.2 | 68.4 | 43.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 3.0M | 773K | 0 | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RPD as "Hold", TENB as "Buy", QLYS as "Hold", VRNT as "Hold", SAIL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 76.4% upside for SAIL (target: $22) vs 8.5% for QLYS (target: $103). VRNT is the only dividend payer here at 1.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.82 | $27.94 | $103.00 | $32.57 | $21.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 28 | 48 | 16 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.32 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +10.0% | +5.5% | +5.8% | +0.1% |
QLYS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RPD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
RPD vs TENB vs QLYS vs VRNT vs SAIL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RPD or TENB or QLYS or VRNT or SAIL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SailPoint, Inc.
(SAIL) is the stronger pick with 23. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 1% for Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT). Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) offers the better valuation at 17. 5x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RPD or TENB or QLYS or VRNT or SAIL?
On trailing P/E, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the cheapest at 17. 5x versus Verint Systems Inc. at 19. 7x. On forward P/E, Rapid7, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Verint Systems Inc. wins at 0. 36x versus Qualys, Inc. 's 0. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RPD or TENB or QLYS or VRNT or SAIL?
Over the past 5 years, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) delivered a total return of -3. 1%, compared to -91. 1% for Rapid7, Inc. (RPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QLYS returned +264. 7% versus SAIL's -44. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RPD or TENB or QLYS or VRNT or SAIL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus SailPoint, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning SAIL is approximately 260% more volatile than QLYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Qualys, Inc. (QLYS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 7% for Rapid7, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RPD or TENB or QLYS or VRNT or SAIL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SailPoint, Inc.
(SAIL) is pulling ahead at 23. 2% versus -0. 1% for Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Verint Systems Inc. grew EPS 271. 4% year-over-year, compared to -10. 0% for Rapid7, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SAIL leads at 33. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RPD or TENB or QLYS or VRNT or SAIL?
Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus -36. 7% for SailPoint, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QLYS leads at 33. 2% versus -21. 9% for SAIL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QLYS leads at 82. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RPD or TENB or QLYS or VRNT or SAIL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Verint Systems Inc. (VRNT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus Qualys, Inc. 's 0. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Rapid7, Inc. (RPD) trades at 4. 3x forward P/E versus 12. 4x for Qualys, Inc. — 8. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAIL: 76. 4% to $21. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — RPD or TENB or QLYS or VRNT or SAIL?
In this comparison, VRNT (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. RPD, TENB, QLYS, SAIL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RPD or TENB or QLYS or VRNT or SAIL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Qualys, Inc.
(QLYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), +264. 7% 10Y return). SailPoint, Inc. (SAIL) carries a higher beta of 1. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QLYS: +264. 7%, SAIL: -44. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RPD and TENB and QLYS and VRNT and SAIL?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RPD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TENB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QLYS is a small-cap deep-value stock; VRNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SAIL is a small-cap high-growth stock. VRNT pays a dividend while RPD, TENB, QLYS, SAIL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.