SBXD
SilverBox Corp IV
Shell Companies
Market Cap$275M
5Y Perf.—
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SBXD vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BFLY
Butterfly Network, Inc.
Medical - Devices
Market Cap$1.09B
5Y Perf.+281.7%
SONO
Sonos, Inc.
Consumer Electronics
Market Cap$1.82B
5Y Perf.+23.0%
PSFE
Paysafe Limited
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$480M
5Y Perf.-58.6%
SBXD vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SBXD | BFLY | SONO | PSFE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Medical - Devices | Consumer Electronics | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $275M | $1.09B | $1.82B | $480M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $103M | $1.46B | $1.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-76M | $-41M | $-183M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.2% | 44.8% | 52.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | -79.5% | 2.0% | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | 77.1x | — | 47.8x | 4.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $20M | $60M | $2.66B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $819K | $150M | $175M | $1.35B |
SBXD vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SBXD
BFLY
SONO
PSFE
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SilverBox Corp IV (SBXD) | 100 | Infinity | +Infinity% |
| Butterfly Network, … (BFLY) | 100 | 381.7 | +281.7% |
| Sonos, Inc. (SONO) | 100 | 123.0 | +23.0% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SBXD vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SBXD and BFLY are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Butterfly Network, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. SONO and PSFE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SBXD
SilverBox Corp IV
The Banking Pick
SBXD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 1.8% margin vs BFLY's -73.6%
- 1.7% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6%
Best for: quality and efficiency
BFLY
Butterfly Network, Inc.
The Growth Play
BFLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 8.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
- 19.0% revenue growth vs SONO's -4.9%
- +83.3% vs PSFE's -39.7%
Best for: growth exposure
SONO
Sonos, Inc.
The Income Pick
SONO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.72
- -24.4% 10Y total return vs BFLY's -58.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.72, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 1.43x
- Beta 1.72, current ratio 1.43x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
PSFE
Paysafe Limited
The Value Play
PSFE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.3x vs 47.8x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BFLY | 19.0% revenue growth vs SONO's -4.9% |
| Value | PSFE | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 47.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | SBXD | 1.8% margin vs BFLY's -73.6% |
| Stability / Safety | SONO | Beta 1.72 vs BFLY's 3.23 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | BFLY | +83.3% vs PSFE's -39.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SBXD | 1.7% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6% |
SBXD vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
SBXD vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSBXDLAGGINGSONO
Who Leads Where
PSFE leads in 1 of 6 categories
BFLY leads 1 • SBXD leads 1 • SONO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓SONOSonos, Inc.
0leads
PSFEPaysafe Limited
1leads
BFLYButterfly Network, In…
1leads
SBXDSilverBox Corp IV
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BFLYvs PSFEMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PSFE5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BFLY3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SBXD2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BFLY and SONO and PSFE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSFE and SBXD operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. SONO is the more profitable business, keeping -2.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BFLY's -73.6%. On growth, BFLY holds the edge at +25.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SBXDSilverBox Corp IV | BFLYButterfly Network… | SONOSonos, Inc. | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $103M | $1.5B | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$76M | $61M | $371M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$76M | -$41M | -$183M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$19M | $118M | $136M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +49.2% | +44.8% | +52.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -79.5% | +2.0% | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -73.6% | -2.8% | -10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -18.3% | +8.1% | +8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +25.0% | +8.4% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.0% | -29.3% | -183.3% |
Evenly matched — BFLY and SONO and PSFE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PSFE's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SONO's 143.7x.
| Metric | SBXDSilverBox Corp IV | BFLYButterfly Network… | SONOSonos, Inc. | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $275M | $1.1B | $1.8B | $480M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $274M | $958M | $1.7B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 77.07x | -13.42x | -29.51x | -2.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 47.77x | 4.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 78.62x | — | 143.75x | 4.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 11.15x | 1.26x | 0.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 5.25x | 5.12x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 16.81x | 2.14x |
PSFE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SBXD and PSFE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SBXD delivers a 1.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-37 for BFLY. BFLY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSFE's 4.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SONO scores 4/9 vs BFLY's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | SBXDSilverBox Corp IV | BFLYButterfly Network… | SONOSonos, Inc. | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.8% | -36.8% | -10.4% | -24.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.7% | -25.6% | -4.8% | -3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -76.8% | -13.4% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | -39.3% | -9.9% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.10x | 0.17x | 4.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$819,362 | -$130M | -$115M | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $819,362 | $150M | $175M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $20M | $60M | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -71.59x | 2587.88x | 0.84x |
Evenly matched — SBXD and PSFE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BFLY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SONO five years ago would be worth $4,318 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $570 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, BFLY leads with a +83.3% total return vs PSFE's -39.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BFLY at 25.4% vs PSFE's -13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SBXDSilverBox Corp IV | BFLYButterfly Network… | SONOSonos, Inc. | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.1% | +10.9% | -14.0% | +16.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.2% | +83.3% | +52.9% | -39.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +97.2% | -30.9% | -35.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -62.9% | -56.8% | -94.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -58.0% | -24.4% | -92.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +25.4% | -11.6% | -13.7% |
BFLY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBXD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SBXD is the less volatile stock with a -0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFLY's 3.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBXD currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs PSFE's 56.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SBXDSilverBox Corp IV | BFLYButterfly Network… | SONOSonos, Inc. | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.05x | 3.23x | 1.72x | 2.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.64 | $5.72 | $19.82 | $16.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.33 | $1.32 | $9.23 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.7% | +72.7% | +75.9% | +56.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.0 | 41.6 | 57.5 | 66.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 35K | 5.2M | 1.3M | 354K |
SBXD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BFLY as "Buy", SONO as "Buy", PSFE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.3% upside for BFLY (target: $5) vs 7.8% for PSFE (target: $10).
| Metric | SBXDSilverBox Corp IV | BFLYButterfly Network… | SONOSonos, Inc. | PSFEPaysafe Limited |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.42 | $19.50 | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 9 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.5% | +21.1% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
PSFE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). BFLY leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallSilverBox Corp IV (SBXD)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SBXD vs BFLY vs SONO vs PSFE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SBXD or BFLY or SONO or PSFE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Butterfly Network, Inc.
(BFLY) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Sonos, Inc. (SONO). SilverBox Corp IV (SBXD) offers the better valuation at 77. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SBXD or BFLY or SONO or PSFE?
On forward P/E, Paysafe Limited is actually cheaper at 4.
3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SBXD or BFLY or SONO or PSFE?
Over the past 5 years, Sonos, Inc.
(SONO) delivered a total return of -56. 8%, compared to -94. 3% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SONO returned -24. 4% versus PSFE's -92. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SBXD or BFLY or SONO or PSFE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SilverBox Corp IV (SBXD) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
05β versus Butterfly Network, Inc. 's 3. 23β — meaning BFLY is approximately -7232% more volatile than SBXD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 4% for Paysafe Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SBXD or BFLY or SONO or PSFE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Butterfly Network, Inc.
(BFLY) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -4. 9% for Sonos, Inc. (SONO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Butterfly Network, Inc. grew EPS 8. 8% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, BFLY leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SBXD or BFLY or SONO or PSFE?
SilverBox Corp IV (SBXD) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -79. 0% for Butterfly Network, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSFE leads at 7. 2% versus -88. 5% for BFLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BFLY leads at 46. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SBXD or BFLY or SONO or PSFE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Paysafe Limited (PSFE) trades at 4.
3x forward P/E versus 47. 8x for Sonos, Inc. — 43. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BFLY: 30. 3% to $5. 42.
08Which pays a better dividend — SBXD or BFLY or SONO or PSFE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SBXD or BFLY or SONO or PSFE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SilverBox Corp IV (SBXD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
05)). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 33 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SBXD and BFLY and SONO and PSFE?
These companies operate in different sectors (SBXD (Financial Services) and BFLY (Healthcare) and SONO (Technology) and PSFE (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SBXD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BFLY is a small-cap high-growth stock; SONO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PSFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.