Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SAIH vs FWRD vs ARCB vs CODA vs ODFL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Trucking
Aerospace & Defense
Trucking
SAIH vs FWRD vs ARCB vs CODA vs ODFL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Trucking | Aerospace & Defense | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $21M | $547M | $2.72B | $134M | $41.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6M | $2.46B | $4.04B | $28M | $5.50B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-91M | $56M | $4M | $1.02B |
| Gross Margin | -18.2% | 23.1% | 4.1% | 66.3% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | -142.7% | 2.1% | 2.2% | 17.4% | 24.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 23.5x | 22.8x | 37.1x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $2.16B | $669M | $395K | $141M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $106M | $102M | $29M | $120M |
SAIH vs FWRD vs ARCB vs CODA vs ODFL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH) | 100 | 7.8 | -92.2% |
| Forward Air Corpora… (FWRD) | 100 | 11.0 | -89.0% |
| ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) | 100 | 207.9 | +107.9% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 140.0 | +40.0% |
| Old Dominion Freigh… (ODFL) | 100 | 156.3 | +56.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SAIH vs FWRD vs ARCB vs CODA vs ODFL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SAIH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FWRD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.8%, EPS growth 88.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.1%
ARCB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +107.5% vs FWRD's +0.6%
CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs ODFL's 8.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 8.86x
- 30.7% revenue growth vs SAIH's -18.2%
- Lower P/E (22.8x vs 23.5x)
ODFL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.38, yield 0.6%
- PEG 3.31 vs CODA's 5.33
- Beta 1.38, yield 0.6%, current ratio 1.44x
- 18.6% margin vs SAIH's -106.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.7% revenue growth vs SAIH's -18.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.8x vs 23.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs SAIH's -106.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs FWRD's 2.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs ARCB's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +107.5% vs FWRD's +0.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.5% ROA vs SAIH's -32.2%, ROIC 23.6% vs -38.9% |
SAIH vs FWRD vs ARCB vs CODA vs ODFL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SAIH vs FWRD vs ARCB vs CODA vs ODFL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ODFL leads in 2 of 6 categories
CODA leads 1 • ARCB leads 1 • SAIH leads 0 • FWRD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ODFL is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.5B annually — 991.6x SAIH's $6M. ODFL is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SAIH's -106.2%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6M | $2.5B | $4.0B | $28M | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $206M | $217M | $6M | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$91M | $56M | $4M | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $38M | $169M | $7M | $955M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -18.2% | +23.1% | +4.1% | +66.3% | +32.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -142.7% | +2.1% | +2.2% | +17.4% | +24.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -106.2% | -3.7% | +1.4% | +14.8% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -113.1% | +1.6% | +4.2% | +24.6% | +17.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -5.1% | +3.3% | +28.8% | -5.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +35.1% | -138.5% | +3.0% | -11.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FWRD and CODA each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 32.2x trailing earnings, CODA trades at a 31% valuation discount to ARCB's 46.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ODFL offers better value at 3.66x vs CODA's 7.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $547M | $2.7B | $134M | $41.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $2.6B | $3.3B | $106M | $41.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.22x | -4.98x | 46.48x | 32.16x | 41.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 23.46x | 22.85x | 37.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 7.51x | 3.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.75x | 12.59x | 17.85x | 23.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.84x | 0.22x | 0.68x | 5.05x | 7.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.32x | 3.32x | 2.16x | 2.30x | 9.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 35.82x | 23.78x | 22.20x | 43.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ODFL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ODFL delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-53 for FWRD. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FWRD's 13.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs SAIH's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -37.7% | -52.6% | +4.3% | +7.2% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.2% | -3.3% | +2.3% | +6.6% | +18.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -38.9% | +1.2% | +3.9% | +11.2% | +23.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -49.1% | +1.5% | +5.1% | +8.1% | +27.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 13.36x | 0.52x | 0.01x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $2.1B | $567M | -$28M | $21M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $106M | $102M | $29M | $120M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $2.2B | $669M | $394,932 | $141M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.32x | 6.58x | — | 4601.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARCB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ODFL five years ago would be worth $15,002 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $767 for SAIH. Over the past 12 months, ARCB leads with a +107.5% total return vs FWRD's +0.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARCB at 12.0% vs FWRD's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.6% | -31.0% | +58.0% | +25.1% | +24.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.2% | +0.6% | +107.5% | +78.9% | +28.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.6% | -81.3% | +40.5% | +34.5% | +29.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.3% | -80.2% | +37.1% | +49.7% | +50.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.3% | -47.3% | +627.8% | +844.4% | +841.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.3% | -42.8% | +12.0% | +10.4% | +8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARCB and CODA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CODA is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FWRD's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARCB currently trades 90.1% from its 52-week high vs FWRD's 53.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.70x | 2.18x | 1.85x | 0.99x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.41 | $32.47 | $135.10 | $17.28 | $233.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.00 | $14.81 | $58.16 | $5.98 | $126.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.4% | +53.4% | +90.1% | +68.9% | +84.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.2 | 42.4 | 60.5 | 48.6 | 45.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 733K | 307K | 256K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
ODFL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FWRD as "Hold", ARCB as "Buy", CODA as "Buy", ODFL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.6% upside for CODA (target: $14) vs -3.8% for ARCB (target: $117). For income investors, ODFL offers the higher dividend yield at 0.57% vs ARCB's 0.39%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.50 | $117.14 | $14.00 | $208.19 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 | 24 | 1 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.4% | — | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 4 | 0 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.48 | — | $1.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +2.8% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
ODFL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). CODA leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
SAIH vs FWRD vs ARCB vs CODA vs ODFL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAIH or FWRD or ARCB or CODA or ODFL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 2% for SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) offers the better valuation at 32. 2x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ArcBest Corporation (ARCB) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SAIH or FWRD or ARCB or CODA or ODFL?
On trailing P/E, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the cheapest at 32. 2x versus ArcBest Corporation at 46. 5x. On forward P/E, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. wins at 3. 31x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. 's 5. 33x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SAIH or FWRD or ARCB or CODA or ODFL?
Over the past 5 years, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) delivered a total return of +50. 0%, compared to -92. 3% for SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +861. 1% versus SAIH's -92. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SAIH or FWRD or ARCB or CODA or ODFL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Forward Air Corporation's 2. 18β — meaning FWRD is approximately 119% more volatile than CODA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 13% for Forward Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SAIH or FWRD or ARCB or CODA or ODFL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -18. 2% for SAIHEAT Limited (SAIH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Forward Air Corporation grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to -64. 1% for ArcBest Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FWRD leads at 14. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SAIH or FWRD or ARCB or CODA or ODFL?
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 6% net margin versus -106. 2% for SAIHEAT Limited — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ODFL leads at 24. 8% versus -142. 7% for SAIH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SAIH or FWRD or ARCB or CODA or ODFL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 31x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. 's 5. 33x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) trades at 22. 8x forward P/E versus 37. 1x for Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. — 14. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CODA: 17. 6% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SAIH or FWRD or ARCB or CODA or ODFL?
In this comparison, ODFL (0.
6% yield), ARCB (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. SAIH, FWRD, CODA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SAIH or FWRD or ARCB or CODA or ODFL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
(ODFL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +843. 0% 10Y return). Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) carries a higher beta of 2. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ODFL: +843. 0%, FWRD: -64. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SAIH and FWRD and ARCB and CODA and ODFL?
These companies operate in different sectors (SAIH (Technology) and FWRD (Industrials) and ARCB (Industrials) and CODA (Industrials) and ODFL (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SAIH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FWRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARCB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; ODFL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ODFL pays a dividend while SAIH, FWRD, ARCB, CODA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.