Technology Distributors
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SCSC vs CNXN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Technology Distributors
SCSC vs CNXN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $952M | $1.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.09B | $2.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $73M | $87M |
| Gross Margin | 13.5% | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | 3.1% | 3.9% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 16.6x |
| Total Debt | $147M | $996K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $126M | $193M |
SCSC vs CNXN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) | 100 | 176.1 | +76.1% |
| PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) | 100 | 151.0 | +51.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SCSC vs CNXN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SCSC is the clearest fit if your priority is value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 16.6x)
- +20.2% vs CNXN's -2.4%
CNXN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth 2.5%, EPS growth -0.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.8%
- 199.0% 10Y total return vs SCSC's 9.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.5% revenue growth vs SCSC's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 16.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.0% margin vs SCSC's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs SCSC's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.2% vs CNXN's -2.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs SCSC's 4.2%, ROIC 10.6% vs 7.0% |
SCSC vs CNXN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SCSC vs CNXN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNXN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCSC and CNXN operate at a comparable scale, with $3.1B and $2.9B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.0% (CNXN) to 2.4% (SCSC). On growth, SCSC holds the edge at +8.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $114M | $127M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $73M | $87M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $124M | $124M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | +18.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +3.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +4.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.8% | +3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +33.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SCSC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, SCSC trades at a 28% valuation discount to CNXN's 20.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SCSC's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CNXN's 12.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $952M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $973M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.47x | 19.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.98x | 16.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.21x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.43x | 12.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.31x | 0.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 1.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.15x | 28.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CNXN leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CNXN delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $8 for SCSC. CNXN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCSC's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCSC scores 7/9 vs CNXN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +9.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.0% | +10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.7% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21M | -$192M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $126M | $193M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $147M | $996,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.00x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CNXN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CNXN five years ago would be worth $14,507 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,433 for SCSC. Over the past 12 months, SCSC leads with a +20.2% total return vs CNXN's -2.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNXN at 19.8% vs SCSC's 18.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.1% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.2% | -2.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.5% | +71.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.3% | +45.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.7% | +199.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.0% | +19.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SCSC and CNXN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNXN is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SCSC's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.25 | $71.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.76 | $54.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.8% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.3 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 204K | 66K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SCSC as "Hold" and CNXN as "Buy". CNXN is the only dividend payer here at 0.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +11.2% | +4.6% |
CNXN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SCSC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SCSC vs CNXN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCSC or CNXN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) is the stronger pick with 2. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCSC or CNXN?
On trailing P/E, ScanSource, Inc.
(SCSC) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus PC Connection, Inc. at 20. 0x. On forward P/E, ScanSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCSC or CNXN?
Over the past 5 years, PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) delivered a total return of +45. 1%, compared to +34. 3% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNXN returned +199. 0% versus SCSC's +9. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCSC or CNXN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus ScanSource, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning SCSC is approximately 78% more volatile than CNXN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 16% for ScanSource, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SCSC or CNXN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) is pulling ahead at 2. 5% versus -6. 7% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PC Connection, Inc. grew EPS -0. 6% year-over-year, compared to -2. 0% for ScanSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CNXN leads at -2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SCSC or CNXN?
PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 9% net margin versus 2. 4% for ScanSource, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNXN leads at 3. 6% versus 2. 8% for SCSC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNXN leads at 18. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SCSC or CNXN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ScanSource, Inc.
(SCSC) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 16. 6x for PC Connection, Inc. — 5. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — SCSC or CNXN?
In this comparison, CNXN (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. SCSC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SCSC or CNXN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 0. 9% yield, +199. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNXN: +199. 0%, SCSC: +9. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SCSC and CNXN?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SCSC is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNXN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CNXN pays a dividend while SCSC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.