Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RSVR vs AMCX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
RSVR vs AMCX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $668M | $98M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $170M | $2.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $-140M |
| Gross Margin | 64.4% | 51.0% |
| Operating Margin | 21.7% | -3.0% |
| Forward P/E | 101.8x | 5.0x |
| Total Debt | $394M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | — |
RSVR vs AMCX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reservoir Media, In… (RSVR) | 100 | 97.0 | -3.0% |
| AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX) | 100 | 17.3 | -82.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RSVR vs AMCX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RSVR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.82
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth -17.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.7%
- 1.6% 10Y total return vs AMCX's -87.4%
AMCX is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (5.0x vs 101.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.6% revenue growth vs AMCX's -4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.0x vs 101.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.9% margin vs AMCX's -6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs AMCX's 0.86 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.3% vs AMCX's +29.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.0% ROA vs AMCX's -3.3%, ROIC 3.7% vs 12.1% |
RSVR vs AMCX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RSVR vs AMCX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RSVR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 13.7x RSVR's $170M. RSVR is the more profitable business, keeping 3.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMCX's -6.0%. On growth, RSVR holds the edge at +7.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $170M | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $66M | $686M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | -$140M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12.8B | $267M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.4% | +51.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | -3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | -6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +75.5% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.8% | -6.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -58.3% | -10.4% |
Valuation Metrics
AMCX leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AMCX's 0.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RSVR's 17.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $668M | $98M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $98M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 84.83x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 101.80x | 5.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.95x | 0.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.21x | 0.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.83x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 0.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RSVR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RSVR delivers a 0.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-12 for AMCX. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RSVR scores 6/9 vs AMCX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.0% | -12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | -3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.6% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.08x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $372M | $0 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | — |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $394M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.37x | 0.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RSVR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RSVR five years ago would be worth $10,069 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,813 for AMCX. Over the past 12 months, RSVR leads with a +39.3% total return vs AMCX's +29.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RSVR at 17.7% vs AMCX's -17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.1% | -7.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.3% | +29.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.9% | -44.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.7% | -81.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.6% | -87.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.7% | -17.6% |
Risk & Volatility
RSVR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RSVR is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMCX's 0.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RSVR currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs AMCX's 84.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.32 | $10.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.97 | $5.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.6% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.4 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 113K | 386K |
Analyst Outlook
RSVR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RSVR as "Buy" and AMCX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.0% upside for RSVR (target: $12) vs -6.5% for AMCX (target: $8).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.50 | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 40 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RSVR leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMCX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
RSVR vs AMCX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RSVR or AMCX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Reservoir Media, Inc.
(RSVR) is the stronger pick with 9. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX). Reservoir Media, Inc. (RSVR) offers the better valuation at 84. 8x trailing P/E (101. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Reservoir Media, Inc. (RSVR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RSVR or AMCX?
On forward P/E, AMC Networks Inc.
is actually cheaper at 5. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RSVR or AMCX?
Over the past 5 years, Reservoir Media, Inc.
(RSVR) delivered a total return of +0. 7%, compared to -81. 9% for AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RSVR returned +1. 6% versus AMCX's -87. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RSVR or AMCX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Reservoir Media, Inc.
(RSVR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus AMC Networks Inc. 's 0. 86β — meaning AMCX is approximately 4% more volatile than RSVR relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — RSVR or AMCX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Reservoir Media, Inc.
(RSVR) is pulling ahead at 9. 6% versus -4. 5% for AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX). Over a 3-year CAGR, RSVR leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RSVR or AMCX?
AMC Networks Inc.
(AMCX) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus 4. 9% for Reservoir Media, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RSVR leads at 22. 1% versus 5. 8% for AMCX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RSVR leads at 63. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RSVR or AMCX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AMC Networks Inc.
(AMCX) trades at 5. 0x forward P/E versus 101. 8x for Reservoir Media, Inc. — 96. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RSVR: 13. 0% to $11. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — RSVR or AMCX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is RSVR or AMCX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Reservoir Media, Inc.
(RSVR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RSVR: +1. 6%, AMCX: -87. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RSVR and AMCX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 38%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.