Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SKYH vs RAMP vs FLYW vs CDLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
Advertising Agencies
SKYH vs RAMP vs FLYW vs CDLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $419M | $1.90B | $2.12B | $43M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24M | $796M | $188.60B | $206M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $69M | $12.54B | $-95M |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 70.4% | 0.2% | 38.9% |
| Operating Margin | -87.5% | 7.1% | 5.7% | -22.8% |
| Forward P/E | 110.7x | 13.1x | 49.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $36M | $0.00 | $215M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $413M | $330M | $49M |
SKYH vs RAMP vs FLYW vs CDLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sky Harbour Group C… (SKYH) | 100 | 99.2 | -0.8% |
| LiveRamp Holdings, … (RAMP) | 100 | 60.0 | -40.0% |
| Flywire Corporation (FLYW) | 100 | 51.6 | -48.4% |
| Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX) | 100 | 0.7 | -99.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKYH vs RAMP vs FLYW vs CDLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKYH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 86.6%, EPS growth 105.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 146.2%
- 86.6% revenue growth vs CDLX's -16.2%
RAMP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.97
- 31.6% 10Y total return vs SKYH's -1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 2.65x
- Beta 0.97, current ratio 2.65x
FLYW is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +62.7% vs CDLX's -63.8%
CDLX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 86.6% revenue growth vs CDLX's -16.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.1x vs 49.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.6% margin vs CDLX's -46.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs CDLX's 3.18 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.7% vs CDLX's -63.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.7% ROA vs CDLX's -31.5%, ROIC 0.7% vs -18.3% |
SKYH vs RAMP vs FLYW vs CDLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SKYH vs RAMP vs FLYW vs CDLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RAMP leads in 2 of 6 categories
SKYH leads 1 • FLYW leads 0 • CDLX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RAMP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLYW is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.6B annually — 7817.7x SKYH's $24M. RAMP is the more profitable business, keeping 8.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CDLX's -46.0%. On growth, FLYW holds the edge at +1408.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24M | $796M | $188.6B | $206M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $71M | $10.8B | -$23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $69M | $12.5B | -$95M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$99M | $169M | -$15.8B | $6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +70.4% | +0.2% | +38.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -87.5% | +7.1% | +5.7% | -22.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.8% | +8.6% | +6.6% | -46.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | +21.3% | -8.4% | +2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.2% | +8.6% | +1408.6% | -44.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.5% | +2.6% | +4.0% | +3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
RAMP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 110.7x trailing earnings, SKYH trades at a 31% valuation discount to FLYW's 161.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FLYW's 47.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RAMP's 67.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $419M | $1.9B | $2.1B | $43M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $398M | $1.5B | $1.8B | $210M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 110.67x | -2491.74x | 161.18x | -0.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.14x | 49.50x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 50.41x | 67.50x | 47.80x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.21x | 2.55x | 3.40x | 0.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.50x | 2.14x | 2.71x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.31x | 21.41x | 4.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — RAMP and FLYW each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RAMP delivers a 7.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-9 for CDLX. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLYW scores 6/9 vs SKYH's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +7.1% | +5.9% | -8.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.8% | +5.7% | +4.3% | -31.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.4% | +0.7% | +2.1% | -18.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | +0.5% | +1.3% | -20.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | -$377M | -$330M | $167M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $413M | $330M | $49M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $36M | $0 | $215M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.43x | 31.98x | 1.84x | -14.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SKYH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SKYH five years ago would be worth $9,901 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $78 for CDLX. Over the past 12 months, FLYW leads with a +62.7% total return vs CDLX's -63.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKYH at 22.6% vs CDLX's -48.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.8% | +10.0% | +27.6% | -30.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.1% | +11.8% | +62.7% | -63.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.4% | +26.8% | -40.1% | -86.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.0% | -39.2% | -49.5% | -99.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.1% | +31.6% | -49.5% | -94.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.6% | +8.2% | -15.7% | -48.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RAMP and FLYW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RAMP is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDLX's 3.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLYW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs CDLX's 23.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 0.97x | 1.32x | 3.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.67 | $35.20 | $18.05 | $3.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.22 | $21.71 | $9.79 | $0.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.6% | +85.7% | +98.2% | +23.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 56.1 | 83.0 | 36.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 131K | 651K | 1.9M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SKYH as "Buy", RAMP as "Buy", FLYW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.9% upside for RAMP (target: $44) vs -1.3% for FLYW (target: $18).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $44.00 | $17.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 12 | 19 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.3% | +3.7% | 0.0% |
RAMP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SKYH leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SKYH vs RAMP vs FLYW vs CDLX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKYH or RAMP or FLYW or CDLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) is the stronger pick with 86.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) offers the better valuation at 110. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKYH or RAMP or FLYW or CDLX?
On trailing P/E, Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) is the cheapest at 110.
7x versus Flywire Corporation at 161. 2x. On forward P/E, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKYH or RAMP or FLYW or CDLX?
Over the past 5 years, Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) delivered a total return of -1.
0%, compared to -99. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RAMP returned +31. 6% versus CDLX's -94. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKYH or RAMP or FLYW or CDLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
(RAMP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Cardlytics, Inc. 's 3. 18β — meaning CDLX is approximately 230% more volatile than RAMP relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — SKYH or RAMP or FLYW or CDLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) is pulling ahead at 86.
6% versus -16. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flywire Corporation grew EPS 391. 1% year-over-year, compared to -107. 1% for LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKYH leads at 146. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKYH or RAMP or FLYW or CDLX?
Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) is the more profitable company, earning 68.
3% net margin versus -44. 4% for Cardlytics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 68. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SKYH leads at 5. 8% versus -20. 2% for CDLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RAMP leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKYH or RAMP or FLYW or CDLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
(RAMP) trades at 13. 1x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Flywire Corporation — 36. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RAMP: 45. 9% to $44. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKYH or RAMP or FLYW or CDLX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SKYH or RAMP or FLYW or CDLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
(RAMP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97)). Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX) carries a higher beta of 3. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RAMP: +31. 6%, CDLX: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKYH and RAMP and FLYW and CDLX?
These companies operate in different sectors (SKYH (Industrials) and RAMP (Technology) and FLYW (Technology) and CDLX (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SKYH is a small-cap high-growth stock; RAMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLYW is a small-cap high-growth stock; CDLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.