REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SAFE vs FCPT vs NNN vs EPRT vs O
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Retail
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Retail
SAFE vs FCPT vs NNN vs EPRT vs O — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.11B | $2.80B | $8.47B | $6.81B | $57.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $386M | $301M | $936M | $593M | $5.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $114M | $117M | $387M | $257M | $800M |
| Gross Margin | 97.7% | 98.0% | 81.4% | 84.7% | 68.6% |
| Operating Margin | 39.8% | 56.0% | 63.3% | 65.0% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 21.8x | 21.7x | 24.1x | 37.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.49B | $1.21B | $4.82B | $2.52B | $32.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $12M | $5M | $60M | $435M |
SAFE vs FCPT vs NNN vs EPRT vs O — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safehold Inc. (SAFE) | 100 | 28.1 | -71.9% |
| Four Corners Proper… (FCPT) | 100 | 117.8 | +17.8% |
| NNN REIT, Inc. (NNN) | 100 | 141.8 | +41.8% |
| Essential Propertie… (EPRT) | 100 | 230.7 | +130.7% |
| Realty Income Corpo… (O) | 100 | 115.4 | +15.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SAFE vs FCPT vs NNN vs EPRT vs O
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SAFE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 37.1x), PEG 1.44 vs 71.28
FCPT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 5.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs O's 5.2%
NNN is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 4.1% ROA vs O's 1.1%, ROIC 4.8% vs 1.8%
EPRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 25.0%, EPS growth 11.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.2%
- 190.2% 10Y total return vs FCPT's 99.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 59.9%, current ratio 6.13x
- PEG 1.01 vs NNN's 1.94
O is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.09, yield 5.2%
- +14.6% vs FCPT's -3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.0% FFO/revenue growth vs SAFE's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 37.1x), PEG 1.44 vs 71.28 | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.3% margin vs O's 13.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs SAFE's 0.96, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs O's 5.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.6% vs FCPT's -3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs O's 1.1%, ROIC 4.8% vs 1.8% |
SAFE vs FCPT vs NNN vs EPRT vs O — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SAFE vs FCPT vs NNN vs EPRT vs O — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EPRT leads in 2 of 6 categories
SAFE leads 1 • FCPT leads 0 • NNN leads 0 • O leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EPRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
O is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 19.7x FCPT's $301M. EPRT is the more profitable business, keeping 43.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to O's 13.5%. On growth, EPRT holds the edge at +24.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $386M | $301M | $936M | $593M | $5.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $163M | $231M | $867M | $548M | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $114M | $117M | $387M | $257M | $800M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $48M | $188M | $464M | -$151M | $4.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +97.7% | +98.0% | +81.4% | +84.7% | +68.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +39.8% | +56.0% | +63.3% | +65.0% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +38.7% | +41.4% | +43.3% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +62.5% | +49.6% | -25.5% | +67.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.5% | +9.4% | +4.1% | +24.1% | +12.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.3% | +7.7% | -2.0% | -3.4% | -103.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SAFE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.7x trailing earnings, SAFE trades at a 82% valuation discount to O's 52.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EPRT offers better value at 1.03x vs FCPT's 118.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $2.8B | $8.5B | $6.8B | $57.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.6B | $4.0B | $13.3B | $9.3B | $90.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.70x | 23.37x | 21.50x | 24.59x | 52.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.09x | 21.81x | 21.69x | 24.13x | 37.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.53x | 118.24x | 1.93x | 1.03x | 71.28x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.64x | 17.81x | 15.85x | 17.96x | 21.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.87x | 9.51x | 9.14x | 12.11x | 10.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.45x | 1.61x | 1.90x | 1.51x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.16x | 14.54x | 12.69x | 17.86x | 14.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FCPT and NNN each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NNN delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $2 for O. EPRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SAFE's 1.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FCPT scores 7/9 vs NNN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | +7.4% | +8.8% | +6.3% | +2.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +4.1% | +4.1% | +3.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.4% | +4.5% | +4.8% | +4.4% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +6.0% | +6.4% | +5.8% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.84x | 0.74x | 1.09x | 0.60x | 0.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.5B | $1.2B | $4.8B | $2.5B | $32.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $12M | $5M | $60M | $435M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.5B | $1.2B | $4.8B | $2.5B | $32.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.57x | 3.17x | 2.93x | 3.17x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EPRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EPRT five years ago would be worth $14,313 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,904 for SAFE. Over the past 12 months, O leads with a +14.6% total return vs FCPT's -3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EPRT at 11.4% vs SAFE's -14.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.4% | +11.2% | +15.6% | +5.7% | +9.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.1% | -3.0% | +12.4% | +2.8% | +14.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.3% | +14.0% | +15.1% | +38.2% | +13.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.0% | +17.2% | +15.0% | +43.1% | +16.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.3% | +99.1% | +37.8% | +190.2% | +45.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.4% | +4.5% | +4.8% | +11.4% | +4.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NNN and EPRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAFE's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNN currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs SAFE's 89.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 0.14x | 0.15x | 0.01x | 0.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.16 | $28.14 | $46.03 | $34.73 | $67.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.76 | $22.78 | $38.90 | $28.95 | $54.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.9% | +90.5% | +96.7% | +90.6% | +90.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.8 | 55.6 | 58.4 | 45.6 | 53.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 333K | 658K | 1.5M | 2.0M | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FCPT and O each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SAFE as "Buy", FCPT as "Hold", NNN as "Hold", EPRT as "Buy", O as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.0% upside for EPRT (target: $37) vs -9.2% for SAFE (target: $14). For income investors, FCPT offers the higher dividend yield at 5.49% vs EPRT's 3.69%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $27.00 | $46.06 | $36.50 | $65.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 15 | 29 | 22 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.6% | +5.5% | +5.3% | +3.7% | +5.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.71 | $1.40 | $2.36 | $1.16 | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
EPRT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SAFE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
SAFE vs FCPT vs NNN vs EPRT vs O: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAFE or FCPT or NNN or EPRT or O a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the stronger pick with 25. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Safehold Inc. (SAFE). Safehold Inc. (SAFE) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Safehold Inc. (SAFE) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SAFE or FCPT or NNN or EPRT or O?
On trailing P/E, Safehold Inc.
(SAFE) is the cheapest at 9. 7x versus Realty Income Corporation at 52. 8x. On forward P/E, Safehold Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. wins at 1. 01x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 118. 24x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SAFE or FCPT or NNN or EPRT or O?
Over the past 5 years, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) delivered a total return of +43. 1%, compared to -71. 0% for Safehold Inc. (SAFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EPRT returned +190. 2% versus SAFE's -50. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SAFE or FCPT or NNN or EPRT or O?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Safehold Inc. 's 0. 96β — meaning SAFE is approximately 10861% more volatile than EPRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 184% for Safehold Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SAFE or FCPT or NNN or EPRT or O?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is pulling ahead at 25. 0% versus 5. 4% for Safehold Inc. (SAFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Realty Income Corporation grew EPS 19. 4% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for NNN REIT, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EPRT leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SAFE or FCPT or NNN or EPRT or O?
Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus 18. 4% for Realty Income Corporation — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SAFE leads at 79. 8% versus 28. 3% for O. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCPT leads at 95. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SAFE or FCPT or NNN or EPRT or O more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 01x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 118. 24x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Safehold Inc. (SAFE) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 37. 1x for Realty Income Corporation — 28. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EPRT: 16. 0% to $36. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SAFE or FCPT or NNN or EPRT or O?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 3. 7% for Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT).
09Is SAFE or FCPT or NNN or EPRT or O better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 3. 7% yield, +190. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EPRT: +190. 2%, SAFE: -50. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SAFE and FCPT and NNN and EPRT and O?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SAFE is a small-cap deep-value stock; FCPT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NNN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EPRT is a small-cap high-growth stock; O is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.