Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) vs United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SKYT | 29.2% revenue growth vs UMC's 2.3% |
| Value | SKYT | Lower P/E (12.1x vs 17.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | SKYT | 26.9% net margin vs UMC's 20.5% |
| Stability / Safety | UMC | Beta 0.75 vs SKYT's 2.28 |
| Dividends | UMC | 4.4% yield; SKYT pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SKYT | +215.8% vs UMC's +69.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SKYT | 16.2% ROA vs UMC's 8.4%, ROIC -1.3% vs 9.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
SkyWater Technology is a specialized semiconductor foundry that provides custom development and manufacturing services for analog, mixed-signal, and specialty chips. It generates revenue primarily from engineering services and wafer manufacturing—roughly 60% from manufacturing and 40% from development services—serving aerospace, defense, automotive, and IoT markets. Its key advantage is being the only U.S.-owned and Department of Defense-accredited pure-play semiconductor foundry, offering trusted domestic manufacturing for sensitive applications.
United Microelectronics Corporation is a pure-play semiconductor wafer foundry that manufactures integrated circuits for other companies rather than designing its own chips. It generates revenue primarily from wafer fabrication services — accounting for the vast majority of sales — with additional income from mask tooling, design support, and testing services. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized manufacturing expertise in mature and specialty process technologies — particularly in areas like RFSOI, embedded memory, and high-voltage processes — where it maintains strong customer relationships and technical leadership.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
UMC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SKYT leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
UMC is the larger business by revenue, generating $238.8B annually — 540.1x SKYT's $442M. SKYT is the more profitable business, keeping 26.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UMC's 20.5%. On growth, SKYT holds the edge at +126.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SKYTSkyWater Technolo… | UMCUnited Microelect… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $442M | $238.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21M | $105.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $119M | $48.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$53M | $50.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +29.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +19.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.9% | +20.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.0% | +21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +126.6% | -2.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.3% | +3.5% |
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, SKYT trades at a 38% valuation discount to UMC's 19.6x P/E.
| Metric | SKYTSkyWater Technolo… | UMCUnited Microelect… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $26.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $25.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.07x | 19.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.47x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.23x | 3.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.33x | 2.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SKYT delivers a 60.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $61 in annual profit, vs $13 for UMC. SKYT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UMC's 0.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UMC scores 5/9 vs SKYT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SKYTSkyWater Technolo… | UMCUnited Microelect… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +60.7% | +12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +16.2% | +8.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.3% | +9.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.9% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$17M | -$32.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $110.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $78.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 28.24x | 43.56x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in SKYT five years ago would be worth $16,607 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,699 for UMC. Over the past 12 months, SKYT leads with a +215.8% total return vs UMC's +69.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKYT at 30.9% vs UMC's 13.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SKYTSkyWater Technolo… | UMCUnited Microelect… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.3% | +33.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +215.8% | +69.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +124.4% | +47.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.1% | +27.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.1% | +542.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.9% | +13.8% |
Risk & Volatility
UMC is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKYT's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | SKYTSkyWater Technolo… | UMCUnited Microelect… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.28x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.27 | $12.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.67 | $5.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.2% | +82.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.3 | 52.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 9.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SKYT as "Hold" and UMC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.8% upside for SKYT (target: $35) vs -17.6% for UMC (target: $9). UMC is the only dividend payer here at 4.40% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SKYTSkyWater Technolo… | UMCUnited Microelect… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $8.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $14.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Apr 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkyWater Technology… (SKYT) | 100 | 176.55 | +76.6% |
| United Microelectro… (UMC) | 100 | 105.13 | +5.1% |
SkyWater Technology… (SKYT) returned +66% over 5 years vs United Microelectro… (UMC)'s +27%. A $10,000 investment in SKYT 5 years ago would be worth $16,607 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkyWater Technology… (SKYT) | $132M | $442M | +234.5% |
| United Microelectro… (UMC) | $147.9B | $237.6B | +60.6% |
United Microelectronics Corporation's revenue grew from $147.9B (2016) to $237.6B (2025) — a 5.4% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkyWater Technology… (SKYT) | -0.0% | 26.9% | +54765.4% |
| United Microelectro… (UMC) | 5.8% | 17.6% | +201.2% |
United Microelectronics Corporation's net margin went from 6% (2016) to 18% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Microelectro… (UMC) | 0.6 | 0.5 | -16.7% |
United Microelectronics Corporation has traded in a 0x–1x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~20x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkyWater Technology… (SKYT) | -0 | 2.44 | +143629.4% |
| United Microelectro… (UMC) | 3.35 | 16.7 | +398.5% |
United Microelectronics Corporation's EPS grew from $3.35 (2016) to $16.70 (2025) — a 20% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
SkyWater Technology, Inc. generated $-53M FCF in 2025 (+39% vs 2021). United Microelectronics Corporation generated $52B FCF in 2025 (+30% vs 2021).
SKYT vs UMC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKYT or UMC a better buy right now?
SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) offers the better valuation at 12.1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) a "Hold" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKYT or UMC?
On trailing P/E, SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) is the cheapest at 12.1x versus United Microelectronics Corporation at 19.6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKYT or UMC?
Over the past 5 years, SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) delivered a total return of +66.1%, compared to +27.0% for United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC). A $10,000 investment in SKYT five years ago would be worth approximately $17K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UMC returned +542.2% versus SKYT's +66.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKYT or UMC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.75β versus SkyWater Technology, Inc.'s 2.28β — meaning SKYT is approximately 202% more volatile than UMC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 21% for United Microelectronics Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — SKYT or UMC?
SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) is the more profitable company, earning 26.9% net margin versus 17.6% for United Microelectronics Corporation — meaning it keeps 26.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UMC leads at 18.5% versus -0.6% for SKYT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UMC leads at 29.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SKYT or UMC more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKYT: 18.8% to $35.00.
07Which pays a better dividend — SKYT or UMC?
In this comparison, UMC (4.4% yield) pays a dividend. SKYT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is SKYT or UMC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.75), 4.4% yield, +542.2% 10Y return). SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) carries a higher beta of 2.28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UMC: +542.2%, SKYT: +66.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SKYT and UMC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: SKYT is a small-cap deep-value stock; UMC is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. UMC pays a dividend while SKYT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.