Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RYM vs LMND vs SCI vs ROOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Personal Products & Services
Insurance - Property & Casualty
RYM vs LMND vs SCI vs ROOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Personal Products & Services | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $52M | $4.23B | $10.78B | $791M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $821M | $4.33B | $1.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-44M | $-139M | $626M | $58M |
| Gross Margin | -5.7% | 47.6% | 26.2% | 28.6% |
| Operating Margin | -315.8% | -16.3% | 22.4% | 3.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 18.8x | 22.0x |
| Total Debt | $11M | $182M | $5.14B | $201M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $385M | $244M | $690M |
RYM vs LMND vs SCI vs ROOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RYTHM, Inc. (RYM) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) | 100 | 37.9 | -62.1% |
| Service Corporation… (SCI) | 100 | 154.1 | +54.1% |
| Root, Inc. (ROOT) | 100 | 15.5 | -84.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RYM vs LMND vs SCI vs ROOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RYM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 39.3%, current ratio 1.41x
LMND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 42.2%
- 40.2% revenue growth vs RYM's -36.1%
- +76.2% vs ROOT's -60.1%
SCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 1.7%
- 222.7% 10Y total return vs LMND's -20.7%
- Better valuation composite
- 14.5% margin vs RYM's -5.0%
ROOT is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.26, current ratio 2.62x
- 3.8% ROA vs RYM's -38.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% revenue growth vs RYM's -36.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.5% margin vs RYM's -5.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs LMND's 2.68 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.2% vs ROOT's -60.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.8% ROA vs RYM's -38.2% |
RYM vs LMND vs SCI vs ROOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
RYM vs LMND vs SCI vs ROOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SCI leads in 3 of 6 categories
ROOT leads 1 • RYM leads 0 • LMND leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 493.5x RYM's $9M. SCI is the more profitable business, keeping 14.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RYM's -5.0%. On growth, RYM holds the edge at +109.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $821M | $4.3B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$25M | -$121M | $1.2B | $71M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$44M | -$139M | $626M | $58M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$26M | $20M | $629M | $181M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +47.6% | +26.2% | +28.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | -16.3% | +22.4% | +3.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.0% | -16.9% | +14.5% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | +2.4% | +14.5% | +11.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +109.0% | +55.0% | +2.1% | +12.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.2% | +45.3% | +65.3% | +95.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ROOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.5x trailing earnings, SCI trades at a 19% valuation discount to ROOT's 25.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ROOT's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SCI's 11.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $52M | $4.2B | $10.8B | $791M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $32M | $4.0B | $15.7B | $302M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.64x | -23.92x | 20.45x | 25.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 18.83x | 21.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.59x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 11.93x | 5.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.42x | 5.73x | 2.50x | 0.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 7.40x | 6.77x | 2.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 19.45x | 4.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCI delivers a 39.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-4 for RYM. LMND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCI's 3.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCI scores 7/9 vs RYM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.8% | -26.5% | +39.4% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.2% | -7.4% | +3.4% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -104.9% | -36.8% | +11.3% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -60.5% | -22.7% | +5.6% | +3.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.39x | 0.34x | 3.14x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | -$203M | $4.9B | -$489M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $385M | $244M | $690M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11M | $182M | $5.1B | $201M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -15.13x | — | 3.78x | 3.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SCI and ROOT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCI five years ago would be worth $14,886 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11 for RYM. Over the past 12 months, LMND leads with a +76.2% total return vs ROOT's -60.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ROOT at 116.7% vs RYM's -24.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.6% | -27.6% | +1.1% | -20.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.5% | +76.2% | +4.7% | -60.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.6% | +238.3% | +24.2% | +918.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -22.6% | +48.9% | -66.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -20.7% | +222.7% | -88.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.9% | +50.1% | +7.5% | +116.7% |
Risk & Volatility
SCI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SCI is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LMND's 2.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SCI currently trades 87.7% from its 52-week high vs ROOT's 34.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 2.68x | 0.12x | 2.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.65 | $99.90 | $88.67 | $162.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.00 | $28.71 | $74.31 | $40.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.8% | +55.1% | +87.7% | +34.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.7 | 39.3 | 37.9 | 59.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 1.9M | 1.2M | 322K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LMND as "Buy", SCI as "Buy", ROOT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 33.0% upside for ROOT (target: $75) vs 19.7% for SCI (target: $93). SCI is the only dividend payer here at 1.66% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $71.83 | $93.00 | $75.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 10 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 12 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.29 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.3% | 0.0% |
SCI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ROOT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
RYM vs LMND vs SCI vs ROOT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RYM or LMND or SCI or ROOT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lemonade, Inc.
(LMND) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -36. 1% for RYTHM, Inc. (RYM). Service Corporation International (SCI) offers the better valuation at 20. 5x trailing P/E (18. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RYM or LMND or SCI or ROOT?
On trailing P/E, Service Corporation International (SCI) is the cheapest at 20.
5x versus Root, Inc. at 25. 2x. On forward P/E, Service Corporation International is actually cheaper at 18. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RYM or LMND or SCI or ROOT?
Over the past 5 years, Service Corporation International (SCI) delivered a total return of +48.
9%, compared to -99. 9% for RYTHM, Inc. (RYM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCI returned +222. 7% versus RYM's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RYM or LMND or SCI or ROOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Service Corporation International (SCI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus Lemonade, Inc. 's 2. 68β — meaning LMND is approximately 2150% more volatile than SCI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lemonade, Inc. (LMND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 3% for Service Corporation International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RYM or LMND or SCI or ROOT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lemonade, Inc.
(LMND) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -36. 1% for RYTHM, Inc. (RYM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RYTHM, Inc. grew EPS 78. 2% year-over-year, compared to 7. 6% for Service Corporation International. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROOT leads at 69. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RYM or LMND or SCI or ROOT?
Service Corporation International (SCI) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
6% net margin versus -431. 3% for RYTHM, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCI leads at 22. 6% versus -105. 5% for RYM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LMND leads at 40. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RYM or LMND or SCI or ROOT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Service Corporation International (SCI) trades at 18.
8x forward P/E versus 22. 0x for Root, Inc. — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ROOT: 33. 0% to $75. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RYM or LMND or SCI or ROOT?
In this comparison, SCI (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. RYM, LMND, ROOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RYM or LMND or SCI or ROOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Service Corporation International (SCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 1. 7% yield, +222. 7% 10Y return). Root, Inc. (ROOT) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCI: +222. 7%, ROOT: -88. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RYM and LMND and SCI and ROOT?
These companies operate in different sectors (RYM (Industrials) and LMND (Financial Services) and SCI (Consumer Cyclical) and ROOT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RYM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LMND is a small-cap high-growth stock; SCI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ROOT is a small-cap high-growth stock. SCI pays a dividend while RYM, LMND, ROOT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.