Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RWTN vs RWT vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RWTN
Redwood Trust, Inc. 9.125% Seni

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.18B
5Y Perf.+0.4%
RWT
Redwood Trust, Inc.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$697M
5Y Perf.-9.0%
MFA
MFA Financial, Inc.

REIT - Mortgage

NYSE • US
Market Cap$995M
5Y Perf.-13.1%
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.62B
5Y Perf.+12.1%
NLY
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$16.08B
5Y Perf.+17.3%

RWTN vs RWT vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RWTN logoRWTN
RWT logoRWT
MFA logoMFA
AGNC logoAGNC
NLY logoNLY
IndustryREIT - MortgageREIT - MortgageREIT - MortgageREIT - MortgageREIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$3.18B$697M$995M$9.62B$16.08B
Revenue (TTM)$977M$1.06B$650M$3.46B$6.70B
Net Income (TTM)$-70M$-70M$135M$838M$2.03B
Gross Margin95.5%24.0%59.3%100.0%99.2%
Operating Margin77.5%24.1%41.0%107.1%102.6%
Forward P/E32.8x7.2x7.1x6.9x7.5x
Total Debt$22.29B$22.16B$10.99B$64M$111.86B
Cash & Equiv.$256M$256M$213M$505M$2.04B

RWTN vs RWT vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLYLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RWTN
RWT
MFA
AGNC
NLY
StockFeb 24May 26Return
Redwood Trust, Inc.… (RWTN)100100.4+0.4%
Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT)10091.0-9.0%
MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA)10086.9-13.1%
AGNC Investment Cor… (AGNC)100112.1+12.1%
Annaly Capital Mana… (NLY)100117.3+17.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RWTN vs RWT vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AGNC leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Annaly Capital Management, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. RWTN and MFA also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
RWTN
Redwood Trust, Inc. 9.125% Seni
The Real Estate Income Play

RWTN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.

  • Beta 0.59 vs RWT's 0.82
Best for: stability
RWT
Redwood Trust, Inc.
The REIT Holding

Among these 5 stocks, RWT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: real estate exposure
MFA
MFA Financial, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

MFA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 18.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.77, current ratio 2.18x
  • Beta 0.77, yield 18.4%, current ratio 2.18x
  • 18.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RWTN's 3.4%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
The Real Estate Income Play

AGNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 384.7%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.4%
  • 384.7% FFO/revenue growth vs NLY's 5.4%
  • Lower P/E (6.9x vs 7.5x)
  • +39.4% vs RWT's +7.9%
Best for: growth exposure
NLY
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

NLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 35.5% 10Y total return vs RWTN's 21.1%
  • 30.3% margin vs RWTN's -7.2%
  • 1.7% ROA vs RWTN's -0.3%, ROIC 6.4% vs -0.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAGNC logoAGNC384.7% FFO/revenue growth vs NLY's 5.4%
ValueAGNC logoAGNCLower P/E (6.9x vs 7.5x)
Quality / MarginsNLY logoNLY30.3% margin vs RWTN's -7.2%
Stability / SafetyRWTN logoRWTNBeta 0.59 vs RWT's 0.82
DividendsMFA logoMFA18.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RWTN's 3.4%
Momentum (1Y)AGNC logoAGNC+39.4% vs RWT's +7.9%
Efficiency (ROA)NLY logoNLY1.7% ROA vs RWTN's -0.3%, ROIC 6.4% vs -0.1%

RWTN vs RWT vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

RWTNRedwood Trust, Inc. 9.125% Seni

Segment breakdown not available.

RWTRedwood Trust, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MFAMFA Financial, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

AGNCAGNC Investment Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

NLYAnnaly Capital Management, Inc.
FY 2021
Bank Servicing
88.2%$57M
Interests In Mortgage Servicing Rights
11.8%$8M

RWTN vs RWT vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLRWTNLAGGINGNLY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — RWT and AGNC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

NLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.7B annually — 10.3x MFA's $650M. NLY is the more profitable business, keeping 30.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RWTN's -7.2%. On growth, RWT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricRWTN logoRWTNRedwood Trust, In…RWT logoRWTRedwood Trust, In…MFA logoMFAMFA Financial, In…AGNC logoAGNCAGNC Investment C…NLY logoNLYAnnaly Capital Ma…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$977M$1.1B$650M$3.5B$6.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$765M$266M$268M$3.7B$6.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$70M-$70M$135M$838M$2.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$5.8B-$10.1B$91M$604M-$222M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+95.5%+24.0%+59.3%+100.0%+99.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+77.5%+24.1%+41.0%+107.1%+102.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.2%-6.6%+20.7%+24.2%+30.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+5.9%-9.5%+14.0%+17.5%-3.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+184.3%+5.8%+118.9%+2.5%-8.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.5%+2.8%-103.0%+84.6%+79.5%
Evenly matched — RWT and AGNC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — MFA and AGNC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 5.8x trailing earnings, MFA trades at a 50% valuation discount to AGNC's 11.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AGNC's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RWT's 21.2x.

MetricRWTN logoRWTNRedwood Trust, In…RWT logoRWTRedwood Trust, In…MFA logoMFAMFA Financial, In…AGNC logoAGNCAGNC Investment C…NLY logoNLYAnnaly Capital Ma…
Market CapShares × price$3.2B$697M$995M$9.6B$16.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$25.2B$22.6B$11.8B$9.2B$125.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-41.10x-8.86x5.80x11.53x7.67x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.32.82x7.19x7.11x6.87x7.46x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.22x17.07x2.42x18.32x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue11.59x0.63x1.14x1.97x2.40x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.93x0.74x0.56x0.86x0.89x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.06x111.86x
Evenly matched — MFA and AGNC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — AGNC and NLY each lead in 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NLY delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-7 for RWTN. AGNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RWTN's 22.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MFA scores 5/9 vs RWTN's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricRWTN logoRWTNRedwood Trust, In…RWT logoRWTRedwood Trust, In…MFA logoMFAMFA Financial, In…AGNC logoAGNCAGNC Investment C…NLY logoNLYAnnaly Capital Ma…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-6.6%-6.6%+7.4%+7.3%+14.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.3%-0.3%+1.1%+0.8%+1.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.1%+3.9%+4.4%+34.0%+6.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.1%+6.1%+5.8%+4.9%+19.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–914555
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage22.68x22.56x6.01x0.01x6.92x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$22.0B$21.9B$10.8B-$441M$109.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$256M$256M$213M$505M$2.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$22.3B$22.2B$11.0B$64M$111.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.48x0.96x1.34x1.32x1.42x
Evenly matched — AGNC and NLY each lead in 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — AGNC and NLY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in RWTN five years ago would be worth $12,106 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,326 for RWT. Over the past 12 months, AGNC leads with a +39.4% total return vs RWT's +7.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NLY at 17.0% vs RWTN's 6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRWTN logoRWTNRedwood Trust, In…RWT logoRWTRedwood Trust, In…MFA logoMFAMFA Financial, In…AGNC logoAGNCAGNC Investment C…NLY logoNLYAnnaly Capital Ma…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+4.4%+1.9%+6.1%+2.5%+0.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+12.7%+7.9%+19.2%+39.4%+31.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+21.1%+31.6%+34.1%+58.3%+60.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+21.1%-16.7%-0.6%-2.2%+1.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+21.1%+11.5%+7.8%+46.9%+35.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+6.6%+9.6%+10.3%+16.5%+17.0%
Evenly matched — AGNC and NLY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

RWTN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

RWTN is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RWT's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RWTN currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs RWT's 80.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRWTN logoRWTNRedwood Trust, In…RWT logoRWTRedwood Trust, In…MFA logoMFAMFA Financial, In…AGNC logoAGNCAGNC Investment C…NLY logoNLYAnnaly Capital Ma…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.59x0.82x0.77x0.74x0.64x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$25.77$6.97$10.57$12.19$24.52
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.97$5.00$8.78$8.65$18.43
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.9%+80.1%+92.2%+87.9%+91.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.342.243.852.152.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded8K1.4M1.4M18.2M7.0M
RWTN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MFA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: RWT as "Hold", MFA as "Hold", AGNC as "Hold", NLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.5% upside for RWT (target: $7) vs 3.8% for AGNC (target: $11). For income investors, MFA offers the higher dividend yield at 18.36% vs RWTN's 3.44%.

MetricRWTN logoRWTNRedwood Trust, In…RWT logoRWTRedwood Trust, In…MFA logoMFAMFA Financial, In…AGNC logoAGNCAGNC Investment C…NLY logoNLYAnnaly Capital Ma…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$6.50$10.25$11.13$24.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts23223528
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.4%+13.6%+18.4%+14.7%+13.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11101
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.88$0.76$1.79$1.58$2.94
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.6%+7.4%+1.5%0.0%+0.1%
MFA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

RWTN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Risk & Volatility). MFA leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 4 tied.

Best OverallRedwood Trust, Inc. 9.125% … (RWTN)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RWTN vs RWT vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RWTN or RWT or MFA or AGNC or NLY a better buy right now?

For growth investors, AGNC Investment Corp.

(AGNC) is the stronger pick with 384. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY). MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — RWTN or RWT or MFA or AGNC or NLY?

On trailing P/E, MFA Financial, Inc.

(MFA) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus AGNC Investment Corp. at 11. 5x. On forward P/E, AGNC Investment Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — RWTN or RWT or MFA or AGNC or NLY?

Over the past 5 years, Redwood Trust, Inc.

9. 125% Seni (RWTN) delivered a total return of +21. 1%, compared to -16. 7% for Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AGNC returned +46. 9% versus MFA's +7. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — RWTN or RWT or MFA or AGNC or NLY?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Redwood Trust, Inc.

9. 125% Seni (RWTN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 59β versus Redwood Trust, Inc. 's 0. 82β — meaning RWT is approximately 40% more volatile than RWTN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 23% for Redwood Trust, Inc. 9. 125% Seni — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — RWTN or RWT or MFA or AGNC or NLY?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AGNC Investment Corp.

(AGNC) is pulling ahead at 384. 7% versus 5. 4% for Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGNC Investment Corp. grew EPS 1760% year-over-year, compared to -296. 9% for Redwood Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGNC leads at 26. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — RWTN or RWT or MFA or AGNC or NLY?

Annaly Capital Management, Inc.

(NLY) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 3% net margin versus -25. 5% for Redwood Trust, Inc. 9. 125% Seni — meaning it keeps 30. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NLY leads at 102. 6% versus -9. 7% for RWTN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGNC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is RWTN or RWT or MFA or AGNC or NLY more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, AGNC Investment Corp.

(AGNC) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 32. 8x for Redwood Trust, Inc. 9. 125% Seni — 25. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RWT: 16. 5% to $6. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — RWTN or RWT or MFA or AGNC or NLY?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) offers the highest yield at 18. 4%, versus 3. 4% for Redwood Trust, Inc. 9. 125% Seni (RWTN).

09

Is RWTN or RWT or MFA or AGNC or NLY better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Redwood Trust, Inc.

9. 125% Seni (RWTN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 59), 3. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RWTN: +21. 1%, RWT: +11. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between RWTN and RWT and MFA and AGNC and NLY?

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: RWTN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RWT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MFA is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NLY is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

RWTN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 92%
  • Gross Margin > 57%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RWT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 291%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MFA

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 59%
  • Net Margin > 12%
  • Dividend Yield > 7.3%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AGNC

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 122%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NLY

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 18%
  • Dividend Yield > 5.2%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform RWTN and RWT and MFA and AGNC and NLY on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(RWTN: 184.3% · RWT: 582.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.