Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RYM vs CAT vs DE vs SCI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Agricultural - Machinery
Personal Products & Services
RYM vs CAT vs DE vs SCI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Agricultural - Machinery | Personal Products & Services |
| Market Cap | $50M | $407.53B | $146.45B | $10.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $70.75B | $46.86B | $4.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $9.42B | $4.78B | $626M |
| Gross Margin | -5.7% | 32.5% | 35.4% | 26.2% |
| Operating Margin | -315.8% | 16.6% | 18.4% | 22.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 35.7x | 30.2x | 18.2x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $43.33B | $63.94B | $5.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $9.98B | $8.28B | $244M |
RYM vs CAT vs DE vs SCI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RYTHM, Inc. (RYM) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 479.0 | +379.0% |
| Deere & Company (DE) | 100 | 187.7 | +87.7% |
| Service Corporation… (SCI) | 100 | 149.1 | +49.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RYM vs CAT vs DE vs SCI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RYM plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
CAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.3%, EPS growth -14.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.4%
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs DE's 6.1%
- PEG 1.27 vs SCI's 3.20
- 4.3% revenue growth vs RYM's -36.1%
DE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, current ratio 2.31x
- Beta 0.57, yield 1.2%, current ratio 2.31x
SCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.08, yield 1.7%
- Lower P/E (18.2x vs 30.2x)
- 14.5% margin vs RYM's -5.0%
- Beta 0.08 vs CAT's 1.59
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.3% revenue growth vs RYM's -36.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.2x vs 30.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.5% margin vs RYM's -5.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.08 vs CAT's 1.59 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs DE's 1.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +150.7% vs RYM's -14.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs RYM's -38.2%, ROIC 15.9% vs -104.9% |
RYM vs CAT vs DE vs SCI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RYM vs CAT vs DE vs SCI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SCI leads in 2 of 6 categories
CAT leads 2 • RYM leads 0 • DE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RYM and SCI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 8061.4x RYM's $9M. SCI is the more profitable business, keeping 14.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RYM's -5.0%. On growth, RYM holds the edge at +109.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $70.8B | $46.9B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$25M | $14.0B | $10.3B | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | $9.4B | $4.8B | $626M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$26M | $11.4B | $3.8B | $629M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +32.5% | +35.4% | +26.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +16.6% | +18.4% | +22.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.0% | +13.3% | +10.2% | +14.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | +16.2% | +8.0% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +109.0% | +22.2% | +6.7% | +2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.2% | +30.2% | -1.4% | +65.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SCI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.8x trailing earnings, SCI trades at a 57% valuation discount to CAT's 46.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CAT offers better value at 1.66x vs SCI's 3.47x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $50M | $407.5B | $146.4B | $10.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30M | $440.9B | $202.1B | $15.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.61x | 46.51x | 29.31x | 19.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 35.71x | 30.19x | 18.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.66x | 1.80x | 3.47x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 32.73x | 18.99x | 11.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.16x | 6.03x | 3.28x | 2.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.91x | 19.27x | 5.66x | 6.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.67x | 45.33x | 18.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-4 for RYM. RYM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCI's 3.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCI scores 7/9 vs RYM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.8% | +47.5% | +18.2% | +39.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.2% | +10.0% | +4.5% | +3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -104.9% | +15.9% | +7.8% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -60.5% | +19.1% | +11.7% | +5.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.39x | 2.03x | 2.46x | 3.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | $33.4B | $55.7B | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $10.0B | $8.3B | $244M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $43.3B | $63.9B | $5.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -15.13x | 9.22x | 3.07x | 3.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $37,156 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8 for RYM. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +150.7% total return vs RYM's -14.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 62.0% vs RYM's -24.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.0% | +46.9% | +16.5% | -2.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.5% | +150.7% | +9.0% | -1.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.0% | +325.3% | +59.8% | +22.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +271.6% | +56.1% | +51.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +1168.6% | +608.5% | +207.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.0% | +62.0% | +16.9% | +6.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CAT and SCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SCI is the less volatile stock with a 0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 94.0% from its 52-week high vs RYM's 46.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 1.59x | 0.57x | 0.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.65 | $931.35 | $674.19 | $88.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.00 | $339.50 | $433.00 | $74.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.5% | +94.0% | +80.4% | +84.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.1 | 55.2 | 38.8 | 36.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 2.3M | 1.1M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
SCI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CAT as "Buy", DE as "Hold", SCI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.3% upside for DE (target: $690) vs -1.0% for CAT (target: $867). For income investors, SCI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.71% vs CAT's 0.67%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $867.33 | $690.00 | $93.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 53 | 46 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +1.2% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 8 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.86 | $6.33 | $1.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.3% | +0.8% | +4.4% |
SCI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). CAT leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
RYM vs CAT vs DE vs SCI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RYM or CAT or DE or SCI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the stronger pick with 4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -36. 1% for RYTHM, Inc. (RYM). Service Corporation International (SCI) offers the better valuation at 19. 8x trailing P/E (18. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RYM or CAT or DE or SCI?
On trailing P/E, Service Corporation International (SCI) is the cheapest at 19.
8x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 46. 5x. On forward P/E, Service Corporation International is actually cheaper at 18. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Caterpillar Inc. wins at 1. 27x versus Service Corporation International's 3. 20x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RYM or CAT or DE or SCI?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +271. 6%, compared to -99. 9% for RYTHM, Inc. (RYM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1169% versus RYM's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RYM or CAT or DE or SCI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Service Corporation International (SCI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
08β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 59β — meaning CAT is approximately 1864% more volatile than SCI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RYTHM, Inc. (RYM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 3% for Service Corporation International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RYM or CAT or DE or SCI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is pulling ahead at 4. 3% versus -36. 1% for RYTHM, Inc. (RYM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RYTHM, Inc. grew EPS 78. 2% year-over-year, compared to -27. 8% for Deere & Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAT leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RYM or CAT or DE or SCI?
Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus -431. 3% for RYTHM, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCI leads at 22. 6% versus -105. 5% for RYM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DE leads at 36. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RYM or CAT or DE or SCI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 27x versus Service Corporation International's 3. 20x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Service Corporation International (SCI) trades at 18. 2x forward P/E versus 35. 7x for Caterpillar Inc. — 17. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DE: 27. 3% to $690. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RYM or CAT or DE or SCI?
In this comparison, SCI (1.
7% yield), DE (1. 2% yield), CAT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. RYM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RYM or CAT or DE or SCI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Service Corporation International (SCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
08), 1. 7% yield, +207. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCI: +207. 3%, RYM: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RYM and CAT and DE and SCI?
These companies operate in different sectors (RYM (Industrials) and CAT (Industrials) and DE (Industrials) and SCI (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
CAT, DE, SCI pay a dividend while RYM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.