REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SITC vs SPG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
SITC vs SPG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $293M | $65.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90M | $6.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $176M | $4.61B |
| Gross Margin | -42.1% | 85.7% |
| Operating Margin | -10.8% | 49.9% |
| Forward P/E | 1.6x | 30.3x |
| Total Debt | $74M | $29.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $119M | $823M |
SITC vs SPG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) | 100 | 24.6 | -75.4% |
| Simon Property Grou… (SPG) | 100 | 349.1 | +249.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SITC vs SPG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SITC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.05, yield 100.0%
- PEG 0.05 vs SPG's 0.96
- Lower P/E (1.6x vs 30.3x), PEG 0.05 vs 0.96
SPG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.7%, EPS growth 94.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
- 28.9% 10Y total return vs SITC's -78.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.7% FFO/revenue growth vs SITC's -55.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.6x vs 30.3x), PEG 0.05 vs 0.96 | |
| Quality / Margins | 195.7% margin vs SPG's 72.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs SITC's 1.05 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.1% vs SITC's +29.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.2% ROA vs SPG's 11.4%, ROIC -0.2% vs 7.6% |
SITC vs SPG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SITC vs SPG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPG is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.4B annually — 70.9x SITC's $90M. SITC is the more profitable business, keeping 195.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPG's 72.5%. On growth, SPG holds the edge at +13.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90M | $6.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $28M | $4.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $176M | $4.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $133M | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -42.1% | +85.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.8% | +49.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +195.7% | +72.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +148.5% | +35.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -78.3% | +13.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.7% | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SITC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.6x trailing earnings, SITC trades at a 88% valuation discount to SPG's 14.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SITC offers better value at 0.05x vs SPG's 0.45x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $293M | $65.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $248M | $94.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.65x | 14.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.05x | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.73x | 20.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.38x | 10.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | 9.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.93x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SITC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPG delivers a 68.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $69 in annual profit, vs $48 for SITC. SITC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPG's 4.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITC scores 6/9 vs SPG's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +48.0% | +68.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +32.2% | +11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.3% | +9.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 4.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$45M | $29.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $119M | $823M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $74M | $29.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.60x | 3.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPG five years ago would be worth $19,142 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,170 for SITC. Over the past 12 months, SPG leads with a +30.1% total return vs SITC's +29.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPG at 27.9% vs SITC's -29.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.8% | +10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.3% | +30.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.2% | +109.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.3% | +91.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.5% | +28.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.0% | +27.9% |
Risk & Volatility
SPG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPG is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SITC's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPG currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs SITC's 42.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.10 | $208.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.24 | $155.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.6% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 61.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 777K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
SITC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SITC as "Hold" and SPG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.4% upside for SITC (target: $8) vs -2.2% for SPG (target: $197). SITC is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $197.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $6.78 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
SPG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SITC leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
SITC vs SPG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SITC or SPG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the stronger pick with 6. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 6% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) offers the better valuation at 1. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) a "Hold" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SITC or SPG?
On trailing P/E, SITE Centers Corp.
(SITC) is the cheapest at 1. 6x versus Simon Property Group, Inc. at 14. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SITC or SPG?
Over the past 5 years, Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) delivered a total return of +91. 4%, compared to -68. 3% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPG returned +28. 9% versus SITC's -78. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SITC or SPG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus SITE Centers Corp. 's 1. 05β — meaning SITC is approximately 73% more volatile than SPG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 4% for Simon Property Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SITC or SPG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is pulling ahead at 6. 7% versus -55. 6% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Simon Property Group, Inc. grew EPS 94. 8% year-over-year, compared to -65. 3% for SITE Centers Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPG leads at 6. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SITC or SPG?
SITE Centers Corp.
(SITC) is the more profitable company, earning 144. 4% net margin versus 72. 5% for Simon Property Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 144. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPG leads at 49. 9% versus -1. 3% for SITC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPG leads at 85. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SITC or SPG more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SITC: 43.
4% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SITC or SPG?
In this comparison, SITC (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. SPG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SITC or SPG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SITE Centers Corp.
(SITC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 05), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SITC: -78. 5%, SPG: +28. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SITC and SPG?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
SITC pays a dividend while SPG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.