Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SLE vs HOFV vs MSGE vs SKLZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
SLE vs HOFV vs MSGE vs SKLZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment | Entertainment | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $37M | $2M | $3.15B | $109M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12M | $17M | $1.16B | $104M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3.57B | $-63M | $42M | $-70M |
| Gross Margin | 93.7% | 63.0% | 31.5% | 87.5% |
| Operating Margin | -264.7% | -158.0% | 10.1% | -68.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 56.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $5M | $249M | $1.20B | $129M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $432K | $43M | $195M |
SLE vs HOFV vs MSGE vs SKLZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Super League Enterp… (SLE) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Madison Square Gard… (MSGE) | 100 | 84.2 | -15.8% |
| Skillz Inc. (SKLZ) | 100 | 3.4 | -96.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLE vs HOFV vs MSGE vs SKLZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.57
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, current ratio 0.54x
- Beta 0.57, current ratio 0.54x
- Beta 0.57 vs SKLZ's 2.57
HOFV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MSGE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -24.6% 10Y total return vs SKLZ's -96.5%
- 3.6% margin vs SLE's -309.0%
- +83.6% vs SLE's -97.5%
- 1.8% ROA vs SLE's -410.7%, ROIC 8.5% vs -358.2%
SKLZ is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.5%, EPS growth -67.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -27.1%
- 9.5% revenue growth vs SLE's -35.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% revenue growth vs SLE's -35.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.6% margin vs SLE's -309.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs SKLZ's 2.57 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.6% vs SLE's -97.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.8% ROA vs SLE's -410.7%, ROIC 8.5% vs -358.2% |
SLE vs HOFV vs MSGE vs SKLZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SLE vs HOFV vs MSGE vs SKLZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSGE leads in 3 of 6 categories
HOFV leads 1 • SLE leads 0 • SKLZ leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSGE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSGE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 100.2x SLE's $12M. MSGE is the more profitable business, keeping 3.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLE's -309.0%. On growth, MSGE holds the edge at +59.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12M | $17M | $1.2B | $104M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2.5B | -$10M | $245M | -$70M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3.6B | -$63M | $42M | -$70M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$11M | $289M | -$70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.7% | +63.0% | +31.5% | +87.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -264.7% | -158.0% | +10.1% | -68.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -309.0% | -3.7% | +3.6% | -67.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -89.3% | -64.5% | +25.0% | -67.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.3% | -33.3% | +59.4% | +53.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.9% | -2.0% | -123.5% | -24.7% |
Valuation Metrics
HOFV leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $37M | $2M | $3.2B | $109M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $251M | $4.3B | $43M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.78x | -0.04x | 86.64x | -1.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 56.83x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 23.97x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.31x | 0.11x | 3.35x | 1.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 220.35x | 0.03x | — | 0.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 33.88x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSGE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSGE delivers a 7.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-3 for SLE. SKLZ carries lower financial leverage with a 1.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLE's 29.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSGE scores 6/9 vs HOFV's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.3% | -2.1% | +7.7% | -52.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -410.7% | -17.6% | +1.8% | -21.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.6% | -6.7% | +8.5% | -148.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | -7.9% | +11.0% | -34.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 29.26x | 3.45x | — | 1.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $249M | $1.2B | -$66M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $432,174 | $43M | $195M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $249M | $1.2B | $129M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.53x | -1.04x | 4.43x | -7.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSGE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSGE five years ago would be worth $7,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1 for SLE. Over the past 12 months, MSGE leads with a +83.6% total return vs SLE's -97.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSGE at 24.9% vs SLE's -90.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -48.2% | 0.0% | +22.8% | +58.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.5% | -50.0% | +83.6% | +34.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -95.0% | +94.8% | -42.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.5% | -26.2% | -97.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.8% | -24.6% | -96.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -90.7% | -63.1% | +24.9% | -16.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOFV and MSGE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOFV is the less volatile stock with a -0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKLZ's 2.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSGE currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs SLE's 2.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | -0.48x | 0.94x | 2.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $196.80 | $0.90 | $69.86 | $20.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.22 | $0.24 | $35.31 | $2.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.1% | +38.9% | +95.5% | +34.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 43.5 | 67.6 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 0 | 312K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MSGE as "Buy", SKLZ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 931.5% upside for SKLZ (target: $72) vs -0.6% for MSGE (target: $66).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $66.29 | $72.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 12 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.3% | +8.5% |
MSGE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HOFV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SLE vs HOFV vs MSGE vs SKLZ: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLE or HOFV or MSGE or SKLZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Skillz Inc.
(SKLZ) is the stronger pick with 9. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 5% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. (SLE). Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE) offers the better valuation at 86. 6x trailing P/E (56. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SLE or HOFV or MSGE or SKLZ?
Over the past 5 years, Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
(MSGE) delivered a total return of -26. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. (SLE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSGE returned -24. 6% versus SLE's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SLE or HOFV or MSGE or SKLZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
48β versus Skillz Inc. 's 2. 57β — meaning SKLZ is approximately -636% more volatile than HOFV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skillz Inc. (SKLZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 115% versus 29% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SLE or HOFV or MSGE or SKLZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Skillz Inc.
(SKLZ) is pulling ahead at 9. 5% versus -35. 5% for Super League Enterprise, Inc. (SLE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Super League Enterprise, Inc. grew EPS 82. 8% year-over-year, compared to -74. 1% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HOFV leads at 25. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SLE or HOFV or MSGE or SKLZ?
Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
(MSGE) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 0% net margin versus -263. 4% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company — meaning it keeps 4. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSGE leads at 13. 0% versus -139. 9% for HOFV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKLZ leads at 87. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SLE or HOFV or MSGE or SKLZ more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKLZ: 931.
5% to $72. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — SLE or HOFV or MSGE or SKLZ?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is SLE or HOFV or MSGE or SKLZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
48)). Skillz Inc. (SKLZ) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOFV: -99. 8%, SKLZ: -96. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SLE and HOFV and MSGE and SKLZ?
These companies operate in different sectors (SLE (Communication Services) and HOFV (Communication Services) and MSGE (Communication Services) and SKLZ (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 29%
- Gross Margin > 18%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.