Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SATL vs RDW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
SATL vs RDW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $939M | $10.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18M | $335M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-227M |
| Gross Margin | 44.4% | 5.2% |
| Operating Margin | -134.9% | -68.5% |
| Total Debt | $63M | $44M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $94M | $95M |
SATL vs RDW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Satellogic Inc. (SATL) | 100 | 70.9 | -29.1% |
| Redwire Corporation (RDW) | 100 | 82.7 | -17.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SATL vs RDW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SATL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.66
- Rev growth 37.6%, EPS growth 85.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 43.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.66, current ratio 5.12x
RDW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -16.7% 10Y total return vs SATL's -29.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.6% revenue growth vs RDW's 10.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -19.4% margin vs RDW's -67.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.66 vs RDW's 3.20 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.1% vs RDW's -24.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.8% ROA vs RDW's -15.6% |
SATL vs RDW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SATL vs RDW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SATL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RDW is the larger business by revenue, generating $335M annually — 18.9x SATL's $18M. SATL is the more profitable business, keeping -19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RDW's -67.6%. On growth, SATL holds the edge at +106.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18M | $335M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$18M | -$209M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | -$227M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$34M | -$165M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.4% | +5.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -134.9% | -68.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.4% | -67.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -193.5% | -49.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.8% | +56.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +153.3% | +64.5% |
Valuation Metrics
RDW leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $939M | $10.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $907M | $10.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -38.87x | -3.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 53.00x | 30.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.51x | 9.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RDW leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RDW delivers a -21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-21 in annual profit, vs $-92 for SATL. RDW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SATL's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RDW scores 4/9 vs SATL's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -91.7% | -21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.8% | -15.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -32.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -32.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.05x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$31M | -$51M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $94M | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $63M | $44M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1009.83x | -2.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SATL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RDW five years ago would be worth $8,640 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,133 for SATL. Over the past 12 months, SATL leads with a +60.1% total return vs RDW's -24.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SATL at 48.7% vs RDW's 43.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +257.0% | -3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.1% | -24.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +228.5% | +197.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.7% | -13.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.3% | -16.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +48.7% | +43.8% |
Risk & Volatility
SATL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SATL is the less volatile stock with a 2.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RDW's 3.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SATL currently trades 83.8% from its 52-week high vs RDW's 39.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.66x | 3.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.35 | $22.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.25 | $4.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.8% | +39.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.8 | 43.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.6M | 19.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SATL as "Sell" and RDW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.7% upside for RDW (target: $14) vs -21.4% for SATL (target: $6).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.50 | $14.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SATL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). RDW leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
SATL vs RDW: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SATL or RDW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Satellogic Inc.
(SATL) is the stronger pick with 37. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 3% for Redwire Corporation (RDW). Analysts rate Redwire Corporation (RDW) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SATL or RDW?
Over the past 5 years, Redwire Corporation (RDW) delivered a total return of -13.
6%, compared to -28. 7% for Satellogic Inc. (SATL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RDW returned -16. 7% versus SATL's -29. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SATL or RDW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Satellogic Inc.
(SATL) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 66β versus Redwire Corporation's 3. 20β — meaning RDW is approximately 20% more volatile than SATL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Redwire Corporation (RDW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 105% for Satellogic Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SATL or RDW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Satellogic Inc.
(SATL) is pulling ahead at 37. 6% versus 10. 3% for Redwire Corporation (RDW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Satellogic Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to 3. 0% for Redwire Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SATL leads at 43. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SATL or RDW?
Satellogic Inc.
(SATL) is the more profitable company, earning -19. 4% net margin versus -67. 6% for Redwire Corporation — meaning it keeps -19. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RDW leads at -68. 5% versus -134. 9% for SATL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SATL leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SATL or RDW?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SATL or RDW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Redwire Corporation (RDW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Satellogic Inc. (SATL) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RDW: -16. 7%, SATL: -29. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SATL and RDW?
These companies operate in different sectors (SATL (Technology) and RDW (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SATL is a small-cap high-growth stock; RDW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.