Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SKYT vs UMC vs TSM vs GFS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SKYT
SkyWater Technology, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.63B
5Y Perf.-3.4%
UMC
United Microelectronics Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNYSE • TW
Market Cap$37.81B
5Y Perf.+47.6%
TSM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited

Semiconductors

TechnologyNYSE • TW
Market Cap$2.15T
5Y Perf.+264.2%
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$39.47B
5Y Perf.+45.5%

SKYT vs UMC vs TSM vs GFS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SKYT logoSKYT
UMC logoUMC
TSM logoTSM
GFS logoGFS
IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$1.63B$37.81B$2.15T$39.47B
Revenue (TTM)$442M$240.73B$3.82T$6.79B
Net Income (TTM)$119M$50.11B$1.72T$885M
Gross Margin20.0%29.6%59.9%25.2%
Operating Margin0.4%18.9%50.8%11.7%
Forward P/E13.5x22.2x0.8x38.5x
Total Debt$250M$59.78B$990.36B$1.64B
Cash & Equiv.$23M$110.66B$2.76T$1.81B

SKYT vs UMC vs TSM vs GFSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SKYT
UMC
TSM
GFS
StockOct 21May 26Return
SkyWater Technology… (SKYT)10096.6-3.4%
United Microelectro… (UMC)100147.6+47.6%
Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM)100364.2+264.2%
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS)100145.5+45.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SKYT vs UMC vs TSM vs GFS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TSM leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. SkyWater Technology, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. UMC also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SKYT
SkyWater Technology, Inc.
The Growth Play

SKYT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 29.2%, EPS growth 18.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.6%
  • +356.0% vs GFS's +101.0%
  • 21.8% ROA vs GFS's 5.3%, ROIC -0.3% vs 5.3%
Best for: growth exposure
UMC
United Microelectronics Corporation
The Income Pick

UMC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 3.0%
  • Beta 0.90, yield 3.0%, current ratio 2.34x
  • Beta 0.90 vs SKYT's 2.67, lower leverage
  • 3.0% yield, vs TSM's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
TSM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
The Long-Run Compounder

TSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 17.4% 10Y total return vs UMC's 9.0%
  • PEG 0.03 vs UMC's 3.05
  • 33.0% revenue growth vs GFS's 0.6%
  • Lower P/E (0.8x vs 38.5x)
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
The Defensive Pick

GFS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.85, Low D/E 13.7%, current ratio 2.62x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTSM logoTSM33.0% revenue growth vs GFS's 0.6%
ValueTSM logoTSMLower P/E (0.8x vs 38.5x)
Quality / MarginsTSM logoTSM45.1% margin vs GFS's 13.0%
Stability / SafetyUMC logoUMCBeta 0.90 vs SKYT's 2.67, lower leverage
DividendsUMC logoUMC3.0% yield, vs TSM's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SKYT logoSKYT+356.0% vs GFS's +101.0%
Efficiency (ROA)SKYT logoSKYT21.8% ROA vs GFS's 5.3%, ROIC -0.3% vs 5.3%

SKYT vs UMC vs TSM vs GFS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SKYTSkyWater Technology, Inc.
FY 2025
Wafer Services
73.7%$201M
Advanced Technology Services, Fixed Price
25.6%$70M
Advanced Technology Services, Other
0.7%$2M
UMCUnited Microelectronics Corporation
FY 2024
Wafer
95.5%$221.8B
Other Products
4.5%$10.5B
TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
FY 2024
Other Products
100.0%$379.8B
GFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
FY 2025
Engineering And Other Pre-Fabrication Services
100.0%$769M

SKYT vs UMC vs TSM vs GFS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTSMLAGGINGGFS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TSM is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.82T annually — 8637.4x SKYT's $442M. TSM is the more profitable business, keeping 45.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GFS's 13.0%. On growth, SKYT holds the edge at +126.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSKYT logoSKYTSkyWater Technolo…UMC logoUMCUnited Microelect…TSM logoTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…GFS logoGFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$442M$240.7B$3.82T$6.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$37M$106.8B$2.79T$2.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$119M$50.1B$1.72T$885M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$53M$50.1B$1.02T$1.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+20.0%+29.6%+59.9%+25.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.4%+18.9%+50.8%+11.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+26.9%+20.8%+45.1%+13.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-12.0%+20.8%+26.7%+14.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+126.6%+5.5%+21.6%0.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-10.3%+109.7%+42.0%+127.3%
TSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

UMC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 13.5x trailing earnings, SKYT trades at a 70% valuation discount to GFS's 44.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TSM offers better value at 1.40x vs UMC's 3.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSKYT logoSKYTSkyWater Technolo…UMC logoUMCUnited Microelect…TSM logoTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…GFS logoGFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES I…
Market CapShares × price$1.6B$37.8B$2.15T$39.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.9B$36.2B$2.09T$39.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.55x28.43x38.76x44.61x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.22x0.83x38.50x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.90x1.40x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple53.69x10.95x24.71x18.61x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.68x4.99x17.48x5.81x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share8.22x3.12x12.35x3.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.60x61.30x39.11x
UMC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TSM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

SKYT delivers a 93.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $94 in annual profit, vs $8 for GFS. GFS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKYT's 1.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSM scores 8/9 vs SKYT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSKYT logoSKYTSkyWater Technolo…UMC logoUMCUnited Microelect…TSM logoTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…GFS logoGFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+93.8%+13.5%+31.6%+7.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+21.8%+8.8%+21.8%+5.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.3%+10.0%+42.7%+5.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.4%+9.0%+33.0%+5.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92587
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.28x0.16x0.18x0.14x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$227M-$50.9B-$1.77T-$171M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$23M$110.7B$2.76T$1.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$250M$59.8B$990.4B$1.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.99x37.36x315.91x
TSM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TSM five years ago would be worth $36,269 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,287 for GFS. Over the past 12 months, SKYT leads with a +356.0% total return vs GFS's +101.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSM at 70.1% vs GFS's 5.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSKYT logoSKYTSkyWater Technolo…UMC logoUMCUnited Microelect…TSM logoTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…GFS logoGFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+47.4%+93.4%+29.9%+92.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+356.0%+109.4%+139.1%+101.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+243.3%+103.8%+391.9%+18.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+63.3%+81.3%+262.7%+52.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+86.4%+895.3%+1739.7%+52.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+50.9%+26.8%+70.1%+5.9%
TSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — UMC and TSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

UMC is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKYT's 2.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSM currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs SKYT's 91.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSKYT logoSKYTSkyWater Technolo…UMC logoUMCUnited Microelect…TSM logoTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…GFS logoGFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.67x0.90x1.91x1.85x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$36.27$15.45$420.00$76.37
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.02$6.56$171.37$31.51
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.2%+98.1%+98.6%+92.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.479.668.980.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M9.9M13.3M4.2M
Evenly matched — UMC and TSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — UMC and TSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SKYT as "Hold", UMC as "Hold", TSM as "Buy", GFS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for SKYT (target: $35) vs -43.3% for UMC (target: $9). For income investors, UMC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.03% vs TSM's 0.70%.

MetricSKYT logoSKYTSkyWater Technolo…UMC logoUMCUnited Microelect…TSM logoTSMTaiwan Semiconduc…GFS logoGFSGLOBALFOUNDRIES I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$35.00$8.60$427.50$51.14
# AnalystsCovering analysts6152519
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.0%+0.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises205
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$14.41$90.94
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — UMC and TSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TSM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UMC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallTaiwan Semiconductor Manufa… (TSM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SKYT vs UMC vs TSM vs GFS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SKYT or UMC or TSM or GFS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the stronger pick with 33.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 6% for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS). SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SKYT or UMC or TSM or GFS?

On trailing P/E, SkyWater Technology, Inc.

(SKYT) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. at 44. 6x. On forward P/E, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited is actually cheaper at 0. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited wins at 0. 03x versus United Microelectronics Corporation's 3. 05x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SKYT or UMC or TSM or GFS?

Over the past 5 years, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) delivered a total return of +262.

7%, compared to +52. 9% for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSM returned +1740% versus GFS's +52. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SKYT or UMC or TSM or GFS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

90β versus SkyWater Technology, Inc. 's 2. 67β — meaning SKYT is approximately 197% more volatile than UMC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 128% for SkyWater Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SKYT or UMC or TSM or GFS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is pulling ahead at 33.

0% versus 0. 6% for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SkyWater Technology, Inc. grew EPS 1843% year-over-year, compared to -10. 7% for United Microelectronics Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKYT leads at 27. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SKYT or UMC or TSM or GFS?

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the more profitable company, earning 45.

1% net margin versus 13. 0% for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSM leads at 50. 8% versus -0. 3% for SKYT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TSM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SKYT or UMC or TSM or GFS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 03x versus United Microelectronics Corporation's 3. 05x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) trades at 0. 8x forward P/E versus 38. 5x for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. — 37. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKYT: 5. 9% to $35. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SKYT or UMC or TSM or GFS?

In this comparison, UMC (3.

0% yield), TSM (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SKYT, GFS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SKYT or UMC or TSM or GFS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

90), 3. 0% yield, +895. 3% 10Y return). SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) carries a higher beta of 2. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UMC: +895. 3%, SKYT: +86. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SKYT and UMC and TSM and GFS?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SKYT is a small-cap high-growth stock; UMC is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; TSM is a mega-cap high-growth stock; GFS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. UMC, TSM pay a dividend while SKYT, GFS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SKYT

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 63%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UMC

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TSM

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GFS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SKYT and UMC and TSM and GFS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SKYT: 126.6% · UMC: 5.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(SKYT: 26.9% · UMC: 20.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SKYT: 13.5x · UMC: 28.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.