REIT - Industrial
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SCCF vs RC vs ACRE vs GPMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
SCCF vs RC vs ACRE vs GPMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $1.14B | $357M | $280M | $74M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-13M | $499M | $55M | $132M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-229M | $-20M | $-40M |
| Gross Margin | — | -0.0% | 46.3% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -50.5% | 44.6% | -4.3% |
| Forward P/E | 400.0x | — | 16.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $5.86B | $1.05B | $1.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $248M | $29M | $66M |
SCCF vs RC vs ACRE vs GPMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCF) | 100 | 97.6 | -2.4% |
| Ready Capital Corpo… (RC) | 100 | 14.7 | -85.3% |
| Ares Commercial Rea… (ACRE) | 100 | 34.4 | -65.6% |
| Granite Point Mortg… (GPMT) | 100 | 14.1 | -85.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SCCF vs RC vs ACRE vs GPMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SCCF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for stability and momentum.
- Beta 0.66 vs GPMT's 1.44
- +33.5% vs RC's -44.9%
- 0.4% ROA vs RC's -2.6%
RC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 31.4%
- Beta 1.17, yield 31.4%, current ratio 1.04x
- 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs SCCF's -100.0%
- 31.4% yield, vs SCCF's 0.8%
ACRE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 43.3% 10Y total return vs SCCF's 25.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, current ratio 0.08x
- Better valuation composite
GPMT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 187.8%, EPS growth 73.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.9%
- -30.5% margin vs RC's -45.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs SCCF's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -30.5% margin vs RC's -45.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs GPMT's 1.44 | |
| Dividends | 31.4% yield, vs SCCF's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.5% vs RC's -44.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.4% ROA vs RC's -2.6% |
SCCF vs RC vs ACRE vs GPMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SCCF vs RC vs ACRE vs GPMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SCCF leads in 2 of 6 categories
GPMT leads 1 • ACRE leads 1 • RC leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RC and SCCF operate at a comparable scale, with $499M and -$13M in trailing revenue. GPMT is the more profitable business, keeping -30.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -45.8%. On growth, RC holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$13M | $499M | $55M | $132M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $133,999 | -$249M | $31M | -$8M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | -$229M | -$20M | -$40M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $303M | -$44M | $463,000 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -0.0% | +46.3% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -50.5% | +44.6% | -4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -45.8% | -36.3% | -30.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +60.6% | -80.3% | +0.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | +8.7% | -10.0% | +157.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -80.6% | +24.9% | -2.0% | +40.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ACRE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ACRE's 18.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RC's 48.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $357M | $280M | $74M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $6.0B | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 599.95x | -1.50x | -307.93x | -1.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 399.97x | — | 16.34x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 48.25x | 18.49x | 20.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.71x | 3.28x | 0.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.43x | 0.22x | 0.54x | 0.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 457.74x | — | 14.18x | 27.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SCCF and ACRE each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCF delivers a 1.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-12 for RC. ACRE carries lower financial leverage with a 2.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RC's 3.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GPMT scores 6/9 vs ACRE's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.0% | -12.2% | -3.9% | -7.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | -2.6% | -1.3% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +1.2% | +2.9% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +1.4% | +5.8% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.55x | 2.06x | 2.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$11M | $5.6B | $1.0B | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $248M | $29M | $66M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $5.9B | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.41x | 0.95x | 0.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SCCF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCCF five years ago would be worth $12,544 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,472 for GPMT. Over the past 12 months, SCCF leads with a +33.5% total return vs RC's -44.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SCCF at 11.8% vs RC's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.9% | +1.4% | +9.9% | -32.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.5% | -44.9% | +20.7% | -19.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.6% | -54.4% | -4.4% | -34.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.4% | -44.4% | -29.5% | -65.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.4% | +6.1% | +43.3% | -50.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.8% | -23.1% | -1.5% | -13.1% |
Risk & Volatility
SCCF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SCCF is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPMT's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SCCF currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs RC's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 1.17x | 0.99x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.00 | $4.75 | $5.89 | $3.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.81 | $1.51 | $4.05 | $1.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +45.5% | +85.7% | +49.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 64.1 | 53.4 | 49.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 2.1M | 396K | 154K |
Analyst Outlook
RC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RC as "Buy", ACRE as "Buy", GPMT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 61.3% upside for GPMT (target: $3) vs -1.0% for ACRE (target: $5). For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 31.37% vs SCCF's 0.84%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.50 | $5.00 | $2.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 13 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +31.4% | +14.1% | +14.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $0.68 | $0.71 | $0.22 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +18.9% | 0.0% | +7.6% |
SCCF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). GPMT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
SCCF vs RC vs ACRE vs GPMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCCF or RC or ACRE or GPMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is the stronger pick with 1726% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100.
0% for Sachem Capital Corp. 7. 125% Not (SCCF). Sachem Capital Corp. 7. 125% Not (SCCF) offers the better valuation at 600. 0x trailing P/E (400. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ready Capital Corporation (RC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCCF or RC or ACRE or GPMT?
On forward P/E, Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation is actually cheaper at 16.
3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCCF or RC or ACRE or GPMT?
Over the past 5 years, Sachem Capital Corp.
7. 125% Not (SCCF) delivered a total return of +25. 4%, compared to -65. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACRE returned +43. 3% versus GPMT's -50. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCCF or RC or ACRE or GPMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sachem Capital Corp.
7. 125% Not (SCCF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning GPMT is approximately 117% more volatile than SCCF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 4% for Ready Capital Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SCCF or RC or ACRE or GPMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is pulling ahead at 1726% versus -100.
0% for Sachem Capital Corp. 7. 125% Not (SCCF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sachem Capital Corp. 7. 125% Not grew EPS 104. 3% year-over-year, compared to 45. 2% for Ready Capital Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GPMT leads at 22. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SCCF or RC or ACRE or GPMT?
Sachem Capital Corp.
7. 125% Not (SCCF) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -45. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACRE leads at 72. 4% versus 0. 0% for SCCF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RC leads at 87. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SCCF or RC or ACRE or GPMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ares Commercial Real Estate Corporation (ACRE) trades at 16.
3x forward P/E versus 400. 0x for Sachem Capital Corp. 7. 125% Not — 383. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GPMT: 61. 3% to $2. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SCCF or RC or ACRE or GPMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ready Capital Corporation (RC) offers the highest yield at 31. 4%, versus 0. 8% for Sachem Capital Corp. 7. 125% Not (SCCF).
09Is SCCF or RC or ACRE or GPMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sachem Capital Corp.
7. 125% Not (SCCF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 0. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCCF: +25. 4%, GPMT: -50. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SCCF and RC and ACRE and GPMT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SCCF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACRE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GPMT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.