Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SKLZ vs GFAI vs BCO vs HUYA vs ARMK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Security & Protection Services
Entertainment
Specialty Business Services
SKLZ vs GFAI vs BCO vs HUYA vs ARMK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Security & Protection Services | Security & Protection Services | Entertainment | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $109M | $10M | $4.44B | $481M | $11.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $104M | $72M | $5.39B | $6.11B | $18.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-70M | $-24M | $180M | $-153M | $317M |
| Gross Margin | 87.5% | 15.1% | 26.1% | 12.7% | 7.0% |
| Operating Margin | -68.3% | -27.4% | 10.7% | -3.4% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 11.7x | 4.0x | 20.3x |
| Total Debt | $129M | $3M | $4.93B | $49M | $5.72B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $195M | $22M | $2.27B | $1.19B | $639M |
SKLZ vs GFAI vs BCO vs HUYA vs ARMK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skillz Inc. (SKLZ) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| The Brink's Company (BCO) | 100 | 158.2 | +58.2% |
| HUYA Inc. (HUYA) | 100 | 12.4 | -87.6% |
| Aramark (ARMK) | 100 | 182.1 | +82.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKLZ vs GFAI vs BCO vs HUYA vs ARMK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKLZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 9.5% revenue growth vs HUYA's -13.1%
- +34.7% vs GFAI's -53.2%
Among these 5 stocks, GFAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 0.9%
- 293.0% 10Y total return vs ARMK's 97.1%
- 3.3% margin vs SKLZ's -67.4%
- 0.9% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HUYA's 56.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
HUYA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 3.14x
- Beta 1.17, yield 56.7%, current ratio 3.14x
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 20.3x)
ARMK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 23.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.6%
- Beta 0.71 vs SKLZ's 2.57
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% revenue growth vs HUYA's -13.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 20.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.3% margin vs SKLZ's -67.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs SKLZ's 2.57 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HUYA's 56.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.7% vs GFAI's -53.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.5% ROA vs GFAI's -50.2%, ROIC 14.3% vs -41.6% |
SKLZ vs GFAI vs BCO vs HUYA vs ARMK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SKLZ vs GFAI vs BCO vs HUYA vs ARMK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
ARMK leads 1 • SKLZ leads 0 • GFAI leads 0 • HUYA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARMK is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.8B annually — 259.4x GFAI's $72M. BCO is the more profitable business, keeping 3.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKLZ's -67.4%. On growth, SKLZ holds the edge at +53.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $104M | $72M | $5.4B | $6.1B | $18.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$70M | -$12M | $797M | -$120M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$70M | -$24M | $180M | -$153M | $317M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$70M | -$6M | $544M | $0 | $257M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.5% | +15.1% | +26.1% | +12.7% | +7.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -68.3% | -27.4% | +10.7% | -3.4% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -67.4% | -32.9% | +3.3% | -2.5% | +1.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -67.3% | -8.8% | +10.1% | -1.9% | +1.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.8% | +3.6% | +10.3% | +1.7% | +6.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.7% | +38.9% | -35.3% | -118.5% | -7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GFAI and BCO and HUYA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.9x trailing earnings, BCO trades at a 38% valuation discount to ARMK's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BCO's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARMK's 13.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $109M | $10M | $4.4B | $481M | $11.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $43M | -$9M | $7.1B | $314M | $16.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.55x | -0.89x | 22.93x | -103.70x | 36.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 11.73x | 3.97x | 20.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.38x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 8.01x | — | 13.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.04x | 0.28x | 0.84x | 0.54x | 0.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 0.16x | 11.14x | 0.67x | 3.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 10.17x | — | 26.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BCO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BCO delivers a 45.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-70 for GFAI. HUYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BCO's 12.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUYA scores 7/9 vs SKLZ's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -52.5% | -69.7% | +45.6% | -2.4% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.8% | -50.2% | +2.5% | -1.7% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -148.3% | -41.6% | +14.3% | -1.7% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.0% | -19.1% | +12.1% | -2.1% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.15x | 0.08x | 12.10x | 0.01x | 1.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$66M | -$19M | $2.7B | -$1.1B | $5.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $195M | $22M | $2.3B | $1.2B | $639M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $129M | $3M | $4.9B | $49M | $5.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.08x | -167.24x | 3.90x | — | 2.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SKLZ and HUYA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARMK five years ago would be worth $17,052 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $46 for GFAI. Over the past 12 months, SKLZ leads with a +34.7% total return vs GFAI's -53.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HUYA at 25.9% vs GFAI's -60.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +58.3% | -26.3% | -7.3% | +5.6% | +23.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.7% | -53.2% | +19.4% | +26.9% | +19.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.7% | -93.8% | +75.3% | +99.7% | +87.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -99.5% | +39.3% | -60.8% | +70.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.5% | -99.5% | +293.0% | -60.1% | +97.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.9% | -60.4% | +20.6% | +25.9% | +23.3% |
Risk & Volatility
ARMK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARMK is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKLZ's 2.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARMK currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs GFAI's 31.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.57x | 2.31x | 1.10x | 1.17x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.00 | $1.50 | $136.37 | $4.93 | $46.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.23 | $0.38 | $80.10 | $2.21 | $35.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.9% | +31.5% | +79.0% | +64.9% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 47.0 | 52.0 | 54.2 | 62.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 378K | 543K | 1.0M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BCO and HUYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SKLZ as "Hold", BCO as "Buy", HUYA as "Buy", ARMK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 931.5% upside for SKLZ (target: $72) vs 4.7% for ARMK (target: $47). For income investors, HUYA offers the higher dividend yield at 56.67% vs ARMK's 0.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $72.00 | — | $163.00 | $3.45 | $47.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | — | 9 | 15 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | +56.7% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 6 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 | $12.34 | $0.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.5% | 0.0% | +4.7% | +7.6% | +1.2% |
BCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARMK leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.
SKLZ vs GFAI vs BCO vs HUYA vs ARMK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKLZ or GFAI or BCO or HUYA or ARMK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Skillz Inc.
(SKLZ) is the stronger pick with 9. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 1% for HUYA Inc. (HUYA). The Brink's Company (BCO) offers the better valuation at 22. 9x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Brink's Company (BCO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKLZ or GFAI or BCO or HUYA or ARMK?
On trailing P/E, The Brink's Company (BCO) is the cheapest at 22.
9x versus Aramark at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, HUYA Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKLZ or GFAI or BCO or HUYA or ARMK?
Over the past 5 years, Aramark (ARMK) delivered a total return of +70.
5%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BCO returned +293. 0% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKLZ or GFAI or BCO or HUYA or ARMK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aramark (ARMK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
71β versus Skillz Inc. 's 2. 57β — meaning SKLZ is approximately 263% more volatile than ARMK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HUYA Inc. (HUYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 12% for The Brink's Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKLZ or GFAI or BCO or HUYA or ARMK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Skillz Inc.
(SKLZ) is pulling ahead at 9. 5% versus -13. 1% for HUYA Inc. (HUYA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guardforce AI Co. , Limited grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to -67. 0% for Skillz Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARMK leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKLZ or GFAI or BCO or HUYA or ARMK?
The Brink's Company (BCO) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
8% net margin versus -67. 4% for Skillz Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCO leads at 11. 3% versus -68. 3% for SKLZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKLZ leads at 87. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKLZ or GFAI or BCO or HUYA or ARMK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, HUYA Inc.
(HUYA) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 20. 3x for Aramark — 16. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKLZ: 931. 5% to $72. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKLZ or GFAI or BCO or HUYA or ARMK?
In this comparison, HUYA (56.
7% yield), BCO (0. 9% yield), ARMK (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. SKLZ, GFAI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKLZ or GFAI or BCO or HUYA or ARMK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aramark (ARMK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71), 0. 9% yield). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARMK: +97. 1%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKLZ and GFAI and BCO and HUYA and ARMK?
These companies operate in different sectors (SKLZ (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials) and BCO (Industrials) and HUYA (Communication Services) and ARMK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SKLZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ARMK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BCO, HUYA, ARMK pay a dividend while SKLZ, GFAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.