REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SACH vs STWD vs BXMT vs RC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
SACH vs STWD vs BXMT vs RC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $53M | $6.82B | $3.23B | $357M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $38M | $1.89B | $1.54B | $499M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $412M | $104M | $-229M |
| Gross Margin | 98.1% | 57.2% | 62.6% | -0.0% |
| Operating Margin | 42.0% | 51.6% | 58.3% | -50.5% |
| Forward P/E | 28.1x | 10.0x | 12.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $278M | $22.20B | $16.16B | $5.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $499M | $453M | $248M |
SACH vs STWD vs BXMT vs RC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) | 100 | 38.1 | -61.9% |
| Starwood Property T… (STWD) | 100 | 136.1 | +36.1% |
| Blackstone Mortgage… (BXMT) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| Ready Capital Corpo… (RC) | 100 | 36.8 | -63.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SACH vs STWD vs BXMT vs RC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SACH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.44, yield 18.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.44, current ratio 0.84x
- Beta 0.44, yield 18.4%, current ratio 0.84x
- Beta 0.44 vs RC's 1.17, lower leverage
STWD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 83.4% 10Y total return vs BXMT's 50.5%
- Better valuation composite
- 21.8% margin vs RC's -45.8%
BXMT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 17.3%, EPS growth 45.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.2%
- 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs SACH's -18.2%
- 31.4% yield, vs BXMT's 9.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs SACH's -18.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.8% margin vs RC's -45.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.44 vs RC's 1.17, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 31.4% yield, vs BXMT's 9.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.0% vs RC's -44.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs RC's -2.6%, ROIC 4.8% vs 1.2% |
SACH vs STWD vs BXMT vs RC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SACH vs STWD vs BXMT vs RC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RC leads in 2 of 6 categories
SACH leads 1 • STWD leads 0 • BXMT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — STWD and RC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STWD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 49.9x SACH's $38M. STWD is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -45.8%. On growth, RC holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $38M | $1.9B | $1.5B | $499M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $17M | $1.0B | $948M | -$249M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $412M | $104M | -$229M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $957M | $335M | $303M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +98.1% | +57.2% | +62.6% | -0.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +42.0% | +51.6% | +58.3% | -50.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +21.8% | +6.7% | -45.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +50.6% | +21.8% | +60.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +145.2% | +12.9% | +4.0% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -79.9% | +114.3% | — | +24.9% |
Valuation Metrics
RC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.8x trailing earnings, STWD trades at a 51% valuation discount to BXMT's 29.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SACH's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RC's 48.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $53M | $6.8B | $3.2B | $357M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $320M | $28.5B | $18.9B | $6.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.06x | 14.80x | 29.92x | -1.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.04x | 11.98x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 14.60x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.33x | 18.87x | 16.35x | 48.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.12x | 3.63x | 2.12x | 0.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.29x | 0.81x | 0.93x | 0.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.11x | 6.98x | 11.71x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SACH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STWD delivers a 5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-12 for RC. SACH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXMT's 4.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SACH scores 6/9 vs RC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.6% | +5.5% | +2.9% | -12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +0.7% | +0.5% | -2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +4.8% | +4.3% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +2.4% | +11.3% | +1.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.59x | 2.96x | 4.61x | 3.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $267M | $21.7B | $15.7B | $5.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $499M | $453M | $248M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $278M | $22.2B | $16.2B | $5.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.25x | 1.12x | 1.11x | 0.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SACH and STWD and BXMT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STWD five years ago would be worth $10,981 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,564 for RC. Over the past 12 months, SACH leads with a +34.0% total return vs RC's -44.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BXMT at 14.0% vs RC's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.6% | +0.6% | +0.7% | +1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.0% | +5.5% | +12.1% | -44.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.4% | +42.1% | +48.1% | -54.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.2% | +9.8% | -4.1% | -44.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.2% | +83.4% | +50.5% | +6.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.8% | +12.4% | +14.0% | -23.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SACH and BXMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SACH is the less volatile stock with a 0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RC's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BXMT currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs RC's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 0.45x | 0.74x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.35 | $21.05 | $20.67 | $4.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.80 | $16.90 | $17.67 | $1.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.5% | +85.7% | +92.6% | +45.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.8 | 57.4 | 47.5 | 64.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 157K | 2.9M | 1.4M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
RC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STWD as "Buy", BXMT as "Hold", RC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.7% upside for RC (target: $3) vs 5.3% for STWD (target: $19). For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 31.37% vs BXMT's 9.86%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $19.00 | — | $2.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 | 18 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +18.4% | — | +9.9% | +31.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | — | $1.89 | $0.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.4% | +18.9% |
RC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). SACH leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
SACH vs STWD vs BXMT vs RC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SACH or STWD or BXMT or RC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is the stronger pick with 1726% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18.
2% for Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH). Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SACH or STWD or BXMT or RC?
On trailing P/E, Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
(STWD) is the cheapest at 14. 8x versus Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. at 29. 9x. On forward P/E, Starwood Property Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SACH or STWD or BXMT or RC?
Over the past 5 years, Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
(STWD) delivered a total return of +9. 8%, compared to -44. 4% for Ready Capital Corporation (RC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STWD returned +83. 4% versus SACH's -5. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SACH or STWD or BXMT or RC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sachem Capital Corp.
(SACH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 44β versus Ready Capital Corporation's 1. 17β — meaning RC is approximately 166% more volatile than SACH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 159% versus 5% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SACH or STWD or BXMT or RC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is pulling ahead at 1726% versus -18.
2% for Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. grew EPS 154. 7% year-over-year, compared to 8. 9% for Starwood Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SACH leads at 15. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SACH or STWD or BXMT or RC?
Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
(STWD) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 9% net margin versus -45. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STWD leads at 76. 2% versus 24. 2% for RC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SACH leads at 97. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SACH or STWD or BXMT or RC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
(STWD) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RC: 15. 7% to $2. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SACH or STWD or BXMT or RC?
In this comparison, RC (31.
4% yield), SACH (18. 4% yield), BXMT (9. 9% yield) pay a dividend. STWD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SACH or STWD or BXMT or RC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sachem Capital Corp.
(SACH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 44), 18. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SACH: -5. 2%, RC: +6. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SACH and STWD and BXMT and RC?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SACH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; STWD is a small-cap deep-value stock; BXMT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RC is a small-cap high-growth stock. SACH, BXMT, RC pay a dividend while STWD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.