Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SEER vs NAUT vs CDNA vs ILMN vs PACB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SEER
Seer, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$105M
5Y Perf.-96.7%
NAUT
Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$366M
5Y Perf.-73.5%
CDNA
CareDx, Inc

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.11B
5Y Perf.-70.4%
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$21.07B
5Y Perf.-61.4%
PACB
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$498M
5Y Perf.-93.6%

SEER vs NAUT vs CDNA vs ILMN vs PACB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SEER logoSEER
NAUT logoNAUT
CDNA logoCDNA
ILMN logoILMN
PACB logoPACB
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Devices
Market Cap$105M$366M$1.11B$21.07B$498M
Revenue (TTM)$16M$0.00$413M$4.39B$160M
Net Income (TTM)$-79M$-57M$-8M$853M$-546M
Gross Margin40.7%48.2%67.1%28.2%
Operating Margin-5.2%-3.3%20.9%-346.1%
Forward P/E22.8x26.8x
Total Debt$26M$30M$20M$2.55B$759M
Cash & Equiv.$41M$12M$65M$1.42B$64M

SEER vs NAUT vs CDNA vs ILMN vs PACBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SEER
NAUT
CDNA
ILMN
PACB
StockDec 20May 26Return
Seer, Inc. (SEER)1003.3-96.7%
Nautilus Biotechnol… (NAUT)10026.5-73.5%
CareDx, Inc (CDNA)10029.6-70.4%
Illumina, Inc. (ILMN)10038.6-61.4%
Pacific Biosciences… (PACB)1006.4-93.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SEER vs NAUT vs CDNA vs ILMN vs PACB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CDNA and ILMN are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Illumina, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. SEER and NAUT also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SEER
Seer, Inc.
The Income Pick

SEER ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.84
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 7.9%, current ratio 16.53x
  • Beta 0.84, current ratio 16.53x
  • Beta 0.84 vs PACB's 2.43, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
NAUT
Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

NAUT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +311.5% vs SEER's +1.6%
Best for: momentum
CDNA
CareDx, Inc
The Growth Play

CDNA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth -143.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.7%
  • 13.8% revenue growth vs SEER's -8.1%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ILMN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 0.7% 10Y total return vs CDNA's 385.1%
  • 19.4% margin vs SEER's -486.0%
  • 13.4% ROA vs PACB's -66.8%, ROIC 16.8% vs -45.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
PACB
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PACB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCDNA logoCDNA13.8% revenue growth vs SEER's -8.1%
ValueCDNA logoCDNABetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsILMN logoILMN19.4% margin vs SEER's -486.0%
Stability / SafetySEER logoSEERBeta 0.84 vs PACB's 2.43, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NAUT logoNAUT+311.5% vs SEER's +1.6%
Efficiency (ROA)ILMN logoILMN13.4% ROA vs PACB's -66.8%, ROIC 16.8% vs -45.8%

SEER vs NAUT vs CDNA vs ILMN vs PACB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SEERSeer, Inc.
FY 2023
Grant
100.0%$1M
NAUTNautilus Biotechnology, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CDNACareDx, Inc
FY 2025
Service
85.0%$274M
Product
15.0%$48M
ILMNIllumina, Inc.
FY 2025
Sequencing
91.8%$4.0B
Microarray
8.2%$358M
PACBPacific Biosciences of California, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
45.9%$136M
Consumable
27.7%$82M
Instrument
18.2%$54M
Service And Other
8.2%$24M

SEER vs NAUT vs CDNA vs ILMN vs PACB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCDNALAGGINGPACB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ILMN and NAUT operate at a comparable scale, with $4.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEER's -4.9%. On growth, CDNA holds the edge at +39.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSEER logoSEERSeer, Inc.NAUT logoNAUTNautilus Biotechn…CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$16M$0$413M$4.4B$160M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$76M-$58M$2M$1.1B-$169M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$79M-$57M-$8M$853M-$546M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$46M-$51M$65M$989M-$124M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+40.7%+48.2%+67.1%+28.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-5.2%-3.3%+20.9%-3.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.9%-2.0%+19.4%-3.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.8%+15.8%+22.5%-77.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.5%+39.0%+4.8%+13.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.6%+7.7%+126.3%+6.1%
ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CDNA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricSEER logoSEERSeer, Inc.NAUT logoNAUTNautilus Biotechn…CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…
Market CapShares × price$105M$366M$1.1B$21.1B$498M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$90M$384M$1.1B$22.2B$1.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.35x-6.13x-53.60x25.45x-0.91x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.85x26.77x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate6.01x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.58x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.52x2.92x4.86x3.11x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.36x2.32x3.77x7.95x92.53x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF30.66x22.63x
CDNA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-11 for PACB. CDNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PACB's 141.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs NAUT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSEER logoSEERSeer, Inc.NAUT logoNAUTNautilus Biotechn…CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-29.2%-35.0%-2.6%+32.8%-11.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-25.7%-29.2%-1.9%+13.4%-66.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-21.3%-26.0%-5.7%+16.8%-45.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-25.9%-32.0%-5.8%+17.6%-58.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–941583
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.08x0.19x0.06x0.94x141.98x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$15M$18M-$46M$1.1B$696M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$41M$12M$65M$1.4B$64M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$26M$30M$20M$2.6B$759M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense12.09x-77.95x
ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CDNA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ILMN five years ago would be worth $3,717 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $494 for SEER. Over the past 12 months, NAUT leads with a +311.5% total return vs SEER's +1.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDNA at 37.7% vs PACB's -48.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSEER logoSEERSeer, Inc.NAUT logoNAUTNautilus Biotechn…CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+3.3%+50.8%+12.0%+3.2%-10.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+1.6%+311.5%+45.2%+81.7%+46.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-47.2%+21.0%+161.1%-27.1%-86.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.1%-71.3%-72.4%-62.8%-93.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.7%-72.4%+385.1%+0.7%-81.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-19.2%+6.6%+37.7%-10.0%-48.7%
CDNA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SEER and CDNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SEER is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PACB's 2.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDNA currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs PACB's 60.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSEER logoSEERSeer, Inc.NAUT logoNAUTNautilus Biotechn…CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.84x1.82x1.39x1.23x2.43x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.41$4.31$23.24$155.53$2.73
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.65$0.62$10.96$73.86$0.85
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.0%+66.8%+92.3%+89.2%+60.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.852.556.465.260.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded401K315K667K1.5M5.9M
Evenly matched — SEER and CDNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: SEER as "Hold", NAUT as "Buy", CDNA as "Buy", ILMN as "Buy", PACB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 11.9% upside for CDNA (target: $24) vs -39.4% for PACB (target: $1).

MetricSEER logoSEERSeer, Inc.NAUT logoNAUTNautilus Biotechn…CDNA logoCDNACareDx, IncILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.PACB logoPACBPacific Bioscienc…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.50$24.00$147.38$1.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts45135018
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+11.3%0.0%+7.9%+3.5%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ILMN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CDNA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallCareDx, Inc (CDNA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SEER vs NAUT vs CDNA vs ILMN vs PACB: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SEER or NAUT or CDNA or ILMN or PACB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, CareDx, Inc (CDNA) is the stronger pick with 13.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 1% for Seer, Inc. (SEER). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc. (NAUT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SEER or NAUT or CDNA or ILMN or PACB?

On forward P/E, CareDx, Inc is actually cheaper at 22.

8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SEER or NAUT or CDNA or ILMN or PACB?

Over the past 5 years, Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) delivered a total return of -62. 8%, compared to -95. 1% for Seer, Inc. (SEER). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CDNA returned +385. 1% versus SEER's -96. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SEER or NAUT or CDNA or ILMN or PACB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seer, Inc.

(SEER) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. 's 2. 43β — meaning PACB is approximately 189% more volatile than SEER relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CareDx, Inc (CDNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 142% for Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SEER or NAUT or CDNA or ILMN or PACB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CareDx, Inc (CDNA) is pulling ahead at 13.

8% versus -8. 1% for Seer, Inc. (SEER). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to -143. 0% for CareDx, Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, SEER leads at 29. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SEER or NAUT or CDNA or ILMN or PACB?

Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -620. 9% for Seer, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -717. 7% for SEER. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDNA leads at 67. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SEER or NAUT or CDNA or ILMN or PACB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, CareDx, Inc (CDNA) trades at 22.

8x forward P/E versus 26. 8x for Illumina, Inc. — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDNA: 11. 9% to $24. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SEER or NAUT or CDNA or ILMN or PACB?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is SEER or NAUT or CDNA or ILMN or PACB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Seer, Inc.

(SEER) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84)). Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (PACB) carries a higher beta of 2. 43 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEER: -96. 7%, PACB: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SEER and NAUT and CDNA and ILMN and PACB?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SEER

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NAUT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CDNA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ILMN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PACB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 16%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.