Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SIFY vs GOOGL vs MSFT vs AMZN vs AAPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Software - Infrastructure
Specialty Retail
Consumer Electronics
SIFY vs GOOGL vs MSFT vs AMZN vs AAPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Internet Content & Information | Software - Infrastructure | Specialty Retail | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $1.15B | $4.81T | $3.13T | $2.92T | $4.22T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41.45B | $422.57B | $318.27B | $742.78B | $451.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.50B | $160.21B | $125.22B | $90.80B | $122.58B |
| Gross Margin | 34.2% | 60.4% | 68.3% | 50.6% | 47.9% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 32.7% | 46.8% | 11.5% | 32.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 29.6x | 25.3x | 34.8x | 33.8x |
| Total Debt | $39.51B | $59.29B | $112.18B | $152.99B | $112.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.00B | $30.71B | $30.24B | $86.81B | $35.93B |
SIFY vs GOOGL vs MSFT vs AMZN vs AAPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sify Technologies L… (SIFY) | 100 | 284.6 | +184.6% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 555.2 | +455.2% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 229.7 | +129.7% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 361.6 | +261.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SIFY vs GOOGL vs MSFT vs AMZN vs AAPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SIFY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +264.2% vs MSFT's -2.1%
GOOGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 34.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- PEG 0.99 vs AAPL's 1.89
- 15.1% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4%
- Lower P/E (29.6x vs 34.8x), PEG 0.99 vs 1.24
MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- 39.3% margin vs SIFY's -3.6%
Among these 5 stocks, AMZN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AAPL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs GOOGL's 10.0%
- 34.0% ROA vs SIFY's -1.8%, ROIC 67.4% vs 3.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.6x vs 34.8x), PEG 0.99 vs 1.24 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs SIFY's -3.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs AMZN's 1.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs SIFY's 0.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +264.2% vs MSFT's -2.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs SIFY's -1.8%, ROIC 67.4% vs 3.3% |
SIFY vs GOOGL vs MSFT vs AMZN vs AAPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SIFY vs GOOGL vs MSFT vs AMZN vs AAPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories
SIFY leads 1 • AAPL leads 1 • GOOGL leads 1 • AMZN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 17.9x SIFY's $41.4B. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SIFY's -3.6%. On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41.4B | $422.6B | $318.3B | $742.8B | $451.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.1B | $161.3B | $192.6B | $155.9B | $160.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.5B | $160.2B | $125.2B | $90.8B | $122.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $73.3B | $72.9B | -$2.5B | $129.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +60.4% | +68.3% | +50.6% | +47.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +32.7% | +46.8% | +11.5% | +32.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +37.9% | +39.3% | +12.2% | +27.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.2% | +17.3% | +22.9% | -0.3% | +28.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +21.8% | +18.3% | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.7% | +81.9% | +23.4% | +74.8% | +21.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SIFY leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.9x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 20% valuation discount to AAPL's 38.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.23x vs AAPL's 2.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $4.81T | $3.13T | $2.92T | $4.22T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $4.84T | $3.21T | $2.98T | $4.30T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -119.57x | 36.82x | 30.86x | 37.82x | 38.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 29.61x | 25.34x | 34.77x | 33.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.23x | 1.64x | 1.35x | 2.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.19x | 32.22x | 19.72x | 20.47x | 29.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.73x | 11.95x | 11.10x | 4.07x | 10.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.65x | 11.72x | 9.15x | 7.14x | 58.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 65.72x | 43.66x | 378.98x | 42.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $-8 for SIFY. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SIFY's 1.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs SIFY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.7% | +39.0% | +33.1% | +23.3% | +146.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.8% | +27.4% | +19.2% | +11.5% | +34.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +25.1% | +24.9% | +14.7% | +67.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.4% | +30.3% | +29.7% | +15.3% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.96x | 0.14x | 0.33x | 0.37x | 1.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $34.5B | $28.6B | $81.9B | $66.2B | $76.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.0B | $30.7B | $30.2B | $86.8B | $35.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39.5B | $59.3B | $112.2B | $153.0B | $112.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.82x | 392.15x | 55.65x | 39.96x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,793 for SIFY. Over the past 12 months, SIFY leads with a +264.2% total return vs MSFT's -2.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs MSFT's 11.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.2% | +26.4% | -10.8% | +19.7% | +6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +264.2% | +163.5% | -2.1% | +43.7% | +47.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.4% | +270.8% | +39.5% | +156.2% | +67.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.1% | +239.8% | +72.5% | +64.8% | +124.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.0% | +996.1% | +787.7% | +697.8% | +1174.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.8% | +54.8% | +11.7% | +36.8% | +18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GOOGL and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs MSFT's 75.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 1.26x | 0.89x | 1.51x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.85 | $400.10 | $555.45 | $278.56 | $292.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.15 | $147.84 | $356.28 | $185.01 | $193.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.0% | +99.5% | +75.8% | +97.3% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.7 | 83.4 | 54.0 | 81.1 | 69.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 56K | 28.3M | 32.5M | 45.5M | 39.8M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SIFY as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.1% upside for MSFT (target: $552) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). For income investors, MSFT offers the higher dividend yield at 0.77% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $406.28 | $551.75 | $306.77 | $317.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 82 | 81 | 94 | 110 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | +0.2% | +0.8% | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 19 | — | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.36 | $0.82 | $3.23 | — | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +0.6% | 0.0% | +2.1% |
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). SIFY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SIFY vs GOOGL vs MSFT vs AMZN vs AAPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SIFY or GOOGL or MSFT or AMZN or AAPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SIFY or GOOGL or MSFT or AMZN or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.
9x versus Apple Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, Microsoft Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 99x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SIFY or GOOGL or MSFT or AMZN or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -12. 1% for Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1174% versus SIFY's +141. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SIFY or GOOGL or MSFT or AMZN or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 71% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 196% for Sify Technologies Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SIFY or GOOGL or MSFT or AMZN or AAPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alphabet Inc. grew EPS 34. 5% year-over-year, compared to -877. 8% for Sify Technologies Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SIFY leads at 13. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SIFY or GOOGL or MSFT or AMZN or AAPL?
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -2. 0% for Sify Technologies Limited — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus 5. 7% for SIFY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MSFT leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SIFY or GOOGL or MSFT or AMZN or AAPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 99x versus Apple Inc. 's 1. 89x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) trades at 25. 3x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSFT: 31. 1% to $551. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SIFY or GOOGL or MSFT or AMZN or AAPL?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. SIFY, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SIFY or GOOGL or MSFT or AMZN or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, SIFY: +141. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SIFY and GOOGL and MSFT and AMZN and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (SIFY (Communication Services) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and MSFT (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SIFY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while SIFY, GOOGL, AMZN, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.