Investment - Banking & Investment Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SAJ vs GAIN vs HTGC vs ARCC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
SAJ vs GAIN vs HTGC vs ARCC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Investment - Banking & Investment Services | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $414M | $657M | $3.07B | $13.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $94M | $90M | $547M | $3.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $39M | $130M | $289M | $1.15B |
| Gross Margin | 44.7% | 68.6% | 87.2% | 75.7% |
| Operating Margin | 33.9% | 72.7% | 66.7% | 69.7% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 40.7x | 8.4x | 9.9x |
| Total Debt | $782M | $456M | $2.30B | $15.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $148M | $14M | $57M | $924M |
SAJ vs GAIN vs HTGC vs ARCC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saratoga Investment… (SAJ) | 100 | 102.3 | +2.3% |
| Gladstone Investmen… (GAIN) | 100 | 119.1 | +19.1% |
| Hercules Capital, I… (HTGC) | 100 | 114.1 | +14.1% |
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 96.7 | -3.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SAJ vs GAIN vs HTGC vs ARCC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SAJ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 11.4%
- Rev growth 35.4%, EPS growth 184.5%
- 35.4% NII/revenue growth vs GAIN's -12.9%
- Better valuation composite
GAIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 319.3% 10Y total return vs HTGC's 171.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 91.3%, current ratio 3.69x
- Beta 0.53, yield 10.0%, current ratio 3.69x
- Beta 0.53 vs ARCC's 0.77, lower leverage
HTGC is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 9.1% vs ARCC's 3.6%
ARCC is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs HTGC's 0.2% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs HTGC's 0.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.4% NII/revenue growth vs GAIN's -12.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs HTGC's 0.2% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs ARCC's 0.77, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GAIN's 10.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.8% vs ARCC's +0.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs HTGC's 0.2% |
SAJ vs GAIN vs HTGC vs ARCC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GAIN leads in 4 of 6 categories
SAJ leads 1 • HTGC leads 0 • ARCC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GAIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 35.0x GAIN's $90M. GAIN is the more profitable business, keeping 72.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SAJ's 29.8%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $94M | $90M | $547M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $58M | $381M | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $39M | $130M | $289M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | -$82M | -$352M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.7% | +68.6% | +87.2% | +75.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.9% | +72.7% | +66.7% | +69.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.8% | +72.7% | +62.1% | +41.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +126.8% | -77.8% | +36.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.6% | +58.1% | -20.7% | -63.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SAJ and HTGC and ARCC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.9x trailing earnings, HTGC trades at a 30% valuation discount to SAJ's 12.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ARCC's 13.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SAJ's 32.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $414M | $657M | $3.1B | $13.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $1.1B | $5.3B | $28.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.70x | 9.28x | 8.86x | 10.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.36x | 40.66x | 8.36x | 9.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 32.78x | 16.82x | 14.54x | 13.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.40x | 7.31x | 5.61x | 4.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.91x | 1.22x | 1.44x | 0.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.10x | 5.77x | — | 11.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GAIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GAIN delivers a 21.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $8 for ARCC. GAIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.91x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SAJ's 1.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAJ scores 8/9 vs ARCC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +21.9% | +13.2% | +8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +10.5% | +6.4% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +5.3% | +6.6% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +6.8% | +8.8% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.99x | 0.91x | 1.04x | 1.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $634M | $441M | $2.2B | $15.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $148M | $14M | $57M | $924M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $782M | $456M | $2.3B | $16.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.83x | 1.58x | 4.34x | 2.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GAIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GAIN five years ago would be worth $17,205 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,040 for SAJ. Over the past 12 months, GAIN leads with a +30.8% total return vs ARCC's +0.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HTGC at 17.9% vs SAJ's 8.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | +20.7% | -10.6% | -4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.9% | +30.8% | +6.6% | +0.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.3% | +56.5% | +63.9% | +34.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.4% | +72.0% | +46.8% | +47.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.4% | +319.3% | +171.6% | +139.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.1% | +16.1% | +17.9% | +10.3% |
Risk & Volatility
GAIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GAIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARCC's 0.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GAIN currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs ARCC's 81.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.51x | 0.68x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.92 | $17.14 | $19.67 | $23.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.05 | $13.11 | $13.70 | $17.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.3% | +96.3% | +83.4% | +81.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.9 | 69.9 | 64.7 | 56.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 371K | 2.5M | 7.5M |
Analyst Outlook
SAJ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GAIN as "Hold", HTGC as "Buy", ARCC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.4% upside for ARCC (target: $22) vs -9.1% for GAIN (target: $15). For income investors, SAJ offers the higher dividend yield at 11.42% vs ARCC's 2.02%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.00 | $18.63 | $21.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 31 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.4% | +10.0% | +8.6% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.93 | $1.66 | $1.42 | $0.38 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
GAIN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SAJ leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SAJ vs GAIN vs HTGC vs ARCC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAJ or GAIN or HTGC or ARCC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Saratoga Investment Corp 8.
00% (SAJ) is the stronger pick with 35. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 9% for Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN). Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) offers the better valuation at 8. 9x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SAJ or GAIN or HTGC or ARCC?
On trailing P/E, Hercules Capital, Inc.
(HTGC) is the cheapest at 8. 9x versus Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 00% at 12. 7x. On forward P/E, Hercules Capital, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SAJ or GAIN or HTGC or ARCC?
Over the past 5 years, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) delivered a total return of +72.
0%, compared to +30. 4% for Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 00% (SAJ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GAIN returned +321. 5% versus SAJ's +30. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SAJ or GAIN or HTGC or ARCC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 75β — meaning ARCC is approximately 48% more volatile than GAIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 91% versus 199% for Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 00% — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SAJ or GAIN or HTGC or ARCC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Saratoga Investment Corp 8.
00% (SAJ) is pulling ahead at 35. 4% versus -12. 9% for Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 00% grew EPS 184. 5% year-over-year, compared to -27. 9% for Gladstone Investment Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SAJ or GAIN or HTGC or ARCC?
Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the more profitable company, earning 72.
7% net margin versus 29. 8% for Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 00% — meaning it keeps 72. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GAIN leads at 72. 7% versus 33. 9% for SAJ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HTGC leads at 87. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SAJ or GAIN or HTGC or ARCC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hercules Capital, Inc.
(HTGC) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 40. 7x for Gladstone Investment Corporation — 32. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARCC: 15. 4% to $21. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — SAJ or GAIN or HTGC or ARCC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 00% (SAJ) offers the highest yield at 11. 4%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).
09Is SAJ or GAIN or HTGC or ARCC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 10. 0% yield, +321. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GAIN: +321. 5%, SAJ: +30. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SAJ and GAIN and HTGC and ARCC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SAJ is a small-cap high-growth stock; GAIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; HTGC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.