Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Banks - Regional
SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $147M | $79.60B | $97.79B | $207M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $91M | $12.64B | $6.76B | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $3.30B | $4.24B | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 70.6% | 61.9% | 86.3% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.0% | 38.7% | 65.6% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 17.3x | 22.0x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $74M | $20.28B | $3.76B | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $837M | $4.42B | $119M |
SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SB Financial Group,… (SBFG) | 100 | 147.3 | +47.3% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 153.4 | +53.4% |
| CME Group Inc. (CME) | 100 | 165.8 | +65.8% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SBFG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and bank quality is your priority.
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 27.3%
- NIM 3.1% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- 11.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 11.8x)
ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.35 vs SBFG's 0.64
CME carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta -0.28, yield 4.1%
- 262.4% 10Y total return vs ICE's 195.3%
- PEG 1.60 vs SBFG's 2.94
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs SBFG's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- +52.1% vs ICE's -20.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 11.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs SBFG's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs SBFG's 0.64 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs ICE's -20.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs SBFG's 0.5% |
SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CME leads in 3 of 6 categories
SBFG leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • ICE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CME leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 140.3x CZWI's $90M. CME is the more profitable business, keeping 62.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBFG's 15.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $91M | $12.6B | $6.8B | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $19M | $6.5B | $4.7B | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $3.3B | $4.2B | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $4.3B | $4.4B | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.6% | +61.9% | +86.3% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +38.7% | +65.6% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | +26.1% | +62.8% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +33.9% | +64.4% | +12.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.5% | +23.1% | +21.4% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SBFG leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, SBFG trades at a 56% valuation discount to ICE's 24.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CME offers better value at 1.76x vs SBFG's 3.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $147M | $79.6B | $97.8B | $207M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $150M | $99.0B | $97.1B | $140M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.64x | 24.36x | 24.15x | 14.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.44x | 17.34x | 21.98x | 11.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.32x | 2.74x | 1.76x | 2.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.69x | 15.34x | 21.56x | 15.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.61x | 6.30x | 15.00x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 2.77x | 3.38x | 1.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.85x | 18.56x | 23.32x | 19.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CME leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CME delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. CME carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs CME's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.3% | +11.6% | +15.3% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +2.3% | +2.2% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +7.5% | +10.2% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.0% | +9.5% | +3.6% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 0.70x | 0.13x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $19.4B | -$666M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $837M | $4.4B | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $74M | $20.3B | $3.8B | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.68x | 6.53x | 41.55x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $16,900 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,085 for ICE. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs ICE's -20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs ICE's 10.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.6% | -11.8% | +3.2% | +24.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.3% | -20.4% | +3.6% | +52.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.0% | +34.6% | +67.9% | +153.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.8% | +30.9% | +46.2% | +69.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.5% | +195.3% | +262.4% | +149.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.6% | +10.4% | +18.9% | +36.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SBFG and CME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CME is the less volatile stock with a -0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBFG's 0.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBFG currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 0.35x | -0.28x | 0.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.93 | $189.35 | $329.16 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.10 | $136.67 | $244.56 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.4% | +74.2% | +81.9% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.2 | 31.9 | 40.1 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 3.2M | 2.6M | 41K |
Analyst Outlook
CME leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ICE as "Buy", CME as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.0% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs 19.0% for CME (target: $321). For income investors, CME offers the higher dividend yield at 4.05% vs ICE's 1.38%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $194.00 | $320.80 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 36 | 36 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +1.4% | +4.1% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 13 | 15 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $1.93 | $10.92 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.9% | +1.7% | +0.3% | +3.0% |
CME leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SBFG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SBFG vs ICE vs CME vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SB Financial Group, Inc.
(SBFG) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, SB Financial Group, Inc.
(SBFG) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, SB Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CME Group Inc. wins at 1. 60x versus SB Financial Group, Inc. 's 2. 94x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +69. 0%, compared to +30. 9% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CME returned +262. 4% versus CZWI's +149. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CME Group Inc.
(CME) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 28β versus SB Financial Group, Inc. 's 0. 64β — meaning SBFG is approximately -329% more volatile than CME relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CME Group Inc. (CME) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 70% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SB Financial Group, Inc.
(SBFG) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SB Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 27. 3% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI?
CME Group Inc.
(CME) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 0% net margin versus 15. 4% for SB Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 62. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CME leads at 64. 9% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CME leads at 86. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, CME Group Inc. (CME) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 60x versus SB Financial Group, Inc. 's 2. 94x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 22. 0x for CME Group Inc. — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 38. 0% to $194. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CME Group Inc. (CME) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).
09Is SBFG or ICE or CME or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CME Group Inc.
(CME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 28), 4. 1% yield, +262. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CME: +262. 4%, SBFG: +167. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SBFG and ICE and CME and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SBFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CME is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.