Consulting Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RYOJ vs CANG vs BABA vs JD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
RYOJ vs CANG vs BABA vs JD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consulting Services | Auto - Dealerships | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $21M | $272M | $325.19B | $44.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $3.46B | $1.01T | $1.31T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $-178M | $123.35B | $19.63B |
| Gross Margin | 38.5% | 13.6% | 41.2% | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | 7.3% | 10.9% | 0.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.1x | 4.0x | 1.5x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $170M | $248.49B | $107.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $1.29B | $181.73B | $149.72B |
RYOJ vs CANG vs BABA vs JD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 24.3 | -75.7% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 64.9 | -35.1% |
| JD.com, Inc. (JD) | 100 | 58.0 | -42.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RYOJ vs CANG vs BABA vs JD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RYOJ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, current ratio 1.42x
- Beta 1.01 vs CANG's 2.49
- 7.8% ROA vs CANG's -2.3%, ROIC 13.1% vs 4.6%
CANG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BABA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 76.0% 10Y total return vs RYOJ's -35.2%
- 12.2% margin vs CANG's -5.2%
- +3.1% vs CANG's -73.2%
JD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 3.3%
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth -52.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.8%
- Beta 1.04, yield 3.3%, current ratio 1.22x
- 13.0% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.5x vs 6.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs CANG's -5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs CANG's 2.49 | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BABA's 1.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +3.1% vs CANG's -73.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.8% ROA vs CANG's -2.3%, ROIC 13.1% vs 4.6% |
RYOJ vs CANG vs BABA vs JD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RYOJ vs CANG vs BABA vs JD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CANG leads in 1 of 6 categories
RYOJ leads 1 • BABA leads 1 • JD leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RYOJ and CANG and BABA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.31T annually — 113077.8x RYOJ's $12M. BABA is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CANG's -5.2%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $3.5B | $1.01T | $1.31T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $333M | $114.6B | $11.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$178M | $123.4B | $19.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $0 | $2.6B | $4.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.5% | +13.6% | +41.2% | +9.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +7.3% | +10.9% | +0.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | -5.2% | +12.2% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | -154.0% | +0.3% | +0.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +58.3% | +4.8% | +1.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +3.6% | -52.0% | -127.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CANG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.1x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 64% valuation discount to BABA's 17.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CANG's 3.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JD's 22.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $272M | $325.2B | $44.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29M | $107M | $335.0B | $38.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 6.14x | 17.07x | 16.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 4.00x | 1.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.42x | 3.90x | 12.94x | 22.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.83x | 2.29x | 2.22x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.45x | 2.02x | 1.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.05x | — | 28.26x | 63.35x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RYOJ leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RYOJ delivers a 68.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $68 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CANG. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RYOJ's 4.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RYOJ scores 8/9 vs JD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +68.2% | -4.1% | +11.2% | +6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.8% | -2.3% | +6.7% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.1% | +4.6% | +9.6% | +0.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.0% | +4.5% | +10.4% | +0.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.12x | 0.04x | 0.23x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | -$1.1B | $66.8B | -$42.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $1.3B | $181.7B | $149.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $170M | $248.5B | $107.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 24.08x | -1.87x | 15.74x | 10.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BABA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $9,668 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,071 for JD. Over the past 12 months, BABA leads with a +3.1% total return vs CANG's -73.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BABA at 17.7% vs RYOJ's -13.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.6% | -58.7% | -13.5% | +10.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.2% | -73.2% | +3.1% | -9.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.2% | +4.0% | +63.2% | -3.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.2% | -3.3% | -36.6% | -49.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.2% | -44.2% | +76.0% | +63.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.5% | +1.3% | +17.7% | -1.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RYOJ and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RYOJ is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JD currently trades 82.7% from its 52-week high vs RYOJ's 16.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 2.49x | 1.23x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.43 | $2.88 | $192.67 | $38.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.81 | $0.33 | $103.71 | $24.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +16.4% | +20.2% | +69.9% | +82.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.6 | 67.0 | 54.3 | 56.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 1.4M | 10.5M | 10.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CANG and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CANG as "Buy", BABA as "Buy", JD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 414.9% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 4.4% for JD (target: $33). For income investors, JD offers the higher dividend yield at 3.26% vs BABA's 1.33%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.00 | $194.23 | $32.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 59 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.3% | +3.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $12.14 | $6.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.9% | +4.0% | +7.0% |
CANG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). RYOJ leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
RYOJ vs CANG vs BABA vs JD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RYOJ or CANG or BABA or JD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cango Inc. (CANG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RYOJ or CANG or BABA or JD?
On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the cheapest at 6. 1x versus Alibaba Group Holding Limited at 17. 1x. On forward P/E, JD. com, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RYOJ or CANG or BABA or JD?
Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.
(CANG) delivered a total return of -3. 3%, compared to -49. 3% for JD. com, Inc. (JD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BABA returned +76. 0% versus CANG's -44. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RYOJ or CANG or BABA or JD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), rYojbaba Co.
, Ltd. Common Shares (RYOJ) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 49β — meaning CANG is approximately 147% more volatile than RYOJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 4% for rYojbaba Co. , Ltd. Common Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RYOJ or CANG or BABA or JD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for rYojbaba Co. , Ltd. Common Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, JD leads at 7. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RYOJ or CANG or BABA or JD?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus 1. 5% for JD. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus 0. 2% for JD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RYOJ or CANG or BABA or JD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) trades at 1. 5x forward P/E versus 4. 0x for Alibaba Group Holding Limited — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 414. 9% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RYOJ or CANG or BABA or JD?
In this comparison, JD (3.
3% yield), BABA (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. RYOJ, CANG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RYOJ or CANG or BABA or JD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), 3. 3% yield). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JD: +63. 4%, CANG: -44. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RYOJ and CANG and BABA and JD?
These companies operate in different sectors (RYOJ (Industrials) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical) and JD (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RYOJ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock; JD is a mid-cap deep-value stock. BABA, JD pay a dividend while RYOJ, CANG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.