Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RWAY vs TPVG vs HRZN vs HTGC vs ARCC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
RWAY vs TPVG vs HRZN vs HTGC vs ARCC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $247M | $243M | $199M | $3.07B | $13.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140M | $97M | $40M | $547M | $3.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $32M | $-12M | $28M | $289M | $1.15B |
| Gross Margin | 78.5% | 83.5% | 18.0% | 87.2% | 75.7% |
| Operating Margin | 54.7% | 77.9% | -4.0% | 66.7% | 69.7% |
| Forward P/E | 5.0x | 6.5x | 6.1x | 8.4x | 9.9x |
| Total Debt | $450M | $469M | $473M | $2.30B | $15.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $20M | $106M | $57M | $924M |
RWAY vs TPVG vs HRZN vs HTGC vs ARCC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Runway Growth Finan… (RWAY) | 100 | 52.7 | -47.3% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 33.7 | -66.3% |
| Horizon Technology … (HRZN) | 100 | 25.8 | -74.2% |
| Hercules Capital, I… (HTGC) | 100 | 92.8 | -7.2% |
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 88.4 | -11.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RWAY vs TPVG vs HRZN vs HTGC vs ARCC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RWAY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 9.9% vs ARCC's 3.6%
- Lower P/E (5.0x vs 9.9x)
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs RWAY's 12.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs RWAY's 0.2% (lower = leaner)
- +19.3% vs HRZN's -23.2%
HRZN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 27.8%
- PEG 0.26 vs TPVG's 6.41
- Beta 0.70, yield 27.8%, current ratio 1.24x
- 27.8% yield, vs RWAY's 20.5%
HTGC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 171.6% 10Y total return vs ARCC's 139.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, current ratio 1.44x
- Beta 0.69 vs TPVG's 0.83, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, ARCC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs RWAY's 12.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.0x vs 9.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs RWAY's 0.2% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs TPVG's 0.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 27.8% yield, vs RWAY's 20.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.3% vs HRZN's -23.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs RWAY's 0.2% |
RWAY vs TPVG vs HRZN vs HTGC vs ARCC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HTGC leads in 3 of 6 categories
RWAY leads 1 • HRZN leads 1 • TPVG leads 0 • ARCC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HTGC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 78.6x HRZN's $40M. HTGC is the more profitable business, keeping 62.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HRZN's -6.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $97M | $40M | $547M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $75M | -$22M | $19M | $381M | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $32M | -$12M | $28M | $289M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $54M | $35M | $67M | -$352M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.5% | +83.5% | +18.0% | +87.2% | +75.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +54.7% | +77.9% | -4.0% | +66.7% | +69.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.3% | +50.6% | -6.6% | +62.1% | +41.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +132.9% | -58.7% | +141.5% | -77.8% | +36.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -2.3% | -29.6% | -20.7% | -63.9% |
Valuation Metrics
RWAY leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.3x trailing earnings, HRZN trades at a 58% valuation discount to ARCC's 10.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRZN offers better value at 0.18x vs TPVG's 4.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $247M | $243M | $199M | $3.1B | $13.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $679M | $691M | $567M | $5.3B | $28.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.34x | 4.91x | 4.30x | 8.86x | 10.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.95x | 6.50x | 6.10x | 8.41x | 9.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.84x | 0.18x | — | 0.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.84x | 9.13x | — | 14.54x | 13.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.76x | 2.50x | 4.97x | 5.61x | 4.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.52x | 0.68x | 0.60x | 1.44x | 0.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.32x | — | 3.51x | — | 11.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — RWAY and HTGC each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HTGC delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. RWAY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.93x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HRZN's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RWAY scores 7/9 vs ARCC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.7% | -3.4% | +9.0% | +13.2% | +8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | -1.5% | +3.6% | +6.4% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +7.2% | -0.2% | +6.6% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.5% | +9.4% | -0.2% | +8.8% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.93x | 1.33x | 1.49x | 1.04x | 1.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $432M | $449M | $368M | $2.2B | $15.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $20M | $106M | $57M | $924M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $450M | $469M | $473M | $2.3B | $16.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.69x | -1.02x | 0.60x | 4.34x | 2.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HTGC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARCC five years ago would be worth $14,704 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,724 for HRZN. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +19.3% total return vs HRZN's -23.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HTGC at 17.9% vs HRZN's -10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.8% | -6.3% | -26.7% | -10.6% | -4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.7% | +19.3% | -23.2% | +6.6% | +0.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.5% | -3.4% | -27.7% | +63.9% | +34.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.0% | -13.5% | -32.8% | +46.8% | +47.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.0% | +93.3% | +52.9% | +171.6% | +139.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.2% | -1.2% | -10.3% | +17.9% | +10.3% |
Risk & Volatility
HTGC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HTGC is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPVG's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HTGC currently trades 83.4% from its 52-week high vs HRZN's 53.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.83x | 0.70x | 0.69x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.41 | $7.53 | $8.46 | $19.67 | $23.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.36 | $4.48 | $3.80 | $13.70 | $17.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.9% | +79.5% | +53.3% | +83.4% | +81.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 58.3 | 58.5 | 64.7 | 56.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 599K | 504K | 1.2M | 2.5M | 7.5M |
Analyst Outlook
HRZN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RWAY as "Hold", TPVG as "Hold", HRZN as "Hold", HTGC as "Buy", ARCC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs 15.4% for HTGC (target: $19). For income investors, HRZN offers the higher dividend yield at 27.80% vs ARCC's 2.02%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $8.95 | $6.50 | $18.92 | $21.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 12 | 22 | 31 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +20.5% | +17.1% | +27.8% | +8.6% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.40 | $1.02 | $1.25 | $1.42 | $0.38 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
HTGC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). RWAY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
RWAY vs TPVG vs HRZN vs HTGC vs ARCC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RWAY or TPVG or HRZN or HTGC or ARCC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 8% for Runway Growth Finance Corp. (RWAY). Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) offers the better valuation at 4. 3x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RWAY or TPVG or HRZN or HTGC or ARCC?
On trailing P/E, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the cheapest at 4.
3x versus Ares Capital Corporation at 10. 2x. On forward P/E, Runway Growth Finance Corp. is actually cheaper at 5. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation wins at 0. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RWAY or TPVG or HRZN or HTGC or ARCC?
Over the past 5 years, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) delivered a total return of +47.
0%, compared to -32. 8% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HTGC returned +171. 6% versus RWAY's +6. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RWAY or TPVG or HRZN or HTGC or ARCC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hercules Capital, Inc.
(HTGC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 69β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 83β — meaning TPVG is approximately 21% more volatile than HTGC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Runway Growth Finance Corp. (RWAY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 93% versus 149% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RWAY or TPVG or HRZN or HTGC or ARCC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus 12. 8% for Runway Growth Finance Corp. (RWAY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation grew EPS 756. 3% year-over-year, compared to -50. 8% for Runway Growth Finance Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RWAY or TPVG or HRZN or HTGC or ARCC?
Hercules Capital, Inc.
(HTGC) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 1% net margin versus -6. 6% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — meaning it keeps 62. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -4. 0% for HRZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HTGC leads at 87. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RWAY or TPVG or HRZN or HTGC or ARCC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Runway Growth Finance Corp. (RWAY) trades at 5. 0x forward P/E versus 9. 9x for Ares Capital Corporation — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49. 4% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — RWAY or TPVG or HRZN or HTGC or ARCC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) offers the highest yield at 27. 8%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).
09Is RWAY or TPVG or HRZN or HTGC or ARCC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hercules Capital, Inc.
(HTGC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 69), 8. 6% yield, +171. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HTGC: +171. 6%, TPVG: +93. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RWAY and TPVG and HRZN and HTGC and ARCC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RWAY is a small-cap deep-value stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; HRZN is a small-cap high-growth stock; HTGC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Dividend Yield > 11.1%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.