Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SKYH vs FTAI vs AL vs FLYW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
Rental & Leasing Services
Information Technology Services
SKYH vs FTAI vs AL vs FLYW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $419M | $27.96B | $7.26B | $2.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24M | $2.84B | $3.02B | $188.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $537M | $1.09B | $12.54B |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 31.0% | 38.4% | 0.2% |
| Operating Margin | -87.5% | 28.2% | 29.5% | 5.7% |
| Forward P/E | 110.7x | 37.1x | 12.8x | 49.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $3.45B | $19.73B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $300M | $466M | $330M |
SKYH vs FTAI vs AL vs FLYW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sky Harbour Group C… (SKYH) | 100 | 99.2 | -0.8% |
| FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI) | 100 | 1091.5 | +991.5% |
| Air Lease Corporati… (AL) | 100 | 138.0 | +38.0% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 51.6 | -48.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKYH vs FTAI vs AL vs FLYW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKYH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 86.6% revenue growth vs AL's 10.3%
FTAI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 43.2%, EPS growth 15.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 51.4%
- 33.3% 10Y total return vs AL's 129.9%
- +149.0% vs SKYH's -11.1%
- 12.4% ROA vs SKYH's -0.8%, ROIC 16.8% vs 0.4%
AL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.30, yield 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, current ratio 0.93x
- Beta 0.30, yield 1.3%, current ratio 0.93x
- Lower P/E (12.8x vs 49.5x)
FLYW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 86.6% revenue growth vs AL's 10.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.8x vs 49.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.1% margin vs SKYH's -17.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs FTAI's 1.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs FTAI's 0.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +149.0% vs SKYH's -11.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs SKYH's -0.8%, ROIC 16.8% vs 0.4% |
SKYH vs FTAI vs AL vs FLYW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SKYH vs FTAI vs AL vs FLYW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AL leads in 3 of 6 categories
FTAI leads 2 • SKYH leads 0 • FLYW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AL and FLYW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 7817.7x SKYH's $24M. AL is the more profitable business, keeping 36.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKYH's -17.8%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24M | $2.8B | $3.0B | $188.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $1.0B | $2.1B | $10.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $537M | $1.1B | $12.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$99M | -$1.4B | -$1.7B | -$15.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +31.0% | +38.4% | +0.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -87.5% | +28.2% | +29.5% | +5.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.8% | +18.9% | +36.1% | +6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -48.8% | -57.4% | -8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.2% | +65.5% | +15.1% | +1408.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.5% | +48.3% | +81.9% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.0x trailing earnings, AL trades at a 96% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FTAI's 31.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKYH's 50.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $419M | $28.0B | $7.3B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $398M | $31.1B | $6.8B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 110.67x | 59.25x | 7.00x | 161.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 37.12x | 12.76x | 49.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.43x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 50.41x | 31.24x | — | 47.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.21x | 11.15x | 2.41x | 3.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.50x | 84.69x | 0.86x | 2.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 21.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTAI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTAI delivers a 181.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $181 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SKYH. AL carries lower financial leverage with a 2.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTAI's 10.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AL scores 8/9 vs SKYH's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +181.4% | +13.2% | +5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.8% | +12.4% | +3.3% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.4% | +16.8% | +4.2% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | +20.1% | +5.0% | +1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 10.32x | 2.33x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | $3.1B | $19.3B | -$330M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $300M | $466M | $330M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $3.4B | $19.7B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.43x | 3.46x | 6.32x | 1.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FTAI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FTAI five years ago would be worth $114,680 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,051 for FLYW. Over the past 12 months, FTAI leads with a +149.0% total return vs SKYH's -11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTAI at 115.8% vs FLYW's -15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.8% | +29.8% | +1.7% | +27.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.1% | +149.0% | +22.5% | +62.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.4% | +905.4% | +79.9% | -40.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.0% | +1046.8% | +56.3% | -49.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.1% | +3325.4% | +129.9% | -49.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.6% | +115.8% | +21.6% | -15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
AL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AL is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTAI's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs SKYH's 78.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 1.79x | 0.30x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.67 | $323.51 | $65.00 | $18.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.22 | $105.59 | $51.66 | $9.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.6% | +84.2% | +100.0% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 63.7 | 66.3 | 83.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 131K | 1.7M | 2.5M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
AL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SKYH as "Buy", FTAI as "Buy", AL as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.6% upside for SKYH (target: $15) vs -1.3% for FLYW (target: $18). For income investors, AL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.35% vs FTAI's 0.45%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $297.67 | $65.00 | $17.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 18 | 20 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.5% | +1.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 13 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.23 | $0.87 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +3.7% |
AL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). FTAI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
SKYH vs FTAI vs AL vs FLYW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKYH or FTAI or AL or FLYW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) is the stronger pick with 86.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 3% for Air Lease Corporation (AL). Air Lease Corporation (AL) offers the better valuation at 7. 0x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKYH or FTAI or AL or FLYW?
On trailing P/E, Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the cheapest at 7.
0x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, Air Lease Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKYH or FTAI or AL or FLYW?
Over the past 5 years, FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) delivered a total return of +1047%, compared to -49. 5% for Flywire Corporation (FLYW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FTAI returned +33. 3% versus FLYW's -49. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKYH or FTAI or AL or FLYW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
30β versus FTAI Aviation Ltd. 's 1. 79β — meaning FTAI is approximately 502% more volatile than AL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Air Lease Corporation (AL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 10% for FTAI Aviation Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKYH or FTAI or AL or FLYW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) is pulling ahead at 86.
6% versus 10. 3% for Air Lease Corporation (AL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FTAI Aviation Ltd. grew EPS 1538% year-over-year, compared to 105. 1% for Sky Harbour Group Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKYH leads at 146. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKYH or FTAI or AL or FLYW?
Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) is the more profitable company, earning 68.
3% net margin versus 2. 2% for Flywire Corporation — meaning it keeps 68. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AL leads at 50. 5% versus 1. 8% for FLYW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLYW leads at 61. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKYH or FTAI or AL or FLYW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Air Lease Corporation (AL) trades at 12.
8x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 36. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKYH: 45. 6% to $14. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKYH or FTAI or AL or FLYW?
In this comparison, AL (1.
3% yield), FTAI (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. SKYH, FLYW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKYH or FTAI or AL or FLYW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
30), 1. 3% yield, +129. 9% 10Y return). FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AL: +129. 9%, FTAI: +33. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKYH and FTAI and AL and FLYW?
These companies operate in different sectors (SKYH (Industrials) and FTAI (Industrials) and AL (Industrials) and FLYW (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SKYH is a small-cap high-growth stock; FTAI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AL is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock. AL pays a dividend while SKYH, FTAI, FLYW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.