REIT - Hotel & Motel
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SHO vs HST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
SHO vs HST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel |
| Market Cap | $1.94B | $14.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $986M | $6.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38M | $765M |
| Gross Margin | 20.1% | 39.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 14.0% |
| Forward P/E | 129.9x | 19.8x |
| Total Debt | $925M | $5.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $109M | $768M |
SHO vs HST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sunstone Hotel Inve… (SHO) | 100 | 115.8 | +15.8% |
| Host Hotels & Resor… (HST) | 100 | 181.6 | +81.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SHO vs HST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SHO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 4.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 47.6%, current ratio 2.30x
- Beta 1.00, yield 4.3%, current ratio 2.30x
HST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.6%, EPS growth 11.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.6%
- 75.2% 10Y total return vs SHO's 12.0%
- 7.6% FFO/revenue growth vs SHO's 6.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.6% FFO/revenue growth vs SHO's 6.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.8x vs 129.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.5% margin vs SHO's 3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs HST's 1.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HST's 4.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +56.3% vs SHO's +27.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs SHO's 1.3%, ROIC 5.3% vs 2.0% |
SHO vs HST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SHO vs HST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HST is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 6.2x SHO's $986M. HST is the more profitable business, keeping 12.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SHO's 3.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $986M | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $190M | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38M | $765M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $132M | $862M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +39.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +14.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +12.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +14.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.0% | +12.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.0% | +26.7% |
Valuation Metrics
HST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.7x trailing earnings, HST trades at a 92% valuation discount to SHO's 242.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HST's 12.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHO's 13.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $14.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $19.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 242.32x | 19.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 129.91x | 19.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.18x | 12.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.02x | 2.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 2.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.68x | 17.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HST leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HST delivers a 11.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $2 for SHO. SHO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HST's 0.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HST scores 8/9 vs SHO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.9% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.5% | +6.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $816M | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $109M | $768M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $925M | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.58x | 4.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HST leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HST five years ago would be worth $14,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,226 for SHO. Over the past 12 months, HST leads with a +56.3% total return vs SHO's +27.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HST at 12.2% vs SHO's 3.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.3% | +20.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.8% | +56.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.7% | +41.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.7% | +47.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.0% | +75.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.1% | +12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
SHO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHO is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HST's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.33 | $21.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.14 | $14.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.6 | 64.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 8.1M |
Analyst Outlook
SHO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SHO as "Hold" and HST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.4% upside for SHO (target: $11) vs -7.7% for HST (target: $20). For income investors, SHO offers the higher dividend yield at 4.34% vs HST's 4.14%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.50 | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | $0.90 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.6% | +1.4% |
HST leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SHO leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
SHO vs HST: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SHO or HST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) is the stronger pick with 7. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 0% for Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO). Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SHO or HST?
On trailing P/E, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) is the cheapest at 19. 7x versus Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. at 242. 3x. On forward P/E, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SHO or HST?
Over the past 5 years, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) delivered a total return of +47. 5%, compared to -7. 7% for Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HST returned +75. 2% versus SHO's +12. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SHO or HST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. 's 1. 04β — meaning HST is approximately 4% more volatile than SHO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 84% for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SHO or HST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) is pulling ahead at 7. 6% versus 6. 0% for Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. grew EPS 11. 1% year-over-year, compared to -69. 8% for Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HST leads at 7. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SHO or HST?
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 5% net margin versus 2. 6% for Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HST leads at 13. 6% versus 7. 8% for SHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHO leads at 4. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SHO or HST more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) trades at 19. 8x forward P/E versus 129. 9x for Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. — 110. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHO: 2. 4% to $10. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SHO or HST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 4. 1% for Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST).
09Is SHO or HST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), 4. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HST: +75. 2%, SHO: +12. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SHO and HST?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.