Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SDA vs KXIN vs OPEN vs ACMR vs CVNA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Real Estate - Services
Semiconductors
Auto - Dealerships
SDA vs KXIN vs OPEN vs ACMR vs CVNA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Real Estate - Services | Semiconductors | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $49M | $5M | $3.84B | $3.96B | $84.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $467M | $95K | $3.94B | $960M | $22.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $-66M | $-1.39B | $91M | $1.60B |
| Gross Margin | 22.1% | -20.4% | 7.9% | 44.2% | 20.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | -303.1% | -9.9% | 12.5% | 9.2% |
| Forward P/E | 8.8x | — | — | 30.8x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $84M | $1M | $193M | $303M | $633M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $2M | $962M | $766M | $2.33B |
SDA vs KXIN vs OPEN vs ACMR vs CVNA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SunCar Technology G… (SDA) | 100 | 10.8 | -89.2% |
| Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 24.7 | -75.3% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 227.4 | +127.4% |
| Carvana Co. (CVNA) | 100 | 136.6 | +36.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SDA vs KXIN vs OPEN vs ACMR vs CVNA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SDA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and stability.
- Lower P/E (8.8x vs 10.0x)
- Beta 0.69 vs ACMR's 3.17
Among these 5 stocks, KXIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +474.5% vs KXIN's -98.9%
ACMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and dividends is your priority.
- 9.5% margin vs KXIN's -694.9%
- 0.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
CVNA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.89
- Rev growth 48.6%, EPS growth 431.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.3%
- 34.1% 10Y total return vs ACMR's 31.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.89, Low D/E 15.1%, current ratio 4.31x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.6% revenue growth vs KXIN's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 10.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.5% margin vs KXIN's -694.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs ACMR's 3.17 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +474.5% vs KXIN's -98.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.8% ROA vs KXIN's -317.8%, ROIC 34.3% vs -36.0% |
SDA vs KXIN vs OPEN vs ACMR vs CVNA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SDA vs KXIN vs OPEN vs ACMR vs CVNA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories
CVNA leads 2 • SDA leads 0 • KXIN leads 0 • OPEN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVNA is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.5B annually — 237073.7x KXIN's $95,000. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 9.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KXIN's -694.9%. On growth, CVNA holds the edge at +52.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $467M | $95,000 | $3.9B | $960M | $22.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | -$24M | -$363M | $133M | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | -$66M | -$1.4B | $91M | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$693,001 | -$3M | $1.1B | -$108M | $740M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.1% | -20.4% | +7.9% | +44.2% | +20.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | -303.1% | -9.9% | +12.5% | +9.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | -694.9% | -35.2% | +9.5% | +7.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.1% | -32.4% | +27.2% | -11.3% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.6% | — | -37.6% | +34.2% | +52.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +104.1% | +88.7% | -50.0% | -20.0% | +11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SDA and OPEN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 43.7x trailing earnings, ACMR trades at a 5% valuation discount to CVNA's 46.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACMR's 27.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CVNA's 38.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $49M | $5M | $3.8B | $4.0B | $84.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $107M | $4M | $3.1B | $3.5B | $82.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.47x | -0.10x | -2.95x | 43.69x | 46.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.83x | — | — | 30.81x | 9.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.23x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 27.83x | 38.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | — | 0.88x | 4.40x | 4.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.54x | 0.31x | 3.82x | 2.09x | 20.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.40x | — | 3.70x | — | 95.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CVNA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CVNA delivers a 45.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-6 for KXIN. KXIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SDA's 1.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CVNA scores 6/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.6% | -5.9% | -163.2% | +5.1% | +45.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | -3.2% | -53.6% | +3.4% | +13.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -35.7% | -36.0% | -15.8% | +7.0% | +34.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -61.8% | -44.5% | -11.7% | +6.6% | +20.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.27x | 0.08x | 0.19x | 0.16x | 0.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $57M | -$1M | -$769M | -$463M | -$1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $2M | $962M | $766M | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $84M | $1M | $193M | $303M | $633M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.54x | -88.45x | -8.92x | 20.41x | -0.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CVNA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $26,731 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for KXIN. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +474.5% total return vs KXIN's -98.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVNA at 2.3% vs KXIN's -96.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -48.5% | -94.9% | -17.5% | +33.4% | -2.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -60.7% | -98.9% | +474.5% | +166.8% | +36.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.6% | -100.0% | +144.4% | +494.3% | +3348.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.2% | -100.0% | -70.1% | +167.3% | +60.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.2% | -100.0% | -53.6% | +3100.5% | +3410.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.5% | -96.7% | +34.7% | +81.1% | +2.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SDA and ACMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SDA is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACMR currently trades 83.5% from its 52-week high vs KXIN's 0.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.69x | 2.13x | 3.05x | 3.17x | 1.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.65 | $832.50 | $10.87 | $71.65 | $486.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.03 | $4.10 | $0.51 | $19.76 | $53.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.0% | +0.5% | +46.1% | +83.5% | +16.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 17.0 | 32.4 | 53.2 | 66.3 | 61.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 301K | 52K | 36.3M | 1.1M | 14.9M |
Analyst Outlook
ACMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SDA as "Buy", OPEN as "Hold", ACMR as "Buy", CVNA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 521.0% upside for CVNA (target: $484) vs 23.2% for OPEN (target: $6). ACMR is the only dividend payer here at 0.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | — | $6.17 | $75.00 | $484.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — | 26 | 10 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.11 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
ACMR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). CVNA leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
SDA vs KXIN vs OPEN vs ACMR vs CVNA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SDA or KXIN or OPEN or ACMR or CVNA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Carvana Co.
(CVNA) is the stronger pick with 48. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) offers the better valuation at 43. 7x trailing P/E (30. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SunCar Technology Group Inc. (SDA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SDA or KXIN or OPEN or ACMR or CVNA?
On trailing P/E, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the cheapest at 43. 7x versus Carvana Co. at 46. 1x. On forward P/E, SunCar Technology Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SDA or KXIN or OPEN or ACMR or CVNA?
Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) delivered a total return of +167. 3%, compared to -100. 0% for Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CVNA returned +34. 1% versus KXIN's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SDA or KXIN or OPEN or ACMR or CVNA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SunCar Technology Group Inc.
(SDA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 69β versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 3. 17β — meaning ACMR is approximately 356% more volatile than SDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 127% for SunCar Technology Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SDA or KXIN or OPEN or ACMR or CVNA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Carvana Co.
(CVNA) is pulling ahead at 48. 6% versus -100. 0% for Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carvana Co. grew EPS 431. 4% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SDA or KXIN or OPEN or ACMR or CVNA?
ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -694. 9% for Kaixin Auto Holdings — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACMR leads at 12. 1% versus -303. 1% for KXIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACMR leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SDA or KXIN or OPEN or ACMR or CVNA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SunCar Technology Group Inc.
(SDA) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 30. 8x for ACM Research, Inc. — 22. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVNA: 521. 0% to $484. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SDA or KXIN or OPEN or ACMR or CVNA?
In this comparison, ACMR (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. SDA, KXIN, OPEN, CVNA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SDA or KXIN or OPEN or ACMR or CVNA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SunCar Technology Group Inc.
(SDA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 69)). Kaixin Auto Holdings (KXIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SDA: -89. 2%, KXIN: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SDA and KXIN and OPEN and ACMR and CVNA?
These companies operate in different sectors (SDA (Consumer Cyclical) and KXIN (Consumer Cyclical) and OPEN (Real Estate) and ACMR (Technology) and CVNA (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SDA is a small-cap high-growth stock; KXIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; CVNA is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.