Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SKYH vs FLYW vs RAMP vs FTAI vs AVAV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Software - Infrastructure
Rental & Leasing Services
Aerospace & Defense
SKYH vs FLYW vs RAMP vs FTAI vs AVAV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Information Technology Services | Software - Infrastructure | Rental & Leasing Services | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $419M | $2.12B | $1.90B | $27.96B | $8.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24M | $188.60B | $796M | $2.84B | $1.61B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $12.54B | $69M | $537M | $-224M |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 0.2% | 70.4% | 31.0% | 21.8% |
| Operating Margin | -87.5% | 5.7% | 7.1% | 28.2% | -8.3% |
| Forward P/E | 110.7x | 49.5x | 13.1x | 37.1x | 58.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 | $36M | $3.45B | $64M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $330M | $413M | $300M | $41M |
SKYH vs FLYW vs RAMP vs FTAI vs AVAV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sky Harbour Group C… (SKYH) | 100 | 99.2 | -0.8% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 51.6 | -48.4% |
| LiveRamp Holdings, … (RAMP) | 100 | 60.0 | -40.0% |
| FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI) | 100 | 1091.5 | +991.5% |
| AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) | 100 | 153.4 | +53.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKYH vs FLYW vs RAMP vs FTAI vs AVAV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKYH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 86.6%, EPS growth 105.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 146.2%
- 86.6% revenue growth vs RAMP's 13.0%
FLYW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RAMP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.97
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 2.65x
- Beta 0.97, current ratio 2.65x
- Lower P/E (13.1x vs 58.4x)
FTAI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 33.3% 10Y total return vs AVAV's 498.3%
- 18.9% margin vs SKYH's -17.8%
- 0.5% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +149.0% vs SKYH's -11.1%
Among these 5 stocks, AVAV doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 86.6% revenue growth vs RAMP's 13.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.1x vs 58.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.9% margin vs SKYH's -17.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs FTAI's 1.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +149.0% vs SKYH's -11.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs AVAV's -5.0%, ROIC 16.8% vs 3.6% |
SKYH vs FLYW vs RAMP vs FTAI vs AVAV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SKYH vs FLYW vs RAMP vs FTAI vs AVAV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FTAI leads in 3 of 6 categories
RAMP leads 1 • SKYH leads 0 • FLYW leads 0 • AVAV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FLYW and RAMP and FTAI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 7817.7x SKYH's $24M. FTAI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKYH's -17.8%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24M | $188.6B | $796M | $2.8B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $10.8B | $71M | $1.0B | $82M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $12.5B | $69M | $537M | -$224M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$99M | -$15.8B | $169M | -$1.4B | -$183M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +0.2% | +70.4% | +31.0% | +21.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -87.5% | +5.7% | +7.1% | +28.2% | -8.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.8% | +6.6% | +8.6% | +18.9% | -13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -8.4% | +21.3% | -48.8% | -11.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.2% | +1408.6% | +8.6% | +65.5% | +143.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.5% | +4.0% | +2.6% | +48.3% | -51.5% |
Valuation Metrics
RAMP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 59.2x trailing earnings, FTAI trades at a 63% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FTAI's 31.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AVAV's 103.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $419M | $2.1B | $1.9B | $28.0B | $8.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $398M | $1.8B | $1.5B | $31.1B | $8.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 110.67x | 161.18x | -2491.74x | 59.25x | 108.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 49.50x | 13.14x | 37.12x | 58.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 50.41x | 47.80x | 67.50x | 31.24x | 102.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.21x | 3.40x | 2.55x | 11.15x | 10.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.50x | 2.71x | 2.14x | 84.69x | 5.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.41x | 12.31x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTAI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTAI delivers a 181.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $181 in annual profit, vs $-6 for AVAV. RAMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTAI's 10.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLYW scores 6/9 vs AVAV's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +5.9% | +7.1% | +181.4% | -6.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.8% | +4.3% | +5.7% | +12.4% | -5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.4% | +2.1% | +0.7% | +16.8% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | +1.3% | +0.5% | +20.1% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.04x | 10.32x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | -$330M | -$377M | $3.1B | $23M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $330M | $413M | $300M | $41M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 | $36M | $3.4B | $64M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.43x | 1.84x | 31.98x | 3.46x | -5.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FTAI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FTAI five years ago would be worth $114,680 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,051 for FLYW. Over the past 12 months, FTAI leads with a +149.0% total return vs SKYH's -11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTAI at 115.8% vs FLYW's -15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.8% | +27.6% | +10.0% | +29.8% | -34.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.1% | +62.7% | +11.8% | +149.0% | +5.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.4% | -40.1% | +26.8% | +905.4% | +63.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.0% | -49.5% | -39.2% | +1046.8% | +53.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.1% | -49.5% | +31.6% | +3325.4% | +498.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.6% | -15.7% | +8.2% | +115.8% | +17.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLYW and RAMP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RAMP is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTAI's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs AVAV's 40.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 1.32x | 0.97x | 1.79x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.67 | $18.05 | $35.20 | $323.51 | $417.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.22 | $9.79 | $21.71 | $105.59 | $155.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.6% | +98.2% | +85.7% | +84.2% | +40.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 83.0 | 56.1 | 63.7 | 39.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 131K | 1.9M | 651K | 1.7M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
FTAI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SKYH as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy", RAMP as "Buy", FTAI as "Buy", AVAV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 104.3% upside for AVAV (target: $344) vs -1.3% for FLYW (target: $18). FTAI is the only dividend payer here at 0.45% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $17.50 | $44.00 | $297.67 | $343.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 19 | 12 | 18 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.23 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.7% | +5.3% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
FTAI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). RAMP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SKYH vs FLYW vs RAMP vs FTAI vs AVAV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKYH or FLYW or RAMP or FTAI or AVAV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) is the stronger pick with 86.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 0% for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP). FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI) offers the better valuation at 59. 2x trailing P/E (37. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKYH or FLYW or RAMP or FTAI or AVAV?
On trailing P/E, FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) is the cheapest at 59. 2x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKYH or FLYW or RAMP or FTAI or AVAV?
Over the past 5 years, FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) delivered a total return of +1047%, compared to -49. 5% for Flywire Corporation (FLYW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FTAI returned +33. 3% versus FLYW's -49. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKYH or FLYW or RAMP or FTAI or AVAV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
(RAMP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus FTAI Aviation Ltd. 's 1. 79β — meaning FTAI is approximately 85% more volatile than RAMP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 10% for FTAI Aviation Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKYH or FLYW or RAMP or FTAI or AVAV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) is pulling ahead at 86.
6% versus 13. 0% for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FTAI Aviation Ltd. grew EPS 1538% year-over-year, compared to -107. 1% for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKYH leads at 146. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKYH or FLYW or RAMP or FTAI or AVAV?
Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) is the more profitable company, earning 68.
3% net margin versus -0. 1% for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 68. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTAI leads at 30. 7% versus 0. 7% for RAMP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RAMP leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKYH or FLYW or RAMP or FTAI or AVAV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
(RAMP) trades at 13. 1x forward P/E versus 58. 4x for AeroVironment, Inc. — 45. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVAV: 104. 3% to $343. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKYH or FLYW or RAMP or FTAI or AVAV?
In this comparison, FTAI (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. SKYH, FLYW, RAMP, AVAV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKYH or FLYW or RAMP or FTAI or AVAV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
(RAMP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97)). FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RAMP: +31. 6%, FTAI: +33. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKYH and FLYW and RAMP and FTAI and AVAV?
These companies operate in different sectors (SKYH (Industrials) and FLYW (Technology) and RAMP (Technology) and FTAI (Industrials) and AVAV (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SKYH is a small-cap high-growth stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; RAMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FTAI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AVAV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.