Broadcasting
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SJ vs HUYA vs DOYU vs BILI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Internet Content & Information
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
SJ vs HUYA vs DOYU vs BILI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Broadcasting | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $47M | $481M | $142M | $7.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.26B | $6.11B | $4.20B | $29.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-587M | $-153M | $-202M | $220M |
| Gross Margin | 18.3% | 12.7% | 9.2% | 35.9% |
| Operating Margin | -6.2% | -3.4% | -7.1% | 1.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.0x | 4.3x | 3.1x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $49M | $16M | $5.15B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $308M | $1.19B | $1.02B | $10.25B |
SJ vs HUYA vs DOYU vs BILI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scienjoy Holding Co… (SJ) | 100 | 16.2 | -83.8% |
| HUYA Inc. (HUYA) | 100 | 20.6 | -79.4% |
| DouYu International… (DOYU) | 100 | 5.2 | -94.8% |
| Bilibili Inc. (BILI) | 100 | 67.8 | -32.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SJ vs HUYA vs DOYU vs BILI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SJ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.04 vs BILI's 1.77, lower leverage
HUYA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -60.1% 10Y total return vs BILI's 95.6%
- +26.9% vs DOYU's -34.2%
DOYU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 3.63x
- Beta 1.10, yield 100.0%, current ratio 3.63x
- 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HUYA's 56.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
BILI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 72.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 19.1% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8%
- Lower P/E (3.1x vs 4.3x)
- 0.8% margin vs SJ's -46.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.1% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.1x vs 4.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.8% margin vs SJ's -46.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs BILI's 1.77, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HUYA's 56.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.9% vs DOYU's -34.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.6% ROA vs SJ's -62.6%, ROIC -8.4% vs -9.6% |
SJ vs HUYA vs DOYU vs BILI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SJ vs HUYA vs DOYU vs BILI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BILI leads in 2 of 6 categories
DOYU leads 2 • SJ leads 1 • HUYA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BILI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BILI is the larger business by revenue, generating $29.4B annually — 23.3x SJ's $1.3B. BILI is the more profitable business, keeping 0.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SJ's -46.4%. On growth, BILI holds the edge at +19.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $6.1B | $4.2B | $29.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$104M | -$120M | -$275M | $845M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$587M | -$153M | -$202M | $220M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $0 | $0 | $3.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +12.7% | +9.2% | +35.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | -3.4% | -7.1% | +1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -46.4% | -2.5% | -4.8% | +0.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | -1.9% | -5.9% | +11.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.5% | +1.7% | +2.1% | +19.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -125.0% | -118.5% | +179.1% | +134.9% |
Valuation Metrics
DOYU leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $47M | $481M | $142M | $7.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $314M | -$5M | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.53x | -103.70x | -3.31x | -46.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 3.97x | 4.28x | 3.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 38.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 0.54x | 0.23x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.53x | 0.67x | 0.23x | 4.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.56x | — | — | 11.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BILI leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BILI delivers a 1.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-75 for SJ. DOYU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BILI's 0.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUYA scores 7/9 vs DOYU's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -74.7% | -2.4% | -6.5% | +1.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -62.6% | -1.7% | -4.7% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.6% | -1.7% | -15.4% | -8.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.5% | -2.1% | -10.3% | -8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.01x | 0.00x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$294M | -$1.1B | -$1.0B | -$5.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $308M | $1.2B | $1.0B | $10.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $49M | $16M | $5.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HUYA and DOYU each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HUYA five years ago would be worth $3,916 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,249 for SJ. Over the past 12 months, HUYA leads with a +26.9% total return vs DOYU's -34.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DOYU at 31.1% vs SJ's -35.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +55.1% | +5.6% | -31.8% | -16.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.3% | +26.9% | -34.2% | +25.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.5% | +99.7% | +125.5% | +10.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.5% | -60.8% | -71.6% | -78.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.8% | -60.1% | -78.8% | +95.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.8% | +25.9% | +31.1% | +3.2% |
Risk & Volatility
SJ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SJ is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BILI's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SJ currently trades 67.5% from its 52-week high vs DOYU's 50.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.04x | 1.17x | 1.10x | 1.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.63 | $4.93 | $9.34 | $36.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.45 | $2.21 | $4.28 | $17.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.5% | +64.9% | +50.3% | +60.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 54.2 | 47.0 | 43.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 1.0M | 26K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
DOYU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HUYA as "Buy", DOYU as "Hold", BILI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 92.1% upside for DOYU (target: $9) vs 7.8% for HUYA (target: $3). For income investors, DOYU offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs HUYA's 56.67%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.45 | $9.03 | $34.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 7 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +56.7% | +100.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $12.34 | $68.16 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.6% | +10.9% | +0.2% |
BILI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DOYU leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SJ vs HUYA vs DOYU vs BILI: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SJ or HUYA or DOYU or BILI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bilibili Inc.
(BILI) is the stronger pick with 19. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). Analysts rate HUYA Inc. (HUYA) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SJ or HUYA or DOYU or BILI?
Over the past 5 years, HUYA Inc.
(HUYA) delivered a total return of -60. 8%, compared to -87. 5% for Scienjoy Holding Corporation (SJ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BILI returned +95. 6% versus SJ's -88. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SJ or HUYA or DOYU or BILI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scienjoy Holding Corporation (SJ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
04β versus Bilibili Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning BILI is approximately 3969% more volatile than SJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 36% for Bilibili Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SJ or HUYA or DOYU or BILI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bilibili Inc.
(BILI) is pulling ahead at 19. 1% versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HUYA Inc. grew EPS 75. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1572. 7% for Scienjoy Holding Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BILI leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SJ or HUYA or DOYU or BILI?
HUYA Inc.
(HUYA) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 8% net margin versus -47. 3% for Scienjoy Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps -0. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUYA leads at -3. 1% versus -13. 2% for DOYU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BILI leads at 32. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SJ or HUYA or DOYU or BILI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bilibili Inc.
(BILI) trades at 3. 1x forward P/E versus 4. 3x for DouYu International Holdings Limited — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOYU: 92. 1% to $9. 03.
07Which pays a better dividend — SJ or HUYA or DOYU or BILI?
In this comparison, DOYU (100.
0% yield), HUYA (56. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SJ, BILI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is SJ or HUYA or DOYU or BILI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Scienjoy Holding Corporation (SJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
04)). Bilibili Inc. (BILI) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SJ: -88. 8%, BILI: +95. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SJ and HUYA and DOYU and BILI?
These companies operate in different sectors (SJ (Communication Services) and HUYA (Communication Services) and DOYU (Communication Services) and BILI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SJ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DOYU is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BILI is a small-cap high-growth stock. HUYA, DOYU pay a dividend while SJ, BILI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.