Entertainment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RSVR vs GOOGL vs AMZN vs AAPL vs NFLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Specialty Retail
Consumer Electronics
Entertainment
RSVR vs GOOGL vs AMZN vs AAPL vs NFLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information | Specialty Retail | Consumer Electronics | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $668M | $4.81T | $2.92T | $4.22T | $374.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $170M | $422.57B | $742.78B | $451.44B | $45.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $160.21B | $90.80B | $122.58B | $10.98B |
| Gross Margin | 64.4% | 60.4% | 50.6% | 47.9% | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | 21.7% | 32.7% | 11.5% | 32.6% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 101.8x | 29.6x | 34.8x | 33.8x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $394M | $59.29B | $152.99B | $112.38B | $14.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $30.71B | $86.81B | $35.93B | $9.03B |
RSVR vs GOOGL vs AMZN vs AAPL vs NFLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reservoir Media, In… (RSVR) | 100 | 97.0 | -3.0% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 435.6 | +335.6% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 169.2 | +69.2% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 217.8 | +117.8% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 165.8 | +65.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RSVR vs GOOGL vs AMZN vs AAPL vs NFLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RSVR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GOOGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 1.26, yield 0.2%, current ratio 2.01x
- 37.9% margin vs RSVR's 3.9%
- +163.5% vs NFLX's -23.6%
Among these 5 stocks, AMZN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AAPL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 0.4%
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs GOOGL's 10.0%
- 0.4% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- 34.0% ROA vs RSVR's 0.0%, ROIC 67.4% vs 3.7%
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- PEG 0.75 vs AAPL's 1.89
- 15.9% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.8x vs 33.8x), PEG 0.75 vs 1.89 | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs RSVR's 3.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs GOOGL's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +163.5% vs NFLX's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs RSVR's 0.0%, ROIC 67.4% vs 3.7% |
RSVR vs GOOGL vs AMZN vs AAPL vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RSVR vs GOOGL vs AMZN vs AAPL vs NFLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories
AAPL leads 2 • NFLX leads 1 • RSVR leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 4379.1x RSVR's $170M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RSVR's 3.9%. On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $170M | $422.6B | $742.8B | $451.4B | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $66M | $161.3B | $155.9B | $160.0B | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $160.2B | $90.8B | $122.6B | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12.8B | $73.3B | -$2.5B | $129.2B | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.4% | +60.4% | +50.6% | +47.9% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +32.7% | +11.5% | +32.6% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +37.9% | +12.2% | +27.2% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +75.5% | +17.3% | -0.3% | +28.6% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.8% | +21.8% | +16.6% | +16.6% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -58.3% | +81.9% | +74.8% | +21.8% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.9x trailing earnings, NFLX trades at a 59% valuation discount to RSVR's 84.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.06x vs AAPL's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $668M | $4.81T | $2.92T | $4.22T | $374.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $4.84T | $2.98T | $4.30T | $379.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 84.83x | 36.82x | 37.82x | 38.53x | 34.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 101.80x | 29.61x | 34.77x | 33.78x | 24.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.23x | 1.35x | 2.16x | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.95x | 32.22x | 20.47x | 29.68x | 12.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.21x | 11.95x | 4.07x | 10.14x | 8.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.83x | 11.72x | 7.14x | 58.49x | 14.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 65.72x | 378.98x | 42.72x | 39.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $0 for RSVR. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs AMZN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.0% | +39.0% | +23.3% | +146.7% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | +27.4% | +11.5% | +34.0% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +25.1% | +14.7% | +67.4% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.6% | +30.3% | +15.3% | +69.6% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.08x | 0.14x | 0.37x | 1.52x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $372M | $28.6B | $66.2B | $76.4B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $30.7B | $86.8B | $35.9B | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $394M | $59.3B | $153.0B | $112.4B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.37x | 392.15x | 39.96x | — | 17.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,069 for RSVR. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +163.5% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs RSVR's 17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.1% | +26.4% | +19.7% | +6.2% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.3% | +163.5% | +43.7% | +47.0% | -23.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.9% | +270.8% | +156.2% | +67.4% | +166.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.7% | +239.8% | +64.8% | +124.4% | +75.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.6% | +996.1% | +697.8% | +1174.1% | +875.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.7% | +54.8% | +36.8% | +18.7% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GOOGL and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 1.26x | 1.51x | 0.99x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.32 | $400.10 | $278.56 | $292.13 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.97 | $147.84 | $185.01 | $193.25 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.6% | +99.5% | +97.3% | +98.4% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.4 | 83.4 | 81.1 | 69.4 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 113K | 28.3M | 45.5M | 39.8M | 44.0M |
Analyst Outlook
AAPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RSVR as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). For income investors, AAPL offers the higher dividend yield at 0.36% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.50 | $406.28 | $306.77 | $317.11 | $116.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 82 | 94 | 110 | 99 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | — | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | — | 14 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 | — | $1.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% | +2.1% | +2.4% |
GOOGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). AAPL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
RSVR vs GOOGL vs AMZN vs AAPL vs NFLX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RSVR or GOOGL or AMZN or AAPL or NFLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) offers the better valuation at 34. 9x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Reservoir Media, Inc. (RSVR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RSVR or GOOGL or AMZN or AAPL or NFLX?
On trailing P/E, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the cheapest at 34. 9x versus Reservoir Media, Inc. at 84. 8x. On forward P/E, Netflix, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RSVR or GOOGL or AMZN or AAPL or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to +0. 7% for Reservoir Media, Inc. (RSVR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1174% versus RSVR's +1. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RSVR or GOOGL or AMZN or AAPL or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 288% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RSVR or GOOGL or AMZN or AAPL or NFLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alphabet Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to 22. 7% for Apple Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RSVR leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RSVR or GOOGL or AMZN or AAPL or NFLX?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus 4. 9% for Reservoir Media, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus 11. 2% for AMZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RSVR leads at 63. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RSVR or GOOGL or AMZN or AAPL or NFLX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) trades at 24. 8x forward P/E versus 101. 8x for Reservoir Media, Inc. — 77. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — RSVR or GOOGL or AMZN or AAPL or NFLX?
In this comparison, AAPL (0.
4% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. RSVR, AMZN, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RSVR or GOOGL or AMZN or AAPL or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, AMZN: +697. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RSVR and GOOGL and AMZN and AAPL and NFLX?
These companies operate in different sectors (RSVR (Communication Services) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and AAPL (Technology) and NFLX (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RSVR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 38%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.