Trucking
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SLGB vs FWRD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
SLGB vs FWRD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Trucking | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $25M | $547M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16M | $2.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-60M | $-91M |
| Gross Margin | 34.2% | 23.1% |
| Operating Margin | -280.0% | 2.1% |
| Total Debt | $6K | $2.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $929.00 | $106M |
Quick Verdict: SLGB vs FWRD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLGB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.31
- Rev growth 815.0%, EPS growth -41.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, current ratio 0.23x
FWRD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -47.3% 10Y total return vs SLGB's -88.9%
- -3.7% margin vs SLGB's -382.5%
- +0.6% vs SLGB's -88.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 815.0% revenue growth vs FWRD's 0.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -3.7% margin vs SLGB's -382.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.31 vs FWRD's 2.28 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +0.6% vs SLGB's -88.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.3% ROA vs SLGB's -355.7% |
SLGB vs FWRD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SLGB vs FWRD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FWRD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FWRD is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 158.4x SLGB's $16M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -3.7% (FWRD) to -3.8% (SLGB). On growth, SLGB holds the edge at +106.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16M | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$44M | $206M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$60M | -$91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +23.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +2.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | -3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -57.7% | +1.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.1% | -5.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FWRD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25M | $547M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.83x | -4.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.28x | 0.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 35.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FWRD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FWRD delivers a -52.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-53 in annual profit, vs $-7672 for SLGB. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FWRD scores 5/9 vs SLGB's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7672.3% | -52.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.6% | -3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 13.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5,214 | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $929 | $106M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6,143 | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FWRD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FWRD five years ago would be worth $1,978 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,114 for SLGB. Over the past 12 months, FWRD leads with a +0.6% total return vs SLGB's -88.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FWRD at -42.8% vs SLGB's -51.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -56.8% | -31.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -88.9% | +0.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.9% | -81.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.9% | -80.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.9% | -47.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.9% | -42.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLGB and FWRD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLGB is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FWRD's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FWRD currently trades 53.4% from its 52-week high vs SLGB's 9.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.31x | 2.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.08 | $32.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.50 | $14.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.7% | +53.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 25.7 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 421K | 733K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $37.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% |
FWRD leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
SLGB vs FWRD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLGB or FWRD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB) is the stronger pick with 815.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 8% for Forward Air Corporation (FWRD). Analysts rate Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) a "Hold" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SLGB or FWRD?
Over the past 5 years, Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) delivered a total return of -80.
2%, compared to -88. 9% for Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FWRD returned -47. 3% versus SLGB's -88. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SLGB or FWRD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
31β versus Forward Air Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning FWRD is approximately 74% more volatile than SLGB relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SLGB or FWRD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB) is pulling ahead at 815.
0% versus 0. 8% for Forward Air Corporation (FWRD). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SLGB or FWRD?
Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) is the more profitable company, earning -4.
3% net margin versus -172. 1% for Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps -4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FWRD leads at 1. 5% versus -34. 5% for SLGB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLGB leads at 28. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SLGB or FWRD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SLGB or FWRD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Smart Logistics Global Limited Ordinary Shares (SLGB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Forward Air Corporation (FWRD) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLGB: -88. 9%, FWRD: -47. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SLGB and FWRD?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLGB is a small-cap high-growth stock; FWRD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.