Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RVMD vs MRSN vs ARVN vs BDTX vs TNGX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
RVMD vs MRSN vs ARVN vs BDTX vs TNGX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $30.30B | $145M | $652M | $155M | $3.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $33M | $263M | $70M | $62M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.37B | $-70M | $-81M | $21M | $-102M |
| Gross Margin | — | 99.1% | 99.5% | 99.9% | 97.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -203.1% | -44.0% | 16.9% | -178.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 7.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $159M | $29M | $9M | $15M | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $384M | $108M | $143M | $21M | $112M |
RVMD vs MRSN vs ARVN vs BDTX vs TNGX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revolution Medicine… (RVMD) | 100 | 409.5 | +309.5% |
| Mersana Therapeutic… (MRSN) | 100 | 6.2 | -93.8% |
| Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN) | 100 | 43.2 | -56.8% |
| Black Diamond Thera… (BDTX) | 100 | 9.0 | -91.0% |
| Tango Therapeutics,… (TNGX) | 100 | 226.6 | +126.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RVMD vs MRSN vs ARVN vs BDTX vs TNGX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RVMD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 1.08
- 393.1% 10Y total return vs TNGX's 129.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.08, Low D/E 9.7%, current ratio 7.14x
- Beta 1.08, current ratio 7.14x
MRSN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 61.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.8%
Among these 5 stocks, ARVN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BDTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 130.0% revenue growth vs RVMD's -98.6%
- 30.7% margin vs MRSN's -211.2%
- 13.8% ROA vs MRSN's -111.8%
TNGX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +19.4% vs ARVN's +52.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 130.0% revenue growth vs RVMD's -98.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs MRSN's -211.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.08 vs BDTX's 2.66, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.4% vs ARVN's +52.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.8% ROA vs MRSN's -111.8% |
RVMD vs MRSN vs ARVN vs BDTX vs TNGX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RVMD vs MRSN vs ARVN vs BDTX vs TNGX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BDTX leads in 2 of 6 categories
TNGX leads 1 • RVMD leads 0 • MRSN leads 0 • ARVN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BDTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARVN and RVMD operate at a comparable scale, with $263M and $0 in trailing revenue. BDTX is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MRSN's -2.1%. On growth, MRSN holds the edge at -12.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $33M | $263M | $70M | $62M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.4B | -$66M | -$111M | $12M | -$109M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.4B | -$70M | -$81M | $21M | -$102M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.1B | -$74M | -$276M | $21M | -$140M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +99.1% | +99.5% | +99.9% | +97.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -2.0% | -44.0% | +16.9% | -178.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.1% | -30.8% | +30.7% | -162.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -2.2% | -105.0% | +30.5% | -2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -12.6% | -84.0% | — | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -102.7% | +35.5% | -65.1% | +46.4% | +11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ARVN and BDTX and TNGX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30.3B | $145M | $652M | $155M | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30.1B | $66M | $517M | $149M | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -23.95x | -2.06x | -7.96x | 6.97x | -26.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 11.60x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.59x | 2.48x | — | 51.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.61x | — | 1.52x | 1.40x | 7.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 5.23x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BDTX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BDTX delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-5 for MRSN. ARVN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BDTX's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BDTX scores 6/9 vs RVMD's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -83.2% | -5.1% | -14.3% | +17.8% | -50.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -59.1% | -111.8% | -9.3% | +13.8% | -36.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -54.3% | — | -22.4% | +10.7% | -38.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -53.0% | -60.0% | -16.0% | +10.9% | -34.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | — | 0.02x | 0.13x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$225M | -$79M | -$134M | -$6M | -$79M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $384M | $108M | $143M | $21M | $112M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $159M | $29M | $9M | $15M | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -81.62x | -24.52x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TNGX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RVMD five years ago would be worth $48,210 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $754 for MRSN. Over the past 12 months, TNGX leads with a +1941.7% total return vs ARVN's +52.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TNGX at 89.7% vs MRSN's -46.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +80.3% | +0.1% | -11.2% | +9.2% | +162.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +278.4% | +257.7% | +52.8% | +75.5% | +1941.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +483.1% | -84.3% | -58.7% | +41.7% | +582.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +382.1% | -92.5% | -84.0% | -89.3% | +117.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +393.1% | -91.7% | -36.5% | -93.1% | +129.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +80.0% | -46.1% | -25.5% | +12.3% | +89.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RVMD and MRSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RVMD is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BDTX's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MRSN currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs BDTX's 55.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 2.22x | 1.15x | 2.66x | 1.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $155.70 | $30.39 | $14.51 | $4.94 | $28.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.00 | $5.21 | $5.90 | $1.49 | $1.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.5% | +95.7% | +70.2% | +55.1% | +82.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.4 | 79.0 | 42.6 | 54.2 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 0 | 808K | 744K | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RVMD as "Buy", MRSN as "Buy", ARVN as "Buy", BDTX as "Buy", TNGX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 194.1% upside for BDTX (target: $8) vs -65.6% for MRSN (target: $10).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $154.80 | $10.00 | $13.00 | $8.00 | $22.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 19 | 26 | 11 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +14.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BDTX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TNGX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
RVMD vs MRSN vs ARVN vs BDTX vs TNGX: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RVMD or MRSN or ARVN or BDTX or TNGX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tango Therapeutics, Inc.
(TNGX) is the stronger pick with 48. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN). Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc. (BDTX) offers the better valuation at 7. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Revolution Medicines, Inc. (RVMD) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RVMD or MRSN or ARVN or BDTX or TNGX?
Over the past 5 years, Revolution Medicines, Inc.
(RVMD) delivered a total return of +382. 1%, compared to -92. 5% for Mersana Therapeutics, Inc. (MRSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RVMD returned +393. 1% versus BDTX's -93. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RVMD or MRSN or ARVN or BDTX or TNGX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Revolution Medicines, Inc.
(RVMD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning BDTX is approximately 145% more volatile than RVMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 13% for Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RVMD or MRSN or ARVN or BDTX or TNGX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tango Therapeutics, Inc.
(TNGX) is pulling ahead at 48. 3% versus -0. 3% for Arvinas, Inc. (ARVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 130. 7% year-over-year, compared to -66. 2% for Revolution Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MRSN leads at 880. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RVMD or MRSN or ARVN or BDTX or TNGX?
Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc.
(BDTX) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 7% net margin versus -170. 9% for Mersana Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BDTX leads at 16. 9% versus -181. 1% for MRSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MRSN leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RVMD or MRSN or ARVN or BDTX or TNGX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is RVMD or MRSN or ARVN or BDTX or TNGX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Revolution Medicines, Inc.
(RVMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08), +393. 1% 10Y return). Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc. (BDTX) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RVMD: +393. 1%, BDTX: -93. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RVMD and MRSN and ARVN and BDTX and TNGX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RVMD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MRSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BDTX is a small-cap deep-value stock; TNGX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.