REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SCCG vs GPMT vs TPVG vs RC vs LOAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
Asset Management
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
SCCG vs GPMT vs TPVG vs RC vs LOAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | Asset Management | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $1.14B | $74M | $243M | $357M | $48M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $132M | $97M | $499M | $8M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-40M | $-12M | $-229M | $5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.3% | 83.5% | -0.0% | 99.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -4.3% | 77.9% | -50.5% | 58.1% |
| Forward P/E | 397.8x | — | 6.5x | — | 8.6x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.17B | $469M | $5.86B | $23M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $66M | $20M | $248M | $178K |
SCCG vs GPMT vs TPVG vs RC vs LOAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCG) | 100 | 96.1 | -3.9% |
| Granite Point Mortg… (GPMT) | 100 | 16.5 | -83.5% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 44.7 | -55.3% |
| Ready Capital Corpo… (RC) | 100 | 16.5 | -83.5% |
| Manhattan Bridge Ca… (LOAN) | 100 | 75.0 | -25.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SCCG vs GPMT vs TPVG vs RC vs LOAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SCCG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.09, yield 0.8%
- Beta 0.09 vs GPMT's 1.44
- +28.8% vs RC's -44.9%
GPMT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 187.8%, EPS growth 73.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.9%
TPVG is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
RC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and dividends is your priority.
- 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs SCCG's -100.0%
- 31.4% yield, vs LOAN's 10.8%
LOAN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 102.8% 10Y total return vs SCCG's 24.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 52.1%, current ratio 31.09x
- Beta 0.12, yield 10.8%, current ratio 31.09x
- 70.0% margin vs RC's -45.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.3% FFO/revenue growth vs SCCG's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 70.0% margin vs RC's -45.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.09 vs GPMT's 1.44 | |
| Dividends | 31.4% yield, vs LOAN's 10.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.8% vs RC's -44.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs RC's -2.6%, ROIC 8.5% vs 1.2% |
SCCG vs GPMT vs TPVG vs RC vs LOAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LOAN leads in 2 of 6 categories
SCCG leads 2 • RC leads 1 • GPMT leads 0 • TPVG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RC and SCCG operate at a comparable scale, with $499M and $0 in trailing revenue. LOAN is the more profitable business, keeping 70.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RC's -45.8%. On growth, RC holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $132M | $97M | $499M | $8M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | -$8M | -$22M | -$249M | $4M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | -$40M | -$12M | -$229M | $5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $463,000 | $35M | $303M | $5M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +47.3% | +83.5% | -0.0% | +99.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -4.3% | +77.9% | -50.5% | +58.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -30.5% | +50.6% | -45.8% | +70.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +0.4% | -58.7% | +60.6% | +62.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | +157.8% | — | +8.7% | +14.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.4% | +40.9% | -2.3% | +24.9% | -8.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GPMT and LOAN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 99% valuation discount to SCCG's 596.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LOAN's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RC's 48.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $74M | $243M | $357M | $48M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $1.2B | $691M | $6.0B | $71M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 596.75x | -1.34x | 4.91x | -1.50x | 8.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 397.83x | — | 6.50x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.84x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.75x | 9.13x | 48.25x | 8.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.51x | 2.50x | 0.71x | 4.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.40x | 0.13x | 0.68x | 0.22x | 1.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 455.30x | 27.85x | — | — | 9.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOAN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LOAN delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-12 for RC. LOAN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RC's 3.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOAN scores 7/9 vs RC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.0% | -7.1% | -3.4% | -12.2% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | -2.3% | -1.5% | -2.6% | +8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +2.6% | +7.2% | +1.2% | +8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +4.6% | +9.4% | +1.4% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.12x | 1.33x | 3.55x | 0.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$11M | $1.1B | $449M | $5.6B | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $66M | $20M | $248M | $178,012 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.2B | $469M | $5.9B | $23M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.58x | -1.02x | 0.41x | 3.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SCCG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCCG five years ago would be worth $12,430 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,472 for GPMT. Over the past 12 months, SCCG leads with a +28.8% total return vs RC's -44.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SCCG at 10.9% vs RC's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.6% | -32.5% | -6.3% | +1.4% | -6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.8% | -19.7% | +19.3% | -44.9% | -8.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.4% | -34.3% | -3.4% | -54.4% | +16.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.3% | -65.3% | -13.5% | -44.4% | +2.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.3% | -50.0% | +93.3% | +6.1% | +102.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.9% | -13.1% | -1.2% | -23.1% | +5.2% |
Risk & Volatility
SCCG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SCCG is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPMT's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SCCG currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs RC's 45.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.09x | 1.44x | 0.83x | 1.17x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.55 | $3.12 | $7.53 | $4.75 | $5.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.58 | $1.24 | $4.48 | $1.51 | $4.13 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +49.7% | +79.5% | +45.5% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 49.4 | 58.3 | 64.1 | 36.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 154K | 504K | 2.1M | 28K |
Analyst Outlook
RC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GPMT as "Hold", TPVG as "Hold", RC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.3% upside for GPMT (target: $3) vs 15.7% for RC (target: $3). For income investors, RC offers the higher dividend yield at 31.37% vs SCCG's 0.85%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.50 | $8.95 | $2.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 12 | 16 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +14.0% | +17.1% | +31.4% | +10.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $0.22 | $1.02 | $0.68 | $0.46 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.6% | 0.0% | +18.9% | +0.0% |
LOAN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SCCG leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
SCCG vs GPMT vs TPVG vs RC vs LOAN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCCG or GPMT or TPVG or RC or LOAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is the stronger pick with 1726% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100.
0% for Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note (SCCG). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ready Capital Corporation (RC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCCG or GPMT or TPVG or RC or LOAN?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note at 596. 8x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCCG or GPMT or TPVG or RC or LOAN?
Over the past 5 years, Sachem Capital Corp.
8. 00% Note (SCCG) delivered a total return of +24. 3%, compared to -65. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOAN returned +102. 8% versus GPMT's -50. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCCG or GPMT or TPVG or RC or LOAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sachem Capital Corp.
8. 00% Note (SCCG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 09β versus Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning GPMT is approximately 1436% more volatile than SCCG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 4% for Ready Capital Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SCCG or GPMT or TPVG or RC or LOAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ready Capital Corporation (RC) is pulling ahead at 1726% versus -100.
0% for Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note (SCCG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note grew EPS 104. 3% year-over-year, compared to 2. 1% for Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GPMT leads at 22. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SCCG or GPMT or TPVG or RC or LOAN?
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
(LOAN) is the more profitable company, earning 57. 7% net margin versus -45. 8% for Ready Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 57. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOAN leads at 81. 6% versus 0. 0% for SCCG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RC leads at 87. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SCCG or GPMT or TPVG or RC or LOAN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 397. 8x for Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note — 391. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GPMT: 61. 3% to $2. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SCCG or GPMT or TPVG or RC or LOAN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ready Capital Corporation (RC) offers the highest yield at 31. 4%, versus 0. 8% for Sachem Capital Corp. 8. 00% Note (SCCG).
09Is SCCG or GPMT or TPVG or RC or LOAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
(LOAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 10. 8% yield, +102. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LOAN: +102. 8%, GPMT: -50. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SCCG and GPMT and TPVG and RC and LOAN?
These companies operate in different sectors (SCCG (Real Estate) and GPMT (Real Estate) and TPVG (Financial Services) and RC (Real Estate) and LOAN (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SCCG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GPMT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; RC is a small-cap high-growth stock; LOAN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.