Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SELX vs AAOI vs LITE vs COHU vs LSCC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Communication Equipment
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
SELX vs AAOI vs LITE vs COHU vs LSCC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $3M | $12.44B | $63.74B | $2.23B | $16.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $48M | $507M | $2.49B | $481M | $574M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-79M | $-43M | $440M | $-56M | $20M |
| Gross Margin | -36.1% | 29.6% | 37.7% | 25.7% | 66.9% |
| Operating Margin | -191.7% | -11.6% | 9.5% | -10.6% | 5.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 167.2x | 114.4x | 89.2x | 114.2x |
| Total Debt | $148M | $167M | $2.61B | $359M | $78M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $202M | $216M | $521M | $227M | $134M |
SELX vs AAOI vs LITE vs COHU vs LSCC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semilux Internation… (SELX) | 100 | 45.6 | -54.4% |
| Applied Optoelectro… (AAOI) | 100 | 985.9 | +885.9% |
| Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE) | 100 | 1841.9 | +1741.9% |
| Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | 100 | 147.8 | +47.8% |
| Lattice Semiconduct… (LSCC) | 100 | 156.5 | +56.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SELX vs AAOI vs LITE vs COHU vs LSCC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SELX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.30 vs AAOI's 4.13
AAOI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 82.8%, EPS growth 85.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- 82.8% revenue growth vs SELX's -67.9%
LITE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.69
- 36.4% 10Y total return vs AAOI's 14.4%
- 17.7% margin vs SELX's -165.2%
- +12.5% vs SELX's -76.6%
COHU is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.13, Low D/E 45.8%, current ratio 6.88x
- Beta 2.13, current ratio 6.88x
- Lower P/E (89.2x vs 114.4x)
Among these 5 stocks, LSCC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 82.8% revenue growth vs SELX's -67.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (89.2x vs 114.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.7% margin vs SELX's -165.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs AAOI's 4.13 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.5% vs SELX's -76.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs SELX's -19.0%, ROIC -4.3% vs -24.6% |
SELX vs AAOI vs LITE vs COHU vs LSCC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SELX vs AAOI vs LITE vs COHU vs LSCC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LSCC leads in 1 of 6 categories
AAOI leads 1 • SELX leads 0 • LITE leads 0 • COHU leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LITE and LSCC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LITE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 51.8x SELX's $48M. LITE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SELX's -165.2%. On growth, LITE holds the edge at +90.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $48M | $507M | $2.5B | $481M | $574M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$68M | -$37M | $425M | -$11M | $63M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$79M | -$43M | $440M | -$56M | $20M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$82M | -$239M | $399M | $32M | $152M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -36.1% | +29.6% | +37.7% | +25.7% | +66.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -191.7% | -11.6% | +9.5% | -10.6% | +5.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -165.2% | -8.5% | +17.7% | -11.5% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -170.5% | -47.1% | +16.0% | +6.6% | +26.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +51.4% | +90.1% | +29.3% | +42.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -5.6% | +3.3% | +60.6% | +3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SELX and LSCC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2412.9x trailing earnings, LITE trades at a 55% valuation discount to LSCC's 5377.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LSCC's 284.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LITE's 859.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $12.4B | $63.7B | $2.2B | $16.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $12.4B | $65.8B | $2.4B | $16.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.81x | -246.17x | 2412.94x | -29.86x | 5377.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 167.16x | 114.43x | 89.21x | 114.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 859.43x | — | 284.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.76x | 27.29x | 38.75x | 4.93x | 31.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.32x | 12.92x | 54.76x | 2.82x | 23.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 207.83x | 123.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LSCC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-31 for SELX. LSCC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LITE scores 7/9 vs SELX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -31.4% | -6.1% | +30.7% | -6.8% | +2.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.0% | -3.8% | +8.5% | -4.9% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -24.6% | -7.9% | -4.3% | -5.7% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -20.8% | -8.5% | -4.8% | -5.9% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 0.23x | 2.30x | 0.46x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$54M | -$49M | $2.1B | $132M | -$56M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $202M | $216M | $521M | $227M | $134M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $148M | $167M | $2.6B | $359M | $78M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -84.30x | -28.36x | 9.62x | -168.82x | 6.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AAOI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAOI five years ago would be worth $207,850 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $558 for SELX. Over the past 12 months, LITE leads with a +1247.8% total return vs SELX's -76.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAOI at 3.5% vs SELX's -61.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.5% | +297.9% | +131.2% | +92.9% | +52.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -76.6% | +1027.0% | +1247.8% | +199.7% | +146.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.4% | +8801.1% | +1764.2% | +40.7% | +41.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.4% | +1978.5% | +976.6% | +22.2% | +137.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.4% | +1435.6% | +3635.5% | +330.2% | +2210.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -61.8% | +3.5% | +165.2% | +12.1% | +12.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SELX and LSCC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SELX is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAOI's 4.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LSCC currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs SELX's 19.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 4.13x | 2.69x | 2.13x | 2.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.85 | $191.87 | $1021.00 | $50.68 | $127.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.23 | $12.56 | $60.38 | $15.34 | $43.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.7% | +82.1% | +87.4% | +93.7% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.5 | 62.9 | 58.8 | 75.5 | 64.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 12.4M | 6.4M | 953K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AAOI as "Buy", LITE as "Buy", COHU as "Buy", LSCC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.8% upside for COHU (target: $50) vs -70.8% for AAOI (target: $46).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | $643.18 | $49.75 | $106.70 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 24 | 14 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.3% | +0.6% |
LSCC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). AAOI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
SELX vs AAOI vs LITE vs COHU vs LSCC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SELX or AAOI or LITE or COHU or LSCC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) is the stronger pick with 82. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -67. 9% for Semilux International Ltd. Ordinary Shares (SELX). Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) offers the better valuation at 2412. 9x trailing P/E (114. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (AAOI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SELX or AAOI or LITE or COHU or LSCC?
On trailing P/E, Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) is the cheapest at 2412. 9x versus Lattice Semiconductor Corporation at 5377. 6x. On forward P/E, Cohu, Inc. is actually cheaper at 89. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SELX or AAOI or LITE or COHU or LSCC?
Over the past 5 years, Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) delivered a total return of +1978%, compared to -94. 4% for Semilux International Ltd. Ordinary Shares (SELX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 4% versus SELX's -94. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SELX or AAOI or LITE or COHU or LSCC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Semilux International Ltd.
Ordinary Shares (SELX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. 's 4. 13β — meaning AAOI is approximately 1296% more volatile than SELX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SELX or AAOI or LITE or COHU or LSCC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
(AAOI) is pulling ahead at 82. 8% versus -67. 9% for Semilux International Ltd. Ordinary Shares (SELX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lumentum Holdings Inc. grew EPS 104. 6% year-over-year, compared to -436. 9% for Semilux International Ltd. Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, AAOI leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SELX or AAOI or LITE or COHU or LSCC?
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 6% net margin versus -152. 3% for Semilux International Ltd. Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 1. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LSCC leads at 2. 9% versus -228. 8% for SELX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LSCC leads at 68. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SELX or AAOI or LITE or COHU or LSCC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cohu, Inc.
(COHU) trades at 89. 2x forward P/E versus 167. 2x for Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. — 77. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COHU: 4. 8% to $49. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SELX or AAOI or LITE or COHU or LSCC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SELX or AAOI or LITE or COHU or LSCC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Semilux International Ltd.
Ordinary Shares (SELX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30)). Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SELX: -94. 4%, LSCC: +22. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SELX and AAOI and LITE and COHU and LSCC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SELX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AAOI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LSCC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.