Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SEPN vs RXRX vs IMVT vs KYMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
SEPN vs RXRX vs IMVT vs KYMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.07B | $1.48B | $5.88B | $7.03B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $66M | $0.00 | $51M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-49M | $-560M | $-464M | $-315M |
| Gross Margin | — | -34.4% | — | 33.2% |
| Operating Margin | -148.6% | -8.8% | — | -7.0% |
| Total Debt | $24M | $78M | $98K | $82M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $121M | $743M | $714M | $357M |
SEPN vs RXRX vs IMVT vs KYMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Septerna, Inc. (SEPN) | 100 | 104.3 | +4.3% |
| Recursion Pharmaceu… (RXRX) | 100 | 52.5 | -47.5% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 98.9 | -1.1% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 186.4 | +86.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEPN vs RXRX vs IMVT vs KYMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEPN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 41.7%, EPS growth 84.8%
- 41.7% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
- +243.5% vs RXRX's -24.4%
- -9.5% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1%
RXRX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IMVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 190.9% 10Y total return vs KYMR's 158.8%
- 3.2% margin vs RXRX's -8.4%
KYMR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.03
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 10.47x
- Beta 1.03 vs RXRX's 2.99, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 41.7% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs RXRX's -8.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs RXRX's 2.99, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +243.5% vs RXRX's -24.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -9.5% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1% |
SEPN vs RXRX vs IMVT vs KYMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SEPN vs RXRX vs IMVT vs KYMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SEPN leads in 2 of 6 categories
RXRX leads 1 • KYMR leads 1 • IMVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEPN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RXRX and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $66M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -106.4% (SEPN) to -8.4% (RXRX). On growth, SEPN holds the edge at +112.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $66M | $0 | $51M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$68M | -$501M | -$487M | -$352M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$49M | -$560M | -$464M | -$315M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $110M | -$326M | -$423M | -$244M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | -34.4% | — | +33.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -148.6% | -8.8% | — | -7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -106.4% | -8.4% | — | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | -4.9% | — | -4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +112.8% | -56.1% | — | +55.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +64.1% | +56.0% | +19.7% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
RXRX leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $1.5B | $5.9B | $7.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $972M | $819M | $5.2B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -21.70x | -2.31x | -10.60x | -23.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 23.28x | 19.88x | — | 179.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.77x | 1.31x | 6.20x | 4.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.75x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SEPN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEPN delivers a -12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-13 in annual profit, vs $-54 for RXRX. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RXRX's 0.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEPN scores 5/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.6% | -54.3% | -47.1% | -25.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.5% | -40.6% | -44.1% | -22.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -20.8% | -95.8% | — | -24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.3% | -50.1% | -66.1% | -27.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.07x | 0.00x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$97M | -$665M | -$714M | -$275M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $121M | $743M | $714M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $78M | $98,000 | $82M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -342.92x | — | -2119.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KYMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KYMR five years ago would be worth $19,577 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,441 for RXRX. Over the past 12 months, SEPN leads with a +243.5% total return vs RXRX's -24.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 45.9% vs RXRX's -16.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.7% | -21.0% | +11.7% | +18.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +243.5% | -24.4% | +102.4% | +179.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.5% | -40.7% | +49.8% | +210.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.5% | -85.6% | +84.4% | +95.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.5% | -81.6% | +190.9% | +158.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.7% | -16.0% | +14.4% | +45.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMVT and KYMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KYMR is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RXRX's 2.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs RXRX's 46.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 2.99x | 1.36x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.63 | $7.18 | $30.09 | $103.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.44 | $2.80 | $13.36 | $28.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.2% | +46.2% | +96.2% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.9 | 44.4 | 50.6 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 302K | 12.5M | 1.4M | 583K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SEPN as "Buy", RXRX as "Hold", IMVT as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 231.3% upside for RXRX (target: $11) vs 37.2% for KYMR (target: $118).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $39.00 | $11.00 | $45.50 | $118.06 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 10 | 23 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SEPN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RXRX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SEPN vs RXRX vs IMVT vs KYMR: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEPN or RXRX or IMVT or KYMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Septerna, Inc.
(SEPN) is the stronger pick with 41. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). Analysts rate Septerna, Inc. (SEPN) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SEPN or RXRX or IMVT or KYMR?
Over the past 5 years, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) delivered a total return of +95. 8%, compared to -85. 6% for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +190. 9% versus RXRX's -81. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SEPN or RXRX or IMVT or KYMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 99β — meaning RXRX is approximately 191% more volatile than KYMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 7% for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SEPN or RXRX or IMVT or KYMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Septerna, Inc.
(SEPN) is pulling ahead at 41. 7% versus -16. 7% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. (KYMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Septerna, Inc. grew EPS 84. 8% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RXRX leads at 23. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SEPN or RXRX or IMVT or KYMR?
Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -863. 4% for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMVT leads at 0. 0% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SEPN or RXRX or IMVT or KYMR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SEPN or RXRX or IMVT or KYMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), +158. 8% 10Y return). Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX) carries a higher beta of 2. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KYMR: +158. 8%, RXRX: -81. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SEPN and RXRX and IMVT and KYMR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SEPN is a small-cap high-growth stock; RXRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.