Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SKYE vs CRBP vs ABBV vs HALO vs PFE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SKYE
Skye Bioscience, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$30M
5Y Perf.-96.5%
CRBP
Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$137M
5Y Perf.-95.1%
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$356.49B
5Y Perf.+117.5%
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.55B
5Y Perf.+164.2%
PFE
Pfizer Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$146.02B
5Y Perf.-29.1%

SKYE vs CRBP vs ABBV vs HALO vs PFE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SKYE logoSKYE
CRBP logoCRBP
ABBV logoABBV
HALO logoHALO
PFE logoPFE
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - GeneralBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - General
Market Cap$30M$137M$356.49B$7.55B$146.02B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$61.16B$1.40B$63.31B
Net Income (TTM)$-56M$-79M$4.23B$317M$7.49B
Gross Margin70.2%81.9%69.3%
Operating Margin26.7%58.4%23.4%
Forward P/E14.2x8.0x8.7x
Total Debt$274K$2M$69.07B$0.00$67.42B
Cash & Equiv.$6M$28M$5.23B$134M$1.14B

SKYE vs CRBP vs ABBV vs HALO vs PFELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SKYE
CRBP
ABBV
HALO
PFE
StockMay 20May 26Return
Skye Bioscience, In… (SKYE)1003.5-96.5%
Corbus Pharmaceutic… (CRBP)1004.9-95.1%
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV)100217.5+117.5%
Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO)100264.2+164.2%
Pfizer Inc. (PFE)10070.9-29.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SKYE vs CRBP vs ABBV vs HALO vs PFE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HALO leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. ABBV and PFE also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SKYE
Skye Bioscience, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SKYE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
CRBP
Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CRBP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.22, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 8.07x
  • +64.8% vs SKYE's -51.8%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
The Defensive Choice

ABBV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.

  • Beta 0.28 vs SKYE's 2.13
Best for: stability
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

HALO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 37.6%, EPS growth -25.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.4%
  • 5.6% 10Y total return vs ABBV's 293.8%
  • 37.6% revenue growth vs SKYE's -112.9%
  • Lower P/E (8.0x vs 8.7x)
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
The Income Pick

PFE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.49, yield 6.7%
  • Beta 0.49, yield 6.7%, current ratio 1.16x
  • 6.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ABBV's 3.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHALO logoHALO37.6% revenue growth vs SKYE's -112.9%
ValueHALO logoHALOLower P/E (8.0x vs 8.7x)
Quality / MarginsHALO logoHALO22.7% margin vs CRBP's 3.3%
Stability / SafetyABBV logoABBVBeta 0.28 vs SKYE's 2.13
DividendsPFE logoPFE6.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs ABBV's 3.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CRBP logoCRBP+64.8% vs SKYE's -51.8%
Efficiency (ROA)HALO logoHALO12.5% ROA vs SKYE's -119.9%, ROIC 73.4% vs -6.0%

SKYE vs CRBP vs ABBV vs HALO vs PFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SKYESkye Bioscience, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CRBPCorbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ABBVAbbVie Inc.
FY 2025
SKYRIZI
30.2%$17.6B
RINVOQ
14.3%$8.3B
H U M I R A
7.8%$4.5B
Botox Therapeutic
6.5%$3.8B
Vraylar
6.2%$3.6B
Imbruvica
4.9%$2.9B
VENCLEXTA
4.8%$2.8B
Other (14)
25.3%$14.7B
HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Royalty
53.6%$868M
Product
23.3%$376M
Collaborative Agreements
9.4%$152M
Bulk rHuPH20
8.2%$133M
Sales-based milestone
4.3%$70M
Upfront Fees
1.1%$18M
PFEPfizer Inc.
FY 2025
Biopharma Segment
97.8%$61.2B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
2.2%$1.4B

SKYE vs CRBP vs ABBV vs HALO vs PFE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHALOLAGGINGABBV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HALO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

PFE and CRBP operate at a comparable scale, with $63.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. HALO is the more profitable business, keeping 22.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ABBV's 6.9%. On growth, HALO holds the edge at +51.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSKYE logoSKYESkye Bioscience, …CRBP logoCRBPCorbus Pharmaceut…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$61.2B$1.4B$63.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$58M-$84M$24.5B$945M$21.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$56M-$79M$4.2B$317M$7.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$9.2B-$64M$18.7B$645M$9.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.2%+81.9%+69.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.7%+58.4%+23.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.9%+22.7%+11.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+30.6%+46.2%+15.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.0%+51.6%+5.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-50.0%-60.3%+57.4%-2.1%-9.5%
HALO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 18.9x trailing earnings, PFE trades at a 78% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HALO's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABBV's 14.9x.

MetricSKYE logoSKYESkye Bioscience, …CRBP logoCRBPCorbus Pharmaceut…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.
Market CapShares × price$30M$137M$356.5B$7.6B$146.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$25M$111M$420.3B$7.4B$212.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.61x-1.86x85.04x25.05x18.88x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.17x7.96x8.66x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.09x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.89x8.20x10.44x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.83x5.41x2.33x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.71x0.99x162.76x1.68x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF20.01x11.72x16.09x
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HALO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-144 for SKYE. CRBP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFE's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFE scores 7/9 vs SKYE's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSKYE logoSKYESkye Bioscience, …CRBP logoCRBPCorbus Pharmaceut…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-143.6%-65.8%+62.1%+6.5%+8.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-119.9%-57.9%+3.1%+12.5%+3.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-6.0%-51.4%+23.9%+73.4%+7.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-131.4%-58.5%+21.5%+38.2%+9.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–912657
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.01x0.78x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$6M-$27M$63.8B-$134M$66.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$28M$5.2B$134M$1.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$273,646$2M$69.1B$0$67.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.28x46.08x4.02x
HALO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $19,956 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $388 for SKYE. Over the past 12 months, CRBP leads with a +64.8% total return vs SKYE's -51.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HALO at 28.4% vs SKYE's -38.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSKYE logoSKYESkye Bioscience, …CRBP logoCRBPCorbus Pharmaceut…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-1.7%+39.3%-10.6%-8.8%+5.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-51.8%+64.8%+12.2%-5.3%+21.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-77.0%+8.2%+49.7%+111.8%-19.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.1%-76.7%+99.6%+39.1%-14.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.4%-85.3%+293.8%+559.7%+28.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-38.7%+2.7%+14.4%+28.4%-6.9%
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ABBV and PFE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKYE's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFE currently trades 89.3% from its 52-week high vs SKYE's 15.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSKYE logoSKYESkye Bioscience, …CRBP logoCRBPCorbus Pharmaceut…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.13x1.22x0.28x0.51x0.49x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.75$20.56$244.81$82.22$28.75
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.57$6.25$176.57$47.50$21.97
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+15.0%+53.3%+82.3%+78.0%+89.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.963.043.947.743.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded568K258K5.8M1.4M33.3M
Evenly matched — ABBV and PFE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CRBP as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", HALO as "Buy", PFE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 366.6% upside for CRBP (target: $51) vs 6.7% for PFE (target: $27). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.69% vs ABBV's 3.26%.

MetricSKYE logoSKYESkye Bioscience, …CRBP logoCRBPCorbus Pharmaceut…ABBV logoABBVAbbVie Inc.HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…PFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$51.14$256.69$75.60$27.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts14412739
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.3%+6.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1315
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$6.57$1.72
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.3%+4.5%0.0%
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HALO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PFE leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SKYE vs CRBP vs ABBV vs HALO vs PFE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SKYE or CRBP or ABBV or HALO or PFE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the stronger pick with 37. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Pfizer Inc. (PFE) offers the better valuation at 18. 9x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. (CRBP) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SKYE or CRBP or ABBV or HALO or PFE?

On trailing P/E, Pfizer Inc.

(PFE) is the cheapest at 18. 9x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 0x. On forward P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SKYE or CRBP or ABBV or HALO or PFE?

Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) delivered a total return of +99. 6%, compared to -96. 1% for Skye Bioscience, Inc. (SKYE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HALO returned +559. 7% versus SKYE's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SKYE or CRBP or ABBV or HALO or PFE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Skye Bioscience, Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning SKYE is approximately 671% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. (CRBP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 78% for Pfizer Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SKYE or CRBP or ABBV or HALO or PFE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is pulling ahead at 37. 6% versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AbbVie Inc. grew EPS -0. 8% year-over-year, compared to -93. 2% for Skye Bioscience, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HALO leads at 28. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SKYE or CRBP or ABBV or HALO or PFE?

Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus 0. 0% for Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus 0. 0% for CRBP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HALO leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SKYE or CRBP or ABBV or HALO or PFE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for AbbVie Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRBP: 366. 6% to $51. 14.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SKYE or CRBP or ABBV or HALO or PFE?

In this comparison, PFE (6.

7% yield), ABBV (3. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SKYE, CRBP, HALO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SKYE or CRBP or ABBV or HALO or PFE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.

(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 3. 3% yield, +293. 8% 10Y return). Skye Bioscience, Inc. (SKYE) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +293. 8%, SKYE: -99. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SKYE and CRBP and ABBV and HALO and PFE?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SKYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. ABBV, PFE pay a dividend while SKYE, CRBP, HALO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SKYE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CRBP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ABBV

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HALO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 25%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PFE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.