Regulated Water
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SBS vs AWK vs CWT vs YORW vs MSEX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
SBS vs AWK vs CWT vs YORW vs MSEX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Water | Regulated Water | Regulated Water | Regulated Water | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $21.77B | $24.64B | $2.61B | $421M | $955M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37.34B | $5.21B | $1.01B | $-18M | $199M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8.30B | $1.10B | $119M | $21M | $44M |
| Gross Margin | 36.6% | 43.6% | 42.6% | 54.8% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 32.2% | 36.5% | 15.7% | 35.8% | 28.1% |
| Forward P/E | 0.7x | 20.7x | 16.9x | 18.0x | 20.1x |
| Total Debt | $39.99B | $15.92B | $1.62B | $232M | $419M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.67B | $119M | $52M | $1K | $3M |
SBS vs AWK vs CWT vs YORW vs MSEX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Companhia de Saneam… (SBS) | 100 | 316.9 | +216.9% |
| American Water Work… (AWK) | 100 | 99.4 | -0.6% |
| California Water Se… (CWT) | 100 | 92.9 | -7.1% |
| The York Water Comp… (YORW) | 100 | 65.7 | -34.3% |
| Middlesex Water Com… (MSEX) | 100 | 75.8 | -24.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SBS vs AWK vs CWT vs YORW vs MSEX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SBS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs AWK's 100.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 94.4%, current ratio 1.12x
- PEG 0.01 vs MSEX's 12.58
- Lower P/E (0.7x vs 20.1x), PEG 0.01 vs 12.58
AWK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.7%, EPS growth 5.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.7%
- 9.7% revenue growth vs CWT's -3.5%
CWT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
YORW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 31 yrs, beta 0.08, yield 3.0%
- Beta 0.08, yield 3.0%
- 25.9% margin vs CWT's 11.8%
- Beta 0.08 vs SBS's 0.82
Among these 5 stocks, MSEX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.7% revenue growth vs CWT's -3.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 20.1x), PEG 0.01 vs 12.58 | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.9% margin vs CWT's 11.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.08 vs SBS's 0.82 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 31-year raise streak, vs AWK's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.9% vs MSEX's -12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.8% ROA vs CWT's 2.1%, ROIC 13.1% vs 4.4% |
SBS vs AWK vs CWT vs YORW vs MSEX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SBS vs AWK vs CWT vs YORW vs MSEX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SBS leads in 3 of 6 categories
YORW leads 2 • AWK leads 0 • CWT leads 0 • MSEX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YORW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBS and YORW operate at a comparable scale, with $37.3B and -$18M in trailing revenue. YORW is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CWT's 11.8%. On growth, MSEX holds the edge at +10.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37.3B | $5.2B | $1.0B | -$18M | $199M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14.2B | $2.8B | $308M | $42M | $81M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8.3B | $1.1B | $119M | $21M | $44M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13.1B | -$1.2B | -$93M | -$30M | -$19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.6% | +43.6% | +42.6% | +54.8% | +33.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.2% | +36.5% | +15.7% | +35.8% | +28.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +21.2% | +11.8% | +25.9% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.0% | -23.1% | -9.2% | -24.3% | -9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.9% | +5.7% | +5.2% | -100.0% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.6% | -3.8% | -69.3% | +32.0% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SBS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.0x trailing earnings, SBS trades at a 41% valuation discount to AWK's 22.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SBS offers better value at 0.24x vs MSEX's 13.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21.8B | $24.6B | $2.6B | $421M | $955M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28.9B | $40.4B | $4.2B | $653M | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.03x | 22.14x | 20.30x | 20.99x | 21.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.66x | 20.72x | 16.89x | 18.01x | 20.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.24x | 2.81x | 11.51x | 11.52x | 13.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.08x | 14.58x | 12.81x | 15.56x | 15.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.89x | 4.79x | 2.61x | 5.43x | 4.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.55x | 2.27x | 1.54x | 1.75x | 1.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SBS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SBS delivers a 20.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $7 for CWT. MSEX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.85x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AWK's 1.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWK scores 5/9 vs YORW's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.2% | +10.1% | +6.9% | +8.9% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.8% | +3.1% | +2.1% | +3.2% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.1% | +5.5% | +4.4% | +4.6% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.2% | +6.1% | +3.7% | +4.4% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.94x | 1.47x | 0.95x | 0.97x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $35.3B | $15.8B | $1.6B | $232M | $416M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.7B | $119M | $52M | $1,000 | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $40.0B | $15.9B | $1.6B | $232M | $419M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.86x | 3.06x | 3.20x | 1.92x | 4.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SBS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SBS five years ago would be worth $51,513 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,799 for YORW. Over the past 12 months, SBS leads with a +73.9% total return vs MSEX's -12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SBS at 62.2% vs YORW's -9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.1% | -2.5% | +2.4% | -7.3% | +3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +73.9% | -12.5% | -8.5% | -9.4% | -12.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +326.8% | -8.2% | -17.2% | -25.9% | -25.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +415.1% | -8.1% | -15.2% | -32.0% | -28.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +528.6% | +100.9% | +83.5% | +25.0% | +62.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +62.2% | -2.8% | -6.1% | -9.5% | -9.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AWK and CWT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWK is the less volatile stock with a -0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SBS's 0.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWT currently trades 86.5% from its 52-week high vs SBS's 23.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | -0.48x | -0.26x | 0.08x | -0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.61 | $150.29 | $50.44 | $35.10 | $62.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.78 | $121.28 | $41.29 | $28.26 | $44.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.9% | +84.0% | +86.5% | +83.1% | +82.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.8 | 33.8 | 39.1 | 34.8 | 44.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19.2M | 1.7M | 491K | 174K | 160K |
Analyst Outlook
YORW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SBS as "Hold", AWK as "Hold", CWT as "Buy", YORW as "Hold", MSEX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 273.5% upside for SBS (target: $24) vs 4.1% for MSEX (target: $54). For income investors, YORW offers the higher dividend yield at 3.00% vs SBS's 2.15%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.79 | $134.67 | $54.00 | — | $53.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 29 | 10 | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.6% | +2.8% | +3.0% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 | 22 | 31 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.68 | $3.25 | $1.24 | $0.88 | $1.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SBS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). YORW leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SBS vs AWK vs CWT vs YORW vs MSEX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SBS or AWK or CWT or YORW or MSEX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the stronger pick with 9. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 5% for California Water Service Group (CWT). Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) offers the better valuation at 13. 0x trailing P/E (0. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate California Water Service Group (CWT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SBS or AWK or CWT or YORW or MSEX?
On trailing P/E, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) is the cheapest at 13.
0x versus American Water Works Company, Inc. at 22. 1x. On forward P/E, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP is actually cheaper at 0. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP wins at 0. 01x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SBS or AWK or CWT or YORW or MSEX?
Over the past 5 years, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) delivered a total return of +415.
1%, compared to -32. 0% for The York Water Company (YORW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBS returned +528. 6% versus YORW's +25. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SBS or AWK or CWT or YORW or MSEX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 48β versus Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP's 0. 82β — meaning SBS is approximately -272% more volatile than AWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 85% versus 147% for American Water Works Company, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SBS or AWK or CWT or YORW or MSEX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is pulling ahead at 9. 7% versus -3. 5% for California Water Service Group (CWT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Water Works Company, Inc. grew EPS 5. 8% year-over-year, compared to -33. 8% for California Water Service Group. Over a 3-year CAGR, SBS leads at 19. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SBS or AWK or CWT or YORW or MSEX?
The York Water Company (YORW) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
9% net margin versus 12. 8% for California Water Service Group — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWK leads at 36. 6% versus 18. 2% for CWT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YORW leads at 54. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SBS or AWK or CWT or YORW or MSEX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 01x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) trades at 0. 7x forward P/E versus 20. 7x for American Water Works Company, Inc. — 20. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBS: 273. 5% to $23. 79.
08Which pays a better dividend — SBS or AWK or CWT or YORW or MSEX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The York Water Company (YORW) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 2. 1% for Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS).
09Is SBS or AWK or CWT or YORW or MSEX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 48), 2. 6% yield, +100. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWK: +100. 9%, SBS: +528. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SBS and AWK and CWT and YORW and MSEX?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SBS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AWK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CWT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; YORW is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MSEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.