REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SEVN vs WELL vs VTR vs TPVG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
Asset Management
SEVN vs WELL vs VTR vs TPVG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $128M | $149.25B | $41.15B | $243M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $44M | $11.63B | $6.13B | $97M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $1.43B | $260M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 66.6% | 39.1% | -4.3% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | 75.3% | 4.4% | 13.4% | 77.9% |
| Forward P/E | 7.9x | 78.4x | 118.0x | 6.5x |
| Total Debt | $488M | $21.38B | $13.22B | $469M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $123M | $5.03B | $741M | $20M |
SEVN vs WELL vs VTR vs TPVG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seven Hills Realty … (SEVN) | 100 | 72.7 | -27.3% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 420.4 | +320.4% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 247.6 | +147.6% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 59.8 | -40.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SEVN vs WELL vs VTR vs TPVG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SEVN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth -16.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.7%
- 96.4% FFO/revenue growth vs VTR's 18.5%
WELL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 223.1% 10Y total return vs VTR's 65.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- +42.7% vs SEVN's -18.1%
- 2.3% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5%, ROIC 0.5% vs 7.2%
VTR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 2.1%
- Beta 0.01, yield 2.1%, current ratio 0.96x
- Beta 0.01 vs TPVG's 0.83, lower leverage
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (6.5x vs 118.0x)
- 50.6% margin vs VTR's 4.2%
- 17.1% yield, vs WELL's 1.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 96.4% FFO/revenue growth vs VTR's 18.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.5x vs 118.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs VTR's 4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs TPVG's 0.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 17.1% yield, vs WELL's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs SEVN's -18.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5%, ROIC 0.5% vs 7.2% |
SEVN vs WELL vs VTR vs TPVG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SEVN vs WELL vs VTR vs TPVG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TPVG leads in 1 of 6 categories
SEVN leads 1 • WELL leads 1 • VTR leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 265.9x SEVN's $44M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VTR's 4.2%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $44M | $11.6B | $6.1B | $97M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $34M | $2.8B | $2.3B | -$22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $1.4B | $260M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $2.5B | $1.4B | $35M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.6% | +39.1% | -4.3% | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +75.3% | +4.4% | +13.4% | +77.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +34.9% | +12.3% | +4.2% | +50.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +37.4% | +21.9% | +22.4% | -58.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.8% | +40.3% | +22.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.7% | +22.5% | 0.0% | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SEVN and TPVG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 97% valuation discount to VTR's 160.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TPVG's 9.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $128M | $149.2B | $41.1B | $243M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $492M | $165.6B | $53.6B | $691M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.42x | 153.25x | 160.26x | 4.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.87x | 78.42x | 118.01x | 6.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.70x | 66.40x | 24.31x | 9.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.18x | 13.99x | 7.05x | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 3.35x | 3.18x | 0.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.53x | 52.41x | 31.25x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SEVN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEVN delivers a 5.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEVN's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs SEVN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +3.5% | +2.1% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +2.3% | +1.0% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.5% | +0.6% | +3.2% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.48x | 0.49x | 1.05x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $364M | $16.3B | $12.5B | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $123M | $5.0B | $741M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $488M | $21.4B | $13.2B | $469M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.52x | 0.26x | 1.40x | -1.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,649 for TPVG. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +42.7% total return vs SEVN's -18.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs TPVG's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.9% | +14.3% | +12.6% | -6.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.1% | +42.7% | +33.9% | +19.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.7% | +189.5% | +94.2% | -3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.9% | +202.3% | +74.8% | -13.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.6% | +223.1% | +65.0% | +93.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.2% | +42.5% | +24.8% | -1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
VTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPVG's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTR currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs SEVN's 65.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.13x | 0.01x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.86 | $219.59 | $88.50 | $7.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.90 | $142.65 | $61.76 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.5% | +97.0% | +97.8% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 60.2 | 56.2 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 105K | 2.6M | 3.4M | 504K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WELL and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SEVN as "Buy", WELL as "Buy", VTR as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 54.4% upside for SEVN (target: $13) vs 4.9% for VTR (target: $91). For income investors, TPVG offers the higher dividend yield at 17.11% vs WELL's 1.30%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | $226.50 | $90.80 | $8.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 34 | 32 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.7% | +1.3% | +2.1% | +17.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.24 | $2.76 | $1.86 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TPVG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SEVN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
SEVN vs WELL vs VTR vs TPVG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SEVN or WELL or VTR or TPVG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Seven Hills Realty Trust (SEVN) is the stronger pick with 96.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 18. 5% for Ventas, Inc. (VTR). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seven Hills Realty Trust (SEVN) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SEVN or WELL or VTR or TPVG?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 9x versus Ventas, Inc. at 160. 3x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SEVN or WELL or VTR or TPVG?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -13. 5% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +223. 1% versus SEVN's +3. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SEVN or WELL or VTR or TPVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 83β — meaning TPVG is approximately 8656% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 148% for Seven Hills Realty Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SEVN or WELL or VTR or TPVG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Seven Hills Realty Trust (SEVN) is pulling ahead at 96.
4% versus 18. 5% for Ventas, Inc. (VTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ventas, Inc. grew EPS 184. 2% year-over-year, compared to -16. 7% for Seven Hills Realty Trust. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SEVN or WELL or VTR or TPVG?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus 4. 3% for Ventas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SEVN or WELL or VTR or TPVG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 118. 0x for Ventas, Inc. — 111. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SEVN: 54. 4% to $13. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SEVN or WELL or VTR or TPVG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the highest yield at 17. 1%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is SEVN or WELL or VTR or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTR: +65. 0%, TPVG: +93. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SEVN and WELL and VTR and TPVG?
These companies operate in different sectors (SEVN (Real Estate) and WELL (Real Estate) and VTR (Real Estate) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.