Solar
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SEDG vs XOM vs NEE vs CVX vs FSLR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
Regulated Electric
Oil & Gas Integrated
Solar
SEDG vs XOM vs NEE vs CVX vs FSLR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Oil & Gas Integrated | Regulated Electric | Oil & Gas Integrated | Solar |
| Market Cap | $2.35B | $620.85B | $194.60B | $364.18B | $23.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.28B | $323.90B | $27.93B | $184.43B | $5.42B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-364M | $28.84B | $8.18B | $12.30B | $1.67B |
| Gross Margin | 18.2% | 21.7% | 47.8% | 30.4% | 41.7% |
| Operating Margin | -18.6% | 10.5% | 29.5% | 9.0% | 33.0% |
| Forward P/E | 610.9x | 14.8x | 23.1x | 15.0x | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $423M | $43.54B | $95.62B | $46.74B | $499M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $540M | $10.68B | $2.81B | $6.47B | $2.80B |
SEDG vs XOM vs NEE vs CVX vs FSLR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SolarEdge Technolog… (SEDG) | 100 | 27.2 | -72.8% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 322.2 | +222.2% |
| NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) | 100 | 146.1 | +46.1% |
| Chevron Corporation (CVX) | 100 | 199.0 | +99.0% |
| First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) | 100 | 460.3 | +360.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEDG vs XOM vs NEE vs CVX vs FSLR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEDG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 31.4%, EPS growth 78.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -27.5%
- 31.4% revenue growth vs CVX's -4.6%
- +161.4% vs CVX's +39.5%
XOM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NEE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 2.4%
- Beta 0.21 vs SEDG's 2.03
- 2.4% yield, 30-year raise streak, vs CVX's 3.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, CVX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 324.1% 10Y total return vs NEE's 266.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
- PEG 0.39 vs NEE's 1.33
- Beta 1.39, current ratio 2.67x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.4% revenue growth vs CVX's -4.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 15.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs SEDG's -28.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs SEDG's 2.03 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 30-year raise streak, vs CVX's 3.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +161.4% vs CVX's +39.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs SEDG's -15.9%, ROIC 17.6% vs -29.5% |
SEDG vs XOM vs NEE vs CVX vs FSLR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SEDG vs XOM vs NEE vs CVX vs FSLR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FSLR leads in 3 of 6 categories
SEDG leads 0 • XOM leads 0 • NEE leads 0 • CVX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 254.0x SEDG's $1.3B. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEDG's -28.6%. On growth, SEDG holds the edge at +41.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $323.9B | $27.9B | $184.4B | $5.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$225M | $59.9B | $15.5B | $37.1B | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$364M | $28.8B | $8.2B | $12.3B | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $78M | $23.6B | -$3.8B | $16.2B | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.2% | +21.7% | +47.8% | +30.4% | +41.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -18.6% | +10.5% | +29.5% | +9.0% | +33.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -28.6% | +8.9% | +29.3% | +6.7% | +30.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +7.3% | -13.6% | +8.8% | +30.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +41.5% | -1.3% | +7.3% | -5.3% | +23.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | -11.0% | +160.0% | -24.5% | +65.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, FSLR trades at a 47% valuation discount to NEE's 28.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FSLR offers better value at 0.49x vs NEE's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $620.8B | $194.6B | $364.2B | $23.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $653.7B | $287.4B | $404.5B | $20.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.60x | 21.86x | 28.36x | 27.53x | 15.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 610.92x | 14.79x | 23.07x | 15.02x | 12.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.64x | — | 0.49x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.91x | 18.73x | 10.89x | 9.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.98x | 1.92x | 7.08x | 1.97x | 4.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.40x | 2.37x | 2.93x | 1.76x | 2.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.06x | 26.29x | — | 21.95x | 19.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-80 for SEDG. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NEE's 1.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEDG scores 7/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -79.6% | +10.7% | +12.7% | +7.2% | +18.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.9% | +6.4% | +3.9% | +4.2% | +12.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -29.5% | +8.6% | +4.1% | +6.2% | +17.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.2% | +8.9% | +4.7% | +6.6% | +15.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | 0.16x | 1.44x | 0.24x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$116M | $32.9B | $92.8B | $40.3B | -$2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $540M | $10.7B | $2.8B | $6.5B | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $423M | $43.5B | $95.6B | $46.7B | $499M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.80x | 69.44x | 1.99x | 17.22x | 53.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SEDG and XOM and FSLR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $28,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,752 for SEDG. Over the past 12 months, SEDG leads with a +161.4% total return vs CVX's +39.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XOM at 13.2% vs SEDG's -49.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.1% | +20.3% | +16.1% | +18.2% | -21.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +161.4% | +43.9% | +42.0% | +39.5% | +65.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.8% | +44.9% | +31.0% | +26.7% | +20.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.5% | +164.6% | +38.2% | +94.0% | +187.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.9% | +105.0% | +266.0% | +135.8% | +324.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -49.0% | +13.2% | +9.4% | +8.2% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XOM and NEE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SEDG's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEE currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs SEDG's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | -0.15x | 0.21x | -0.05x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.75 | $176.41 | $98.75 | $214.71 | $285.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.73 | $101.19 | $63.88 | $133.77 | $125.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.8% | +83.0% | +94.5% | +85.0% | +75.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.7 | 42.4 | 54.3 | 42.1 | 64.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.6M | 18.9M | 8.7M | 11.0M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NEE and CVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SEDG as "Hold", XOM as "Hold", NEE as "Buy", CVX as "Buy", FSLR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.1% upside for FSLR (target: $264) vs -9.1% for SEDG (target: $35). For income investors, CVX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.76% vs NEE's 2.40%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.09 | $160.43 | $98.13 | $190.93 | $264.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 55 | 36 | 53 | 73 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% | +2.4% | +3.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 26 | 30 | 8 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.00 | $2.24 | $6.87 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% | 0.0% | +3.3% | +0.1% |
FSLR leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 3 categories are tied.
SEDG vs XOM vs NEE vs CVX vs FSLR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEDG or XOM or NEE or CVX or FSLR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
(SEDG) is the stronger pick with 31. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 6% for Chevron Corporation (CVX). First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SEDG or XOM or NEE or CVX or FSLR?
On trailing P/E, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus NextEra Energy, Inc. at 28. 4x. On forward P/E, First Solar, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Solar, Inc. wins at 0. 39x versus NextEra Energy, Inc. 's 1. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SEDG or XOM or NEE or CVX or FSLR?
Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) delivered a total return of +187. 6%, compared to -82. 5% for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSLR returned +324. 1% versus SEDG's +70. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SEDG or XOM or NEE or CVX or FSLR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning SEDG is approximately -1492% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 144% for NextEra Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SEDG or XOM or NEE or CVX or FSLR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
(SEDG) is pulling ahead at 31. 4% versus -4. 6% for Chevron Corporation (CVX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 78. 2% year-over-year, compared to -31. 8% for Chevron Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSLR leads at 25. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SEDG or XOM or NEE or CVX or FSLR?
First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -34. 2% for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -24. 1% for SEDG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEE leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SEDG or XOM or NEE or CVX or FSLR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 39x versus NextEra Energy, Inc. 's 1. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 610. 9x for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. — 598. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FSLR: 23. 1% to $264. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — SEDG or XOM or NEE or CVX or FSLR?
In this comparison, CVX (3.
8% yield), XOM (2. 7% yield), NEE (2. 4% yield) pay a dividend. SEDG, FSLR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SEDG or XOM or NEE or CVX or FSLR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +105. 0% 10Y return). SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +105. 0%, SEDG: +70. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SEDG and XOM and NEE and CVX and FSLR?
These companies operate in different sectors (SEDG (Energy) and XOM (Energy) and NEE (Utilities) and CVX (Energy) and FSLR (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SEDG is a small-cap high-growth stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; NEE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CVX is a large-cap income-oriented stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. XOM, NEE, CVX pay a dividend while SEDG, FSLR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.