Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SIGA vs DBVT vs AGEN vs REGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
SIGA vs DBVT vs AGEN vs REGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $339M | $1712.35T | $132M | $73.68B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $94M | $0.00 | $114M | $14.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4.04T | $-168M | $115K | $4.42B |
| Gross Margin | 61.8% | — | 35.7% | 84.5% |
| Operating Margin | 27.7% | — | -17.7% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | 2.8x | — | 1.8x | 15.3x |
| Total Debt | $595K | $22M | $10M | $2.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $155M | $194M | $3M | $3.12B |
SIGA vs DBVT vs AGEN vs REGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIGA Technologies, … (SIGA) | 100 | 79.0 | -21.0% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 5.0 | -95.0% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 115.7 | +15.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SIGA vs DBVT vs AGEN vs REGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SIGA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 12.7%
- 7.6% 10Y total return vs REGN's 90.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 11.83x
- Beta 1.15, yield 12.7%, current ratio 11.83x
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +110.4% vs SIGA's +1.5%
AGEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- 10.4% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- Lower P/E (1.8x vs 15.3x)
REGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.
- 29.6% margin vs SIGA's -43K%
- Beta 0.81 vs AGEN's 2.72
- 11.1% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.8x vs 15.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs SIGA's -43K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs AGEN's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | 12.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs SIGA's +1.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
SIGA vs DBVT vs AGEN vs REGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SIGA vs DBVT vs AGEN vs REGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SIGA leads in 2 of 6 categories
AGEN leads 1 • REGN leads 1 • DBVT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SIGA and REGN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $14.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SIGA's -43117.4%. On growth, AGEN holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $94M | $0 | $114M | $14.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | -$112M | -$10M | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4.04T | -$168M | $115,000 | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $33M | -$151M | -$159M | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.8% | — | +35.7% | +84.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | — | -17.7% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -43117.4% | — | +0.1% | +29.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.2% | — | -139.1% | +27.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.3% | — | +27.5% | +19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +91.5% | +85.3% | -7.2% |
Valuation Metrics
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, SIGA trades at a 16% valuation discount to REGN's 17.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SIGA's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REGN's 17.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $339M | $1712.35T | $132M | $73.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $185M | $1712.35T | $140M | $73.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.33x | -0.76x | -1102.94x | 17.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.78x | — | 1.79x | 15.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.70x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.60x | — | — | 17.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.58x | — | 1.16x | 5.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.70x | 0.66x | — | 2.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.96x | — | — | 18.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SIGA and REGN each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REGN delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. SIGA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DBVT's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGEN scores 6/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.7% | -130.2% | — | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.4% | -89.0% | +0.1% | +11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +33.7% | — | — | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.3% | -145.7% | — | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.13x | — | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$154M | -$172M | $7M | -$412M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $155M | $194M | $3M | $3.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $595,169 | $22M | $10M | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -189.82x | 1.11x | 108.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SIGA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REGN five years ago would be worth $14,365 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $611 for AGEN. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs SIGA's +1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SIGA at 6.9% vs AGEN's -51.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.0% | +4.9% | +16.1% | -8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.5% | +110.4% | +27.1% | +27.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.2% | +19.7% | -88.2% | -5.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.4% | -69.1% | -93.9% | +43.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +764.0% | -87.0% | -94.3% | +90.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.9% | +6.2% | -51.0% | -1.7% |
Risk & Volatility
REGN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
REGN is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REGN currently trades 86.4% from its 52-week high vs SIGA's 49.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.26x | 2.72x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.62 | $26.18 | $7.34 | $821.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.29 | $7.53 | $2.71 | $476.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.2% | +76.3% | +51.1% | +86.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.0 | 48.1 | 48.8 | 44.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 688K | 252K | 814K | 631K |
Analyst Outlook
SIGA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SIGA as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy", REGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 22.1% for REGN (target: $866). For income investors, SIGA offers the higher dividend yield at 12.73% vs REGN's 0.48%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $7.33 | $865.68 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 15 | 11 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +12.7% | — | — | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | — | — | $3.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +5.4% |
SIGA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). AGEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SIGA vs DBVT vs AGEN vs REGN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SIGA or DBVT or AGEN or REGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 8% for SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA). SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (2. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SIGA or DBVT or AGEN or REGN?
On trailing P/E, SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) is the cheapest at 14. 3x versus Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 17. 1x. On forward P/E, Agenus Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SIGA or DBVT or AGEN or REGN?
Over the past 5 years, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) delivered a total return of +43. 6%, compared to -93. 9% for Agenus Inc. (AGEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SIGA returned +764. 0% versus AGEN's -94. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SIGA or DBVT or AGEN or REGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AGEN is approximately 238% more volatile than REGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 13% for DBV Technologies S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SIGA or DBVT or AGEN or REGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -31. 8% for SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REGN leads at 5. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SIGA or DBVT or AGEN or REGN?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SIGA leads at 25. 1% versus -18. 0% for AGEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGEN leads at 90. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SIGA or DBVT or AGEN or REGN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) trades at 1. 8x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 13. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131. 8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — SIGA or DBVT or AGEN or REGN?
In this comparison, SIGA (12.
7% yield), REGN (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. DBVT, AGEN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SIGA or DBVT or AGEN or REGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), 12. 7% yield, +764. 0% 10Y return). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SIGA: +764. 0%, AGEN: -94. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SIGA and DBVT and AGEN and REGN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SIGA is a small-cap deep-value stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. SIGA pays a dividend while DBVT, AGEN, REGN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.