Entertainment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SIRI vs IHRT vs AUDC vs GOOGL vs SPOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Broadcasting
Communication Equipment
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
SIRI vs IHRT vs AUDC vs GOOGL vs SPOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Broadcasting | Communication Equipment | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $9.00B | $880M | $224M | $4.81T | $87.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.58B | $3.86B | $247M | $422.57B | $17.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $846M | $-473M | $7M | $160.21B | $2.72B |
| Gross Margin | 45.4% | 78.5% | 65.3% | 60.4% | 32.3% |
| Operating Margin | 18.0% | -0.5% | 5.6% | 32.7% | 13.7% |
| Forward P/E | 8.5x | — | 12.7x | 29.6x | 33.0x |
| Total Debt | $9.71B | $5.79B | $69M | $59.29B | $2.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $94M | $271K | $46M | $30.71B | $5.26B |
SIRI vs IHRT vs AUDC vs GOOGL vs SPOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sirius XM Holdings … (SIRI) | 100 | 46.0 | -54.0% |
| iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) | 100 | 65.2 | -34.8% |
| AudioCodes Ltd. (AUDC) | 100 | 22.8 | -77.2% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 555.2 | +455.2% |
| Spotify Technology … (SPOT) | 100 | 236.2 | +136.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SIRI vs IHRT vs AUDC vs GOOGL vs SPOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SIRI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 3.8%
- PEG 0.17 vs GOOGL's 0.99
- Lower P/E (8.5x vs 33.0x)
- Beta 0.65 vs IHRT's 1.82
IHRT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +415.5% vs SPOT's -35.0%
AUDC is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.39, yield 4.5%, current ratio 2.21x
GOOGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs SPOT's 186.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SIRI's -1.6%
- 37.9% margin vs IHRT's -12.2%
SPOT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.7%, EPS growth 91.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SIRI's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 33.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs IHRT's -12.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs IHRT's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs AUDC's 4.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +415.5% vs SPOT's -35.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs IHRT's -12.0%, ROIC 25.1% vs -0.4% |
SIRI vs IHRT vs AUDC vs GOOGL vs SPOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SIRI vs IHRT vs AUDC vs GOOGL vs SPOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories
SIRI leads 1 • IHRT leads 0 • AUDC leads 0 • SPOT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 1708.2x AUDC's $247M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IHRT's -12.2%. On growth, GOOGL holds the edge at +21.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.6B | $3.9B | $247M | $422.6B | $17.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.1B | $339M | $18M | $161.3B | $2.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $846M | -$473M | $7M | $160.2B | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.4B | $11M | $24M | $73.3B | $3.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.4% | +78.5% | +65.3% | +60.4% | +32.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | -0.5% | +5.6% | +32.7% | +13.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | -12.2% | +2.8% | +37.9% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +0.3% | +9.6% | +17.3% | +18.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.1% | +0.8% | +2.9% | +21.8% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.0% | -20.8% | -44.2% | +81.9% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SIRI leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, SIRI trades at a 68% valuation discount to GOOGL's 36.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SIRI offers better value at 0.24x vs GOOGL's 1.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.0B | $880M | $224M | $4.81T | $88.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.6B | $6.7B | $248M | $4.84T | $84.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.89x | -1.86x | 26.94x | 36.82x | 34.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.53x | — | 12.65x | 29.61x | 32.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.24x | — | — | 1.23x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.04x | 19.65x | 13.55x | 32.22x | 31.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.05x | 0.23x | 0.91x | 11.95x | 4.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.83x | — | 1.41x | 11.72x | 9.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.23x | 80.64x | 9.78x | 65.72x | 26.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOGL delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $4 for AUDC. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SIRI's 0.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GOOGL scores 7/9 vs IHRT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | — | +4.0% | +39.0% | +35.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | -12.0% | +2.1% | +27.4% | +19.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.2% | -0.4% | +5.8% | +25.1% | +40.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | -0.5% | +5.6% | +30.3% | +26.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.84x | — | 0.40x | 0.14x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.6B | $5.8B | $24M | $28.6B | -$2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $94M | $270,900 | $46M | $30.7B | $5.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9.7B | $5.8B | $69M | $59.3B | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.50x | -0.17x | 5.27x | 392.15x | 84.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,504 for IHRT. Over the past 12 months, IHRT leads with a +415.5% total return vs SPOT's -35.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs SIRI's -6.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.7% | +36.6% | -2.2% | +26.4% | -25.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.6% | +415.5% | +3.9% | +163.5% | -35.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.6% | +85.9% | -5.7% | +270.8% | +195.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.8% | -75.0% | -67.4% | +239.8% | +78.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.8% | -68.5% | +189.1% | +996.1% | +186.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.2% | +23.0% | -1.9% | +54.8% | +43.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SIRI and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SIRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IHRT's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs SPOT's 54.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 1.82x | 1.39x | 1.26x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.77 | $6.56 | $11.50 | $400.10 | $785.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.77 | $1.08 | $6.95 | $147.84 | $405.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.0% | +86.4% | +72.6% | +99.5% | +54.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.8 | 68.6 | 44.4 | 83.4 | 32.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.8M | 986K | 104K | 28.3M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SIRI and AUDC and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SIRI as "Buy", IHRT as "Buy", AUDC as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy", SPOT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 127.5% upside for AUDC (target: $19) vs -38.3% for IHRT (target: $4). For income investors, AUDC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.52% vs IHRT's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.75 | $3.50 | $19.00 | $406.28 | $630.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 10 | 8 | 82 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.8% | +0.2% | +4.5% | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.02 | $0.01 | $0.38 | $0.82 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | 0.0% | +13.7% | +0.9% | +0.6% |
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SIRI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SIRI vs IHRT vs AUDC vs GOOGL vs SPOT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SIRI or IHRT or AUDC or GOOGL or SPOT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the stronger pick with 15. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI). Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SIRI or IHRT or AUDC or GOOGL or SPOT?
On trailing P/E, Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) is the cheapest at 11. 9x versus Alphabet Inc. at 36. 8x. On forward P/E, Sirius XM Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sirius XM Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 17x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SIRI or IHRT or AUDC or GOOGL or SPOT?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -75. 0% for iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus IHRT's -68. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SIRI or IHRT or AUDC or GOOGL or SPOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus iHeartMedia, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning IHRT is approximately 180% more volatile than SIRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 84% for Sirius XM Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SIRI or IHRT or AUDC or GOOGL or SPOT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is pulling ahead at 15. 1% versus -1. 6% for Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sirius XM Holdings Inc. grew EPS 145. 6% year-over-year, compared to -38. 0% for AudioCodes Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPOT leads at 13. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SIRI or IHRT or AUDC or GOOGL or SPOT?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -12. 2% for iHeartMedia, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -0. 5% for IHRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IHRT leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SIRI or IHRT or AUDC or GOOGL or SPOT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 17x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 33. 0x for Spotify Technology S. A. — 24. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AUDC: 127. 5% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SIRI or IHRT or AUDC or GOOGL or SPOT?
In this comparison, AUDC (4.
5% yield), SIRI (3. 8% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield), IHRT (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. SPOT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SIRI or IHRT or AUDC or GOOGL or SPOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 3. 8% yield). iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SIRI: -7. 8%, IHRT: -68. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SIRI and IHRT and AUDC and GOOGL and SPOT?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SIRI is a small-cap deep-value stock; IHRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AUDC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; SPOT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SIRI, AUDC pay a dividend while IHRT, GOOGL, SPOT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.