Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SEG vs FUN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
SEG vs FUN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $287M | $1.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $130M | $3.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-117M | $-1.75B |
| Gross Margin | -23.1% | 73.8% |
| Operating Margin | -55.9% | -41.4% |
| Total Debt | $156M | $5.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $78M | $83M |
SEG vs FUN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seaport Entertainme… (SEG) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
| Six Flags Entertain… (FUN) | 100 | 38.1 | -61.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEG vs FUN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.24
- -25.0% 10Y total return vs FUN's -41.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 33.5%, current ratio 1.50x
FUN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 50.6%, EPS growth -195.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.5%
- 50.6% revenue growth vs SEG's 17.3%
- -55.7% margin vs SEG's -89.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 50.6% revenue growth vs SEG's 17.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -55.7% margin vs SEG's -89.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.24 vs FUN's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.3% vs FUN's -49.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -16.8% ROA vs FUN's -22.1%, ROIC -9.9% vs 5.1% |
SEG vs FUN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SEG vs FUN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 24.1x SEG's $130M. FUN is the more profitable business, keeping -55.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SEG's -89.5%. On growth, SEG holds the edge at +29.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $130M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$41M | -$828M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$117M | -$1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$71M | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -23.1% | +73.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -55.9% | -41.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -89.5% | -55.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -54.3% | -5.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.1% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.1% | -11.7% |
Valuation Metrics
FUN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $287M | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $365M | $6.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.44x | -7.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.20x | 0.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.61x | 0.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 34.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SEG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEG delivers a -23.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-23 in annual profit, vs $-2 for FUN. SEG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUN's 2.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUN scores 4/9 vs SEG's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.0% | -2.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.8% | -22.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.9% | +5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.1% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.33x | 2.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | $5.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $78M | $83M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $156M | $5.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -159.93x | -3.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SEG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SEG five years ago would be worth $7,503 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,223 for FUN. Over the past 12 months, SEG leads with a +14.3% total return vs FUN's -49.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SEG at -9.1% vs FUN's -21.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.1% | +17.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.3% | -49.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.0% | -51.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.0% | -57.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.0% | -41.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.1% | -21.6% |
Risk & Volatility
SEG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEG is the less volatile stock with a 1.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUN's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEG currently trades 79.2% from its 52-week high vs FUN's 47.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 1.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.34 | $38.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.28 | $12.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.2% | +47.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.2 | 44.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SEG as "Buy" and FUN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.2% upside for FUN (target: $23) vs 22.5% for SEG (target: $28). FUN is the only dividend payer here at 1.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.50 | $22.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SEG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FUN leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics).
SEG vs FUN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEG or FUN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is the stronger pick with 50.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 17. 3% for Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. (SEG). Analysts rate Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. (SEG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SEG or FUN?
Over the past 5 years, Seaport Entertainment Group Inc.
(SEG) delivered a total return of -25. 0%, compared to -57. 8% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SEG returned -25. 0% versus FUN's -41. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SEG or FUN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seaport Entertainment Group Inc.
(SEG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 24β versus Six Flags Entertainment Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning FUN is approximately 47% more volatile than SEG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. (SEG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 2% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SEG or FUN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is pulling ahead at 50.
6% versus 17. 3% for Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. (SEG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. grew EPS 45. 4% year-over-year, compared to -195. 0% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUN leads at 26. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SEG or FUN?
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is the more profitable company, earning -8.
5% net margin versus -89. 5% for Seaport Entertainment Group Inc. — meaning it keeps -8. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUN leads at 11. 5% versus -55. 9% for SEG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUN leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SEG or FUN?
In this comparison, FUN (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. SEG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is SEG or FUN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Seaport Entertainment Group Inc.
(SEG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 24)). Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEG: -25. 0%, FUN: -41. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SEG and FUN?
These companies operate in different sectors (SEG (Real Estate) and FUN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
FUN pays a dividend while SEG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.