Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SKYQ vs CLMT vs PARR vs CVI vs DKL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SKYQ
Sky Quarry Inc.

Oil & Gas Integrated

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$86M
5Y Perf.-78.8%
CLMT
Calumet, Inc.

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.78B
5Y Perf.+50.4%
PARR
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.

Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.18B
5Y Perf.+316.6%
CVI
CVR Energy, Inc.

Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.37B
5Y Perf.+111.0%
DKL
Delek Logistics Partners, LP

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.71B
5Y Perf.+32.4%

SKYQ vs CLMT vs PARR vs CVI vs DKL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SKYQ logoSKYQ
CLMT logoCLMT
PARR logoPARR
CVI logoCVI
DKL logoDKL
IndustryOil & Gas IntegratedOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Refining & MarketingOil & Gas Refining & MarketingOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$86M$2.78B$3.18B$3.37B$2.71B
Revenue (TTM)$16M$4.17B$7.54B$7.50B$1.06B
Net Income (TTM)$-14M$-189M$454M$-42M$170M
Gross Margin-24.9%5.7%19.5%1.4%19.2%
Operating Margin-65.8%-0.2%8.2%-0.6%16.5%
Forward P/E419.3x5.7x36.3x14.6x
Total Debt$11M$382M$1.39B$1.83B$35M
Cash & Equiv.$385K$125M$164M$511M$11M

SKYQ vs CLMT vs PARR vs CVI vs DKLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SKYQ
CLMT
PARR
CVI
DKL
StockOct 24May 26Return
Sky Quarry Inc. (SKYQ)10021.3-78.8%
Calumet, Inc. (CLMT)100150.4+50.4%
Par Pacific Holding… (PARR)100416.6+316.6%
CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI)100211.0+111.0%
Delek Logistics Par… (DKL)100132.4+32.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SKYQ vs CLMT vs PARR vs CVI vs DKL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PARR and DKL are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Delek Logistics Partners, LP is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. CVI also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SKYQ
Sky Quarry Inc.
The Energy Pick

SKYQ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: energy exposure
CLMT
Calumet, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CLMT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 7.6% 10Y total return vs PARR's 267.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
PARR
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
The Value Play

PARR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and momentum.

  • Lower P/E (5.7x vs 14.6x)
  • +267.2% vs SKYQ's -35.2%
  • 11.2% ROA vs SKYQ's -64.9%, ROIC 15.1% vs -25.1%
Best for: value and momentum
CVI
CVR Energy, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CVI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.05, current ratio 1.79x
  • Beta 0.05, current ratio 1.79x
  • Beta 0.05 vs SKYQ's 1.29
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
DKL
Delek Logistics Partners, LP
The Income Pick

DKL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 8.7%
  • Rev growth 7.7%, EPS growth 10.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.7%
  • 7.7% revenue growth vs SKYQ's -53.9%
  • 16.0% margin vs SKYQ's -82.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthDKL logoDKL7.7% revenue growth vs SKYQ's -53.9%
ValuePARR logoPARRLower P/E (5.7x vs 14.6x)
Quality / MarginsDKL logoDKL16.0% margin vs SKYQ's -82.5%
Stability / SafetyCVI logoCVIBeta 0.05 vs SKYQ's 1.29
DividendsDKL logoDKL8.7% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PARR logoPARR+267.2% vs SKYQ's -35.2%
Efficiency (ROA)PARR logoPARR11.2% ROA vs SKYQ's -64.9%, ROIC 15.1% vs -25.1%

SKYQ vs CLMT vs PARR vs CVI vs DKL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SKYQSky Quarry Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CLMTCalumet, Inc.
FY 2025
Specialty Products and Solutions
63.8%$2.7B
Montana/Renewables
28.7%$1.2B
Performance Brands
7.5%$312M
PARRPar Pacific Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Fuel Revenue
95.8%$7.2B
Other Revenue
4.2%$311M
CVICVR Energy, Inc.
FY 2025
Petroleum Segment
93.7%$6.4B
Nitrogen Fertilizer Segment
8.8%$606M
Renewables Segment
-2.5%$-171,000,000
DKLDelek Logistics Partners, LP
FY 2023
Wholesale Marketing and Terminalling
49.6%$506M
Gathering And Processing
36.4%$371M
Storage And Transportation
14.1%$144M

SKYQ vs CLMT vs PARR vs CVI vs DKL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPARRLAGGINGCVI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DKL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

PARR is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 459.9x SKYQ's $16M. DKL is the more profitable business, keeping 16.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKYQ's -82.5%. On growth, CVI holds the edge at +20.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSKYQ logoSKYQSky Quarry Inc.CLMT logoCLMTCalumet, Inc.PARR logoPARRPar Pacific Holdi…CVI logoCVICVR Energy, Inc.DKL logoDKLDelek Logistics P…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$16M$4.2B$7.5B$7.5B$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$10M$33M$760M$370M$310M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$14M-$189M$454M-$42M$170M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$5M$85M$282M$69M$112M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-24.9%+5.7%+19.5%+1.4%+19.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-65.8%-0.2%+8.2%-0.6%+16.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-82.5%-4.5%+6.0%-0.6%+16.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-30.0%+2.0%+3.7%+0.9%+10.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-72.4%+3.6%+4.5%+20.3%+19.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+139.1%-94.7%+2.9%-56.6%-17.8%
DKL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PARR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 9.0x trailing earnings, PARR trades at a 93% valuation discount to CVI's 124.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PARR's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLMT's 15.0x.

MetricSKYQ logoSKYQSky Quarry Inc.CLMT logoCLMTCalumet, Inc.PARR logoPARRPar Pacific Holdi…CVI logoCVICVR Energy, Inc.DKL logoDKLDelek Logistics P…
Market CapShares × price$86M$2.8B$3.2B$3.4B$2.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$97M$3.0B$4.4B$4.7B$2.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-5.08x-82.26x8.99x124.26x15.47x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.419.35x5.66x36.33x14.60x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.98x6.46x8.23x8.81x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.70x0.67x0.43x0.47x2.68x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.47x2.11x3.75x447.14x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF49.18x10.74x
PARR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PARR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

DKL delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-2 for SKYQ. PARR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.90x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKL's 5.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CVI scores 8/9 vs SKYQ's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSKYQ logoSKYQSky Quarry Inc.CLMT logoCLMTCalumet, Inc.PARR logoPARRPar Pacific Holdi…CVI logoCVICVR Energy, Inc.DKL logoDKLDelek Logistics P…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.5%+32.2%-5.0%+19.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-64.9%-6.9%+11.2%-1.1%+6.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-25.1%+5.0%+15.1%+6.2%+14.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-50.4%+2.9%+18.9%+5.3%+8.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–927784
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.95x0.90x2.04x5.75x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$11M$257M$1.2B$1.3B$24M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$385,116$125M$164M$511M$11M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$11M$382M$1.4B$1.8B$35M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.35x1.81x14.33x-0.41x1.66x
PARR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

PARR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CLMT five years ago would be worth $57,388 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,189 for SKYQ. Over the past 12 months, PARR leads with a +267.2% total return vs SKYQ's -35.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PARR at 45.4% vs SKYQ's -50.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSKYQ logoSKYQSky Quarry Inc.CLMT logoCLMTCalumet, Inc.PARR logoPARRPar Pacific Holdi…CVI logoCVICVR Energy, Inc.DKL logoDKLDelek Logistics P…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+13.7%+64.1%+79.7%+34.7%+13.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-35.2%+170.3%+267.2%+61.1%+47.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.1%+84.2%+207.7%+59.5%+45.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.1%+473.9%+360.4%+169.9%+85.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.1%+762.4%+267.4%+259.4%+207.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-50.8%+22.6%+45.4%+16.8%+13.3%
PARR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

PARR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

PARR is the less volatile stock with a -0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKYQ's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PARR currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs SKYQ's 20.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSKYQ logoSKYQSky Quarry Inc.CLMT logoCLMTCalumet, Inc.PARR logoPARRPar Pacific Holdi…CVI logoCVICVR Energy, Inc.DKL logoDKLDelek Logistics P…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.29x0.28x-0.11x0.05x0.34x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.45$36.94$70.39$41.67$55.89
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.34$11.38$16.86$19.63$37.50
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+20.1%+86.8%+91.4%+80.5%+91.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.259.649.452.049.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded10.0M1.3M1.5M1.2M63K
PARR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

DKL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CLMT as "Hold", PARR as "Buy", CVI as "Hold", DKL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.7% upside for DKL (target: $56) vs -10.6% for CVI (target: $30). DKL is the only dividend payer here at 8.71% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSKYQ logoSKYQSky Quarry Inc.CLMT logoCLMTCalumet, Inc.PARR logoPARRPar Pacific Holdi…CVI logoCVICVR Energy, Inc.DKL logoDKLDelek Logistics P…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$31.00$61.60$30.00$56.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts23171810
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+8.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0105
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$4.45
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.9%0.0%+0.4%
DKL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

PARR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). DKL leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallPar Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SKYQ vs CLMT vs PARR vs CVI vs DKL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SKYQ or CLMT or PARR or CVI or DKL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is the stronger pick with 7.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -53. 9% for Sky Quarry Inc. (SKYQ). Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (5. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SKYQ or CLMT or PARR or CVI or DKL?

On trailing P/E, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.

(PARR) is the cheapest at 9. 0x versus CVR Energy, Inc. at 124. 3x. On forward P/E, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SKYQ or CLMT or PARR or CVI or DKL?

Over the past 5 years, Calumet, Inc.

(CLMT) delivered a total return of +473. 9%, compared to -88. 1% for Sky Quarry Inc. (SKYQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLMT returned +762. 4% versus SKYQ's -88. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SKYQ or CLMT or PARR or CVI or DKL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.

(PARR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 11β versus Sky Quarry Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning SKYQ is approximately -1286% more volatile than PARR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 90% versus 6% for Delek Logistics Partners, LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SKYQ or CLMT or PARR or CVI or DKL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is pulling ahead at 7.

7% versus -53. 9% for Sky Quarry Inc. (SKYQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 1314% year-over-year, compared to -234. 8% for Sky Quarry Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PARR leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SKYQ or CLMT or PARR or CVI or DKL?

Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is the more profitable company, earning 17.

4% net margin versus -63. 0% for Sky Quarry Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DKL leads at 18. 0% versus -32. 2% for SKYQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DKL leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SKYQ or CLMT or PARR or CVI or DKL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.

(PARR) trades at 5. 7x forward P/E versus 419. 3x for Calumet, Inc. — 413. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKL: 9. 7% to $56. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SKYQ or CLMT or PARR or CVI or DKL?

In this comparison, DKL (8.

7% yield) pays a dividend. SKYQ, CLMT, PARR, CVI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SKYQ or CLMT or PARR or CVI or DKL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Delek Logistics Partners, LP (DKL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

34), 8. 7% yield, +207. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DKL: +207. 4%, SKYQ: -88. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SKYQ and CLMT and PARR and CVI and DKL?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SKYQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLMT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PARR is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKL is a small-cap deep-value stock. DKL pays a dividend while SKYQ, CLMT, PARR, CVI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SKYQ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLMT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PARR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CVI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DKL

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SKYQ and CLMT and PARR and CVI and DKL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SKYQ: -72.4% · CLMT: 3.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.