Gold
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SBSW vs PAL vs CVLG vs SA vs WERN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Trucking
Gold
Trucking
SBSW vs PAL vs CVLG vs SA vs WERN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Trucking | Gold | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $9.33B | $204M | $833M | $3.16B | $2.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $238.26B | $430M | $1.16B | $0.00 | $2.97B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12.39B | $-33M | $7M | $-50M | $-14M |
| Gross Margin | 21.2% | 7.9% | 12.0% | — | 8.3% |
| Operating Margin | 18.9% | 3.8% | 1.2% | — | 1.9% |
| Forward P/E | 0.2x | 21.4x | 19.3x | — | 39.8x |
| Total Debt | $44.34B | $98M | $339M | $564M | $752M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17.16B | $14M | $296M | $50M | $60M |
SBSW vs PAL vs CVLG vs SA vs WERN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sibanye Stillwater … (SBSW) | 100 | 260.2 | +160.2% |
| Proficient Auto Log… (PAL) | 100 | 47.9 | -52.1% |
| Covenant Logistics … (CVLG) | 100 | 139.6 | +39.6% |
| Seabridge Gold Inc. (SA) | 100 | 187.3 | +87.3% |
| Werner Enterprises,… (WERN) | 100 | 96.8 | -3.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SBSW vs PAL vs CVLG vs SA vs WERN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SBSW has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth 34.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.6%
- Lower P/E (0.2x vs 39.8x)
- +167.2% vs PAL's -9.6%
PAL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 78.7% revenue growth vs SA's -6.1%
CVLG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 234.5% 10Y total return vs SA's 129.8%
- 0.6% margin vs PAL's -7.8%
- 0.7% ROA vs SBSW's -8.3%, ROIC 1.8% vs 22.9%
SA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 66.9%, current ratio 2.86x
- Beta 1.21 vs PAL's 2.58
WERN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.24, yield 1.5%
- Beta 1.24, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.94x
- 1.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs SBSW's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 78.7% revenue growth vs SA's -6.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.2x vs 39.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.6% margin vs PAL's -7.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.21 vs PAL's 2.58 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs SBSW's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +167.2% vs PAL's -9.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.7% ROA vs SBSW's -8.3%, ROIC 1.8% vs 22.9% |
SBSW vs PAL vs CVLG vs SA vs WERN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SBSW vs PAL vs CVLG vs SA vs WERN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SBSW leads in 1 of 6 categories
PAL leads 1 • CVLG leads 1 • WERN leads 1 • SA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBSW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBSW and SA operate at a comparable scale, with $238.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. CVLG is the more profitable business, keeping 0.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PAL's -7.8%. On growth, SBSW holds the edge at +25.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $238.3B | $430M | $1.2B | $0 | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $63.5B | $56M | $113M | -$22M | $343M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12.4B | -$33M | $7M | -$50M | -$14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9.5B | $22M | $114M | -$126M | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +7.9% | +12.0% | — | +8.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +3.8% | +1.2% | — | +1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | -7.8% | +0.6% | — | -0.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +5.2% | +9.8% | — | -2.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.4% | +12.8% | +6.5% | — | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.0% | -6.7% | -4.0% | -3.2% | -3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
PAL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PAL's 5.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WERN's 8.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.3B | $204M | $833M | $3.2B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.0B | $287M | $876M | $3.5B | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -31.78x | -6.07x | 122.91x | -115.74x | -151.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.25x | 21.44x | 19.31x | — | 39.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.67x | 5.16x | 7.74x | — | 8.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.27x | 0.47x | 0.72x | — | 0.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.47x | 0.64x | 2.05x | 4.27x | 1.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 90.73x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SBSW and PAL and CVLG each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CVLG delivers a 1.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-28 for SBSW. PAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SBSW's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SBSW scores 6/9 vs PAL's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.1% | -10.1% | +1.7% | -4.7% | -1.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.3% | -6.6% | +0.7% | -2.9% | -0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.9% | +3.0% | +1.8% | -1.3% | +2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.1% | +3.8% | +1.6% | -1.6% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.00x | 0.31x | 0.84x | 0.67x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $27.2B | $84M | $42M | $514M | $692M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17.2B | $14M | $296M | $50M | $60M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $44.3B | $98M | $339M | $564M | $752M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.31x | 2.49x | 1.46x | -18.32x | 0.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CVLG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CVLG five years ago would be worth $29,261 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,976 for PAL. Over the past 12 months, SBSW leads with a +167.2% total return vs PAL's -9.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SA at 23.2% vs PAL's -20.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.5% | -25.2% | +49.1% | -0.5% | +19.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +167.2% | -9.6% | +64.0% | +137.9% | +45.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.9% | -50.2% | +72.8% | +87.2% | -16.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.9% | -50.2% | +192.6% | +63.6% | -19.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.7% | -50.2% | +234.5% | +129.8% | +78.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.1% | -20.8% | +20.0% | +23.2% | -5.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SA and WERN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SA is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PAL's 2.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WERN currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs SBSW's 62.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 2.58x | 1.54x | 1.21x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.29 | $10.97 | $35.91 | $40.06 | $38.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.52 | $5.76 | $18.00 | $11.12 | $23.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.0% | +66.9% | +92.4% | +74.1% | +94.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 54.8 | 59.2 | 52.5 | 65.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.7M | 298K | 149K | 969K | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
WERN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SBSW as "Hold", PAL as "Buy", CVLG as "Hold", SA as "Buy", WERN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 63.5% upside for PAL (target: $12) vs -0.8% for WERN (target: $36). For income investors, WERN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.55% vs SBSW's 0.18%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.27 | $12.00 | — | — | $36.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 4 | 9 | 4 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — | +0.9% | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 4 | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | — | $0.29 | — | $0.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.4% | 0.0% | +2.5% |
SBSW leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PAL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SBSW vs PAL vs CVLG vs SA vs WERN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SBSW or PAL or CVLG or SA or WERN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.
Common Stock (PAL) is the stronger pick with 78. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 8% for Werner Enterprises, Inc. (WERN). Covenant Logistics Group, Inc. (CVLG) offers the better valuation at 122. 9x trailing P/E (19. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock (PAL) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SBSW or PAL or CVLG or SA or WERN?
On forward P/E, Sibanye Stillwater Limited is actually cheaper at 0.
2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SBSW or PAL or CVLG or SA or WERN?
Over the past 5 years, Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.
(CVLG) delivered a total return of +192. 6%, compared to -50. 2% for Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock (PAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CVLG returned +234. 5% versus PAL's -50. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SBSW or PAL or CVLG or SA or WERN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seabridge Gold Inc.
(SA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 21β versus Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 58β — meaning PAL is approximately 114% more volatile than SA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock (PAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 100% for Sibanye Stillwater Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SBSW or PAL or CVLG or SA or WERN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc.
Common Stock (PAL) is pulling ahead at 78. 7% versus -1. 8% for Werner Enterprises, Inc. (WERN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sibanye Stillwater Limited grew EPS 34. 1% year-over-year, compared to -157. 4% for Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, CVLG leads at -1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SBSW or PAL or CVLG or SA or WERN?
Covenant Logistics Group, Inc.
(CVLG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 6% net margin versus -7. 8% for Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 0. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SBSW leads at 18. 5% versus 0. 0% for SA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SBSW leads at 23. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SBSW or PAL or CVLG or SA or WERN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sibanye Stillwater Limited (SBSW) trades at 0.
2x forward P/E versus 39. 8x for Werner Enterprises, Inc. — 39. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAL: 63. 5% to $12. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SBSW or PAL or CVLG or SA or WERN?
In this comparison, WERN (1.
5% yield), CVLG (0. 9% yield), SBSW (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. PAL, SA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SBSW or PAL or CVLG or SA or WERN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Werner Enterprises, Inc.
(WERN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 24), 1. 5% yield). Proficient Auto Logistics, Inc. Common Stock (PAL) carries a higher beta of 2. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WERN: +78. 1%, PAL: -50. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SBSW and PAL and CVLG and SA and WERN?
These companies operate in different sectors (SBSW (Basic Materials) and PAL (Industrials) and CVLG (Industrials) and SA (Basic Materials) and WERN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SBSW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CVLG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WERN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CVLG, WERN pay a dividend while SBSW, PAL, SA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.