Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SHBI vs NBTB vs FUNC vs CZWI vs CHMG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SHBI vs NBTB vs FUNC vs CZWI vs CHMG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $661M | $2.35B | $248M | $203M | $331M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $343M | $867M | $112M | $90M | $140M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $60M | $169M | $25M | $14M | $15M |
| Gross Margin | 63.2% | 72.1% | 68.8% | 54.7% | 64.2% |
| Operating Margin | 23.0% | 25.3% | 24.4% | 7.0% | 14.2% |
| Forward P/E | 9.7x | 10.8x | 8.7x | 11.8x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $111M | $327M | $188M | $52M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $50M | $185M | $78M | $119M | $23M |
SHBI vs NBTB vs FUNC vs CZWI vs CHMG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shore Bancshares, I… (SHBI) | 100 | 197.6 | +97.6% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 277.5 | +177.5% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| Chemung Financial C… (CHMG) | 100 | 272.1 | +172.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SHBI vs NBTB vs FUNC vs CZWI vs CHMG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SHBI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CHMG's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CHMG's 0.5%
NBTB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2%
FUNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 40.0%
- 289.2% 10Y total return vs CHMG's 198.0%
- PEG 0.77 vs CZWI's 2.32
- 16.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs SHBI's 1.01
CHMG is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.2% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- +54.5% vs NBTB's +9.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 9.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CHMG's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs SHBI's 1.01 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.5% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CHMG's 0.5% |
SHBI vs NBTB vs FUNC vs CZWI vs CHMG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SHBI vs NBTB vs FUNC vs CZWI vs CHMG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
FUNC leads 2 • SHBI leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • CHMG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 9.6x CZWI's $90M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHMG's 10.8%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $343M | $867M | $112M | $90M | $140M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $79M | $241M | $36M | $9M | $22M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $60M | $169M | $25M | $14M | $15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $225M | $16M | $11M | $47M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.2% | +72.1% | +68.8% | +54.7% | +64.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +25.3% | +24.4% | +7.0% | +14.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | +19.5% | +18.4% | +16.0% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +25.2% | +18.2% | +11.5% | +1.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.0% | +39.5% | +20.2% | +63.0% | +29.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SHBI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, SHBI trades at a 50% valuation discount to CHMG's 22.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 1.08x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $661M | $2.4B | $248M | $203M | $331M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $722M | $2.5B | $357M | $136M | $314M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.10x | 13.53x | 12.12x | 14.44x | 22.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.66x | 10.80x | 8.68x | 11.78x | 9.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.59x | 1.92x | 1.08x | 2.85x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.16x | 10.35x | 11.52x | 15.28x | 15.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.93x | 2.71x | 2.22x | 2.25x | 2.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 1.21x | 1.39x | 1.09x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.09x | 10.75x | 12.18x | 19.55x | 163.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for CHMG. CHMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHBI scores 7/9 vs CHMG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.4% | +9.5% | +12.5% | +7.8% | +6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +0.8% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | +7.9% | +5.9% | +2.0% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +2.4% | +8.5% | +0.6% | +5.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.17x | 1.05x | 0.28x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $61M | $142M | $109M | -$67M | -$18M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $50M | $185M | $78M | $119M | $23M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $111M | $327M | $188M | $52M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 1.05x | 1.01x | 0.16x | 0.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $23,452 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,989 for NBTB. Over the past 12 months, CHMG leads with a +54.5% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 47.1% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.2% | +9.3% | +4.4% | +21.5% | +27.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.3% | +9.0% | +27.8% | +45.6% | +54.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +87.1% | +54.1% | +218.6% | +160.0% | +108.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.5% | +29.9% | +134.5% | +71.2% | +70.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.1% | +102.2% | +289.2% | +157.0% | +198.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.2% | +15.5% | +47.1% | +37.5% | +27.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CZWI and CHMG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHBI's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHMG currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs FUNC's 91.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 0.89x | 0.72x | 0.46x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.68 | $46.92 | $41.95 | $22.62 | $70.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.03 | $39.20 | $28.00 | $12.83 | $43.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.6% | +96.1% | +91.0% | +93.2% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.8 | 57.3 | 50.6 | 63.7 | 67.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 234K | 236K | 11K | 40K | 10K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SHBI as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", FUNC as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", CHMG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.1% upside for NBTB (target: $46) vs -34.5% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.75 | $46.00 | $25.00 | — | $50.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +3.2% | +2.2% | +1.8% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 12 | 7 | 7 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.48 | $1.43 | $0.82 | $0.37 | $1.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +1.6% | +3.1% | 0.0% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). FUNC leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
SHBI vs NBTB vs FUNC vs CZWI vs CHMG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SHBI or NBTB or FUNC or CZWI or CHMG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 16.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Shore Bancshares, Inc. (SHBI) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shore Bancshares, Inc. (SHBI) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SHBI or NBTB or FUNC or CZWI or CHMG?
On trailing P/E, Shore Bancshares, Inc.
(SHBI) is the cheapest at 11. 1x versus Chemung Financial Corporation at 22. 0x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 77x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SHBI or NBTB or FUNC or CZWI or CHMG?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +134.
5%, compared to +29. 9% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +289. 2% versus SHBI's +100. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SHBI or NBTB or FUNC or CZWI or CHMG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Shore Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning SHBI is approximately 120% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SHBI or NBTB or FUNC or CZWI or CHMG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 16.
9% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First United Corporation grew EPS 40. 0% year-over-year, compared to -36. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SHBI or NBTB or FUNC or CZWI or CHMG?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 10. 8% for Chemung Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SHBI or NBTB or FUNC or CZWI or CHMG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 77x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBTB: 2. 1% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SHBI or NBTB or FUNC or CZWI or CHMG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is SHBI or NBTB or FUNC or CZWI or CHMG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, SHBI: +100. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SHBI and NBTB and FUNC and CZWI and CHMG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SHBI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; CHMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.