Investment - Banking & Investment Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SAZ vs ARCC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
SAZ vs ARCC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Investment - Banking & Investment Services | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $414M | $13.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $94M | $3.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $39M | $1.15B |
| Gross Margin | 44.7% | 75.7% |
| Operating Margin | 33.9% | 69.7% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 9.9x |
| Total Debt | $782M | $15.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $148M | $924M |
SAZ vs ARCC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saratoga Investment… (SAZ) | 100 | 102.1 | +2.1% |
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 102.6 | +2.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SAZ vs ARCC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SAZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 11.4%
- Rev growth 35.4%, EPS growth 184.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, current ratio 27.93x
ARCC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 139.2% 10Y total return vs SAZ's 27.1%
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs SAZ's 0.1% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs SAZ's 0.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.4% NII/revenue growth vs ARCC's 32.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs SAZ's 0.1% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs ARCC's 0.77 | |
| Dividends | 11.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs ARCC's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.8% vs ARCC's +0.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs SAZ's 0.1% |
SAZ vs ARCC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARCC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 33.4x SAZ's $94M. ARCC is the more profitable business, keeping 41.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SAZ's 29.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $94M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $39M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.7% | +75.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.9% | +69.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.8% | +41.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +36.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.6% | -63.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ARCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, ARCC trades at a 20% valuation discount to SAZ's 12.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ARCC's 13.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SAZ's 32.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $414M | $13.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $28.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.70x | 10.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.34x | 9.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 32.78x | 13.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.40x | 4.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.91x | 0.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.10x | 11.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARCC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SAZ delivers a 9.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $8 for ARCC. ARCC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SAZ's 1.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAZ scores 8/9 vs ARCC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.99x | 1.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $634M | $15.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $148M | $924M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $782M | $16.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.83x | 2.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARCC five years ago would be worth $14,704 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,712 for SAZ. Over the past 12 months, SAZ leads with a +8.8% total return vs ARCC's +0.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARCC at 10.3% vs SAZ's 8.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.3% | -4.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.8% | +0.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.1% | +34.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.1% | +47.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.1% | +139.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.3% | +10.3% |
Risk & Volatility
SAZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SAZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARCC's 0.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAZ currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs ARCC's 81.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.76 | $23.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.95 | $17.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +81.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 78.4 | 56.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 7.5M |
Analyst Outlook
SAZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, SAZ offers the higher dividend yield at 11.41% vs ARCC's 2.02%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $21.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.4% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.93 | $0.38 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARCC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SAZ leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
SAZ vs ARCC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SAZ or ARCC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Saratoga Investment Corp 8.
50% (SAZ) is the stronger pick with 35. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 32. 9% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SAZ or ARCC?
On trailing P/E, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the cheapest at 10.
2x versus Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 50% at 12. 7x. On forward P/E, Ares Capital Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SAZ or ARCC?
Over the past 5 years, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) delivered a total return of +47.
0%, compared to +27. 1% for Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 50% (SAZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARCC returned +139. 2% versus SAZ's +27. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SAZ or ARCC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Saratoga Investment Corp 8.
50% (SAZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 77β — meaning ARCC is approximately 48% more volatile than SAZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 112% versus 199% for Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 50% — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SAZ or ARCC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Saratoga Investment Corp 8.
50% (SAZ) is pulling ahead at 35. 4% versus 32. 9% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 50% grew EPS 184. 5% year-over-year, compared to -23. 8% for Ares Capital Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SAZ or ARCC?
Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
3% net margin versus 29. 8% for Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 50% — meaning it keeps 41. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARCC leads at 69. 7% versus 33. 9% for SAZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARCC leads at 75. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SAZ or ARCC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) trades at 9.
9x forward P/E versus 10. 3x for Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 50% — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — SAZ or ARCC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Saratoga Investment Corp 8. 50% (SAZ) offers the highest yield at 11. 4%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).
09Is SAZ or ARCC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Saratoga Investment Corp 8.
50% (SAZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 11. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAZ: +27. 1%, ARCC: +139. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SAZ and ARCC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.