Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SE vs MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs PYPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Software - Application
Specialty Retail
Financial - Credit Services
SE vs MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs PYPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Software - Application | Specialty Retail | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $53.62B | $94.80B | $15.06B | $2.92T | $40.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21.04B | $28.89B | $3.55B | $742.78B | $33.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.43B | $2.00B | $379M | $90.80B | $5.06B |
| Gross Margin | 44.9% | 44.5% | 43.5% | 50.6% | 46.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 11.1% | 5.7% | 11.5% | 18.3% |
| Forward P/E | 25.1x | 39.2x | 34.6x | 34.8x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $4.12B | $11.39B | $2.05B | $152.99B | $9.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.41B | $3.67B | $3.43B | $86.81B | $8.05B |
SE vs MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs PYPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sea Limited (SE) | 100 | 44.5 | -55.5% |
| MercadoLibre, Inc. (MELI) | 100 | 111.6 | +11.6% |
| Grab Holdings Limit… (GRAB) | 100 | 29.5 | -70.5% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 166.5 | +66.5% |
| PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL) | 100 | 19.7 | -80.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SE vs MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs PYPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MELI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 39.1%, EPS growth 4.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.9%
- 13.7% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- 39.1% revenue growth vs PYPL's 4.3%
- Beta 1.20 vs AMZN's 1.51
GRAB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.42, Low D/E 30.4%, current ratio 1.75x
- Beta 1.42, current ratio 1.75x
AMZN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum and efficiency.
- +43.7% vs SE's -37.8%
- 11.5% ROA vs GRAB's 3.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs 3.3%
PYPL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.39, yield 0.3%
- PEG 0.98 vs AMZN's 1.24
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 34.8x), PEG 0.98 vs 1.24
- 15.8% margin vs SE's 6.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.1% revenue growth vs PYPL's 4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 34.8x), PEG 0.98 vs 1.24 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.8% margin vs SE's 6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs SE's -37.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs GRAB's 3.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs 3.3% |
SE vs MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs PYPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SE vs MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs PYPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PYPL leads in 2 of 6 categories
AMZN leads 1 • SE leads 0 • MELI leads 0 • GRAB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MELI and PYPL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 209.1x GRAB's $3.6B. PYPL is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SE's 6.8%. On growth, MELI holds the edge at +44.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21.0B | $28.9B | $3.6B | $742.8B | $33.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | $4.0B | $395M | $155.9B | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.4B | $2.0B | $379M | $90.8B | $5.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.9B | $10.1B | -$88M | -$2.5B | $5.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.9% | +44.5% | +43.5% | +50.6% | +46.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +11.1% | +5.7% | +11.5% | +18.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +6.9% | +10.7% | +12.2% | +15.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | +35.0% | -2.5% | -0.3% | +16.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.3% | +44.6% | +23.5% | +16.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +126.9% | -12.5% | +2.1% | +74.8% | -6.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PYPL leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, PYPL trades at a 93% valuation discount to SE's 121.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PYPL offers better value at 0.97x vs AMZN's 1.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $53.6B | $94.8B | $15.1B | $2.92T | $40.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $55.3B | $102.5B | $13.7B | $2.98T | $42.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 121.47x | 47.47x | 59.50x | 37.82x | 8.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.06x | 39.21x | 34.64x | 34.77x | 8.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.35x | 0.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 52.61x | 27.18x | 36.09x | 20.47x | 6.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.19x | 3.28x | 4.47x | 4.07x | 1.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.32x | 14.05x | 2.36x | 7.14x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.14x | 8.80x | 112.36x | 378.98x | 7.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MELI and GRAB each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MELI delivers a 33.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $6 for GRAB. GRAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MELI's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PYPL scores 8/9 vs GRAB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.2% | +33.7% | +5.8% | +23.3% | +25.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.8% | +5.7% | +3.3% | +11.5% | +6.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +20.8% | +3.3% | +14.7% | +15.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +28.3% | +2.9% | +15.3% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | 1.69x | 0.30x | 0.37x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $7.7B | -$1.4B | $66.2B | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.4B | $3.7B | $3.4B | $86.8B | $8.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.1B | $11.4B | $2.1B | $153.0B | $10.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 49.70x | 17.53x | 2.96x | 39.96x | 19.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,835 for PYPL. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs SE's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs PYPL's -14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.6% | -5.3% | -25.4% | +19.7% | -20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -37.8% | -17.3% | -21.7% | +43.7% | -32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.1% | +45.6% | +13.5% | +156.2% | -38.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.1% | +26.2% | -67.5% | +64.8% | -81.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +455.5% | +1370.4% | -68.1% | +697.8% | +17.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.7% | +13.3% | +4.3% | +36.8% | -14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MELI and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MELI is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs SE's 44.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.20x | 1.42x | 1.51x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $199.30 | $2645.22 | $6.62 | $278.56 | $79.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $77.05 | $1593.21 | $3.48 | $185.01 | $38.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.5% | +70.7% | +57.3% | +97.3% | +58.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.1 | 54.8 | 46.6 | 81.1 | 40.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.8M | 472K | 48.1M | 45.5M | 15.4M |
Analyst Outlook
PYPL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SE as "Buy", MELI as "Buy", GRAB as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", PYPL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 76.8% upside for GRAB (target: $7) vs 11.8% for PYPL (target: $52). PYPL is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $147.67 | $2420.00 | $6.70 | $306.77 | $51.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 33 | 12 | 94 | 70 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +14.8% |
PYPL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). AMZN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
SE vs MELI vs GRAB vs AMZN vs PYPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SE or MELI or GRAB or AMZN or PYPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is the stronger pick with 39. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sea Limited (SE) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SE or MELI or GRAB or AMZN or PYPL?
On trailing P/E, PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Sea Limited at 121. 5x. On forward P/E, PayPal Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PayPal Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 98x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SE or MELI or GRAB or AMZN or PYPL?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -81. 6% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MELI returned +1370% versus GRAB's -68. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SE or MELI or GRAB or AMZN or PYPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 26% more volatile than MELI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 169% for MercadoLibre, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SE or MELI or GRAB or AMZN or PYPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is pulling ahead at 39. 1% versus 4. 3% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Grab Holdings Limited grew EPS 342. 2% year-over-year, compared to 4. 5% for MercadoLibre, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MELI leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SE or MELI or GRAB or AMZN or PYPL?
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 8% net margin versus 2. 6% for Sea Limited — meaning it keeps 15. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PYPL leads at 18. 3% versus 3. 9% for SE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SE or MELI or GRAB or AMZN or PYPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 24x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 39. 2x for MercadoLibre, Inc. — 30. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GRAB: 76. 8% to $6. 70.
08Which pays a better dividend — SE or MELI or GRAB or AMZN or PYPL?
In this comparison, PYPL (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. SE, MELI, GRAB, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SE or MELI or GRAB or AMZN or PYPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MercadoLibre, Inc.
(MELI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), +1370% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MELI: +1370%, GRAB: -68. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SE and MELI and GRAB and AMZN and PYPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (SE (Consumer Cyclical) and MELI (Consumer Cyclical) and GRAB (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and PYPL (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MELI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GRAB is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; PYPL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.