Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SDOT vs AGRO vs VITL vs HGTY vs FLXS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SDOT
Sadot Group Inc.

Agricultural Farm Products

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$334K
5Y Perf.-99.8%
AGRO
Adecoagro S.A.

Agricultural Farm Products

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • LU
Market Cap$6.89B
5Y Perf.+33.2%
VITL
Vital Farms, Inc.

Agricultural Farm Products

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$426M
5Y Perf.-52.3%
HGTY
Hagerty, Inc.

Insurance - Property & Casualty

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.54B
5Y Perf.+4.6%
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$295M
5Y Perf.+36.6%

SDOT vs AGRO vs VITL vs HGTY vs FLXS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SDOT logoSDOT
AGRO logoAGRO
VITL logoVITL
HGTY logoHGTY
FLXS logoFLXS
IndustryAgricultural Farm ProductsAgricultural Farm ProductsAgricultural Farm ProductsInsurance - Property & CasualtyFurnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$334K$6.89B$426M$3.54B$295M
Revenue (TTM)$247M$1.43B$784M$1.42B$458M
Net Income (TTM)$-93M$-8M$48M$12M$22M
Gross Margin-9.2%23.4%35.2%62.9%23.2%
Operating Margin-27.4%4.4%8.2%6.0%6.1%
Forward P/E6.9x10.4x100.9x11.9x
Total Debt$10M$1.95B$53M$233M$59M
Cash & Equiv.$653K$383M$49M$299M$40M

SDOT vs AGRO vs VITL vs HGTY vs FLXSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SDOT
AGRO
VITL
HGTY
FLXS
StockJun 21May 26Return
Sadot Group Inc. (SDOT)1000.2-99.8%
Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO)100133.2+33.2%
Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL)10047.7-52.3%
Hagerty, Inc. (HGTY)100104.6+4.6%
Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS)100136.6+36.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SDOT vs AGRO vs VITL vs HGTY vs FLXS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: VITL leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Adecoagro S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. FLXS also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SDOT
Sadot Group Inc.
The Consumer Defensive Pick

SDOT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
AGRO
Adecoagro S.A.
The Value Play

AGRO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (6.9x vs 100.9x)
  • 0.5% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs FLXS's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: value and dividends
VITL
Vital Farms, Inc.
The Growth Play

VITL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 25.3%, EPS growth 22.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 15.2%, current ratio 2.16x
  • 25.3% revenue growth vs SDOT's -64.8%
  • 6.1% margin vs SDOT's -37.8%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
HGTY
Hagerty, Inc.
The Insurance Play

Among these 5 stocks, HGTY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
The Income Pick

FLXS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.51, yield 1.1%
  • 51.4% 10Y total return vs AGRO's 39.9%
  • Beta 1.51, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.78x
  • +80.1% vs SDOT's -97.4%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthVITL logoVITL25.3% revenue growth vs SDOT's -64.8%
ValueAGRO logoAGROLower P/E (6.9x vs 100.9x)
Quality / MarginsVITL logoVITL6.1% margin vs SDOT's -37.8%
Stability / SafetyVITL logoVITLBeta 0.31 vs FLXS's 1.51, lower leverage
DividendsAGRO logoAGRO0.5% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs FLXS's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)FLXS logoFLXS+80.1% vs SDOT's -97.4%
Efficiency (ROA)VITL logoVITL10.0% ROA vs SDOT's -128.7%

SDOT vs AGRO vs VITL vs HGTY vs FLXS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SDOTSadot Group Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

AGROAdecoagro S.A.
FY 2024
Manufactured Products And Services Rendered
53.5%$1.5B
Sugar
13.8%$392M
Ethanol
9.3%$265M
Rice
7.9%$224M
Fluid Milk (UHT)
4.8%$137M
Other Dairy Products
2.7%$78M
Peanut
2.1%$59M
Other (7)
5.8%$163M
VITLVital Farms, Inc.
FY 2025
Eggs And Egg Related Products
96.5%$733M
Butter And Butter Related Products
3.5%$26M
HGTYHagerty, Inc.
FY 2025
Commission Revenue And Fee Revenue
85.5%$486M
Membership And Other Revenue
14.5%$82M
FLXSFlexsteel Industries, Inc.
FY 2023
Residential
100.0%$394M

SDOT vs AGRO vs VITL vs HGTY vs FLXS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLVITLLAGGINGHGTY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

VITL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

AGRO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 5.8x SDOT's $247M. VITL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SDOT's -37.8%. On growth, VITL holds the edge at +15.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSDOT logoSDOTSadot Group Inc.AGRO logoAGROAdecoagro S.A.VITL logoVITLVital Farms, Inc.HGTY logoHGTYHagerty, Inc.FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$247M$1.4B$784M$1.4B$458M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$68M$335M$78M$113M$31M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$93M-$8M$48M$12M$22M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$5M$37M-$90M$165M$28M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-9.2%+23.4%+35.2%+62.9%+23.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-27.4%+4.4%+8.2%+6.0%+6.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-37.8%-0.5%+6.1%+0.8%+4.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.0%+2.6%-11.4%+11.6%+6.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-99.9%+11.1%+15.4%-2.4%+9.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-37.7%-162.5%-108.1%-191.2%-27.2%
VITL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — AGRO and VITL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 6.6x trailing earnings, VITL trades at a 76% valuation discount to HGTY's 27.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VITL's 4.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AGRO's 72.5x.

MetricSDOT logoSDOTSadot Group Inc.AGRO logoAGROAdecoagro S.A.VITL logoVITLVital Farms, Inc.HGTY logoHGTYHagerty, Inc.FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…
Market CapShares × price$334,346$6.9B$426M$3.5B$295M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$10M$8.5B$431M$3.5B$314M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.00x-815.24x6.61x27.84x15.54x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.85x10.38x100.88x11.90x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.17x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple72.46x4.22x19.64x10.38x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.00x5.01x0.56x2.43x0.67x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.82x1.25x4.78x1.87x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF334.52x18.19x8.74x
Evenly matched — AGRO and VITL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

VITL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

VITL delivers a 14.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-10 for SDOT. VITL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AGRO's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs VITL's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSDOT logoSDOTSadot Group Inc.AGRO logoAGROAdecoagro S.A.VITL logoVITLVital Farms, Inc.HGTY logoHGTYHagerty, Inc.FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-9.7%-0.5%+14.5%+1.8%+12.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-128.7%-0.2%+10.0%+0.6%+7.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-2.1%+26.9%+17.9%+9.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.3%+26.1%+7.4%+12.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–933268
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.09x0.15x0.31x0.35x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$10M$1.6B$5M-$66M$19M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$653,000$383M$49M$299M$40M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10M$1.9B$53M$233M$59M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-10.43x0.68x39.83x92.69x380.21x
VITL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AGRO five years ago would be worth $15,007 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22 for SDOT. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +80.1% total return vs SDOT's -97.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs SDOT's -86.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSDOT logoSDOTSadot Group Inc.AGRO logoAGROAdecoagro S.A.VITL logoVITLVital Farms, Inc.HGTY logoHGTYHagerty, Inc.FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-80.6%+73.8%-68.1%-21.7%+38.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-97.4%+58.7%-73.5%+5.6%+80.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%+68.9%-38.2%+8.8%+242.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%+50.1%-54.4%+5.6%+19.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+39.9%-73.0%+5.6%+51.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-86.7%+19.1%-14.8%+2.8%+50.7%
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AGRO and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AGRO is the less volatile stock with a -0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLXS's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs SDOT's 1.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSDOT logoSDOTSadot Group Inc.AGRO logoAGROAdecoagro S.A.VITL logoVITLVital Farms, Inc.HGTY logoHGTYHagerty, Inc.FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.40x-0.08x0.31x0.53x1.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$23.00$15.89$53.13$14.00$59.95
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.24$6.89$8.40$8.81$29.38
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+1.5%+84.1%+17.9%+73.6%+92.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10022.151.738.939.660.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded11.1M1.8M3.3M172K47K
Evenly matched — AGRO and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — AGRO and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: AGRO as "Hold", VITL as "Buy", HGTY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 316.3% upside for VITL (target: $40) vs -36.4% for AGRO (target: $9). For income investors, FLXS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.14% vs HGTY's 0.16%.

MetricSDOT logoSDOTSadot Group Inc.AGRO logoAGROAdecoagro S.A.VITL logoVITLVital Farms, Inc.HGTY logoHGTYHagerty, Inc.FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.50$39.63$14.33$54.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts8155
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%+0.2%+1.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises401
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.07$0.02$0.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%0.0%0.0%+1.0%
Evenly matched — AGRO and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

VITL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLXS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Best OverallVital Farms, Inc. (VITL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SDOT vs AGRO vs VITL vs HGTY vs FLXS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SDOT or AGRO or VITL or HGTY or FLXS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Vital Farms, Inc.

(VITL) is the stronger pick with 25. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -64. 8% for Sadot Group Inc. (SDOT). Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) offers the better valuation at 6. 6x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SDOT or AGRO or VITL or HGTY or FLXS?

On trailing P/E, Vital Farms, Inc.

(VITL) is the cheapest at 6. 6x versus Hagerty, Inc. at 27. 8x. On forward P/E, Adecoagro S. A. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SDOT or AGRO or VITL or HGTY or FLXS?

Over the past 5 years, Adecoagro S.

A. (AGRO) delivered a total return of +50. 1%, compared to -99. 8% for Sadot Group Inc. (SDOT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLXS returned +51. 4% versus SDOT's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SDOT or AGRO or VITL or HGTY or FLXS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Adecoagro S.

A. (AGRO) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 08β versus Flexsteel Industries, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning FLXS is approximately -1986% more volatile than AGRO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 109% for Adecoagro S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SDOT or AGRO or VITL or HGTY or FLXS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vital Farms, Inc.

(VITL) is pulling ahead at 25. 3% versus -64. 8% for Sadot Group Inc. (SDOT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hagerty, Inc. grew EPS 270. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1423. 8% for Sadot Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VITL leads at 28. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SDOT or AGRO or VITL or HGTY or FLXS?

Vital Farms, Inc.

(VITL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 7% net margin versus -37. 8% for Sadot Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VITL leads at 11. 6% versus -16. 4% for SDOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HGTY leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SDOT or AGRO or VITL or HGTY or FLXS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Adecoagro S.

A. (AGRO) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 100. 9x for Hagerty, Inc. — 94. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VITL: 316. 3% to $39. 63.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SDOT or AGRO or VITL or HGTY or FLXS?

In this comparison, FLXS (1.

1% yield), AGRO (0. 5% yield), HGTY (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. SDOT, VITL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SDOT or AGRO or VITL or HGTY or FLXS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Adecoagro S.

A. (AGRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 08), 0. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGRO: +39. 9%, SDOT: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SDOT and AGRO and VITL and HGTY and FLXS?

These companies operate in different sectors (SDOT (Consumer Defensive) and AGRO (Consumer Defensive) and VITL (Consumer Defensive) and HGTY (Financial Services) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SDOT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VITL is a small-cap high-growth stock; HGTY is a small-cap high-growth stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock. AGRO, FLXS pay a dividend while SDOT, VITL, HGTY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SDOT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $20B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AGRO

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VITL

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HGTY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 37%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FLXS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SDOT and AGRO and VITL and HGTY and FLXS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SDOT: -99.9% · AGRO: 11.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.