Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SLGL vs DERM vs PRGO vs VYNE vs SKIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
Household & Personal Products
SLGL vs DERM vs PRGO vs VYNE vs SKIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Household & Personal Products |
| Market Cap | $194M | $102M | $1.61B | $29M | $118M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $56M | $4.18B | $570K | $296M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $-9M | $-1.82B | $-26M | $-6M |
| Gross Margin | -153.5% | 67.5% | 34.2% | 99.1% | 64.9% |
| Operating Margin | -256.2% | -12.2% | -4.1% | -52.2% | -3.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 69.0x | 5.6x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $991K | $26M | $3.97B | $0.00 | $379M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $20M | $532M | $24M | $233M |
SLGL vs DERM vs PRGO vs VYNE vs SKIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sol-Gel Technologie… (SLGL) | 100 | 92.1 | -7.9% |
| Journey Medical Cor… (DERM) | 100 | 63.2 | -36.8% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 31.9 | -68.1% |
| VYNE Therapeutics I… (VYNE) | 100 | 3.6 | -96.4% |
| The Beauty Health C… (SKIN) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLGL vs DERM vs PRGO vs VYNE vs SKIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLGL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 68.0%, EPS growth -478.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 70.9%
- 68.0% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1%
- +8.0% vs PRGO's -51.2%
DERM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -47.4% 10Y total return vs SLGL's -49.0%
PRGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
VYNE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.74
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, current ratio 12.53x
- Beta 0.74, current ratio 12.53x
- Beta 0.74 vs SKIN's 2.00
SKIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- -2.0% margin vs VYNE's -46.5%
- -1.2% ROA vs VYNE's -63.3%, ROIC -6.8% vs -124.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 68.0% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.0% margin vs VYNE's -46.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs SKIN's 2.00 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.0% vs PRGO's -51.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.2% ROA vs VYNE's -63.3%, ROIC -6.8% vs -124.0% |
SLGL vs DERM vs PRGO vs VYNE vs SKIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SLGL vs DERM vs PRGO vs VYNE vs SKIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SKIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRGO leads 1 • SLGL leads 1 • DERM leads 0 • VYNE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 7330.5x VYNE's $570,000. SKIN is the more profitable business, keeping -2.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VYNE's -46.5%. On growth, SLGL holds the edge at +8.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $56M | $4.2B | $570,000 | $296M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | -$3M | $58M | -$30M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | -$9M | -$1.8B | -$26M | -$6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$3M | $108M | -$33M | $29M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -153.5% | +67.5% | +34.2% | +99.1% | +64.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | -12.2% | -4.1% | -52.2% | -3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -15.5% | -43.5% | -46.5% | -2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | -4.8% | +2.6% | -58.1% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.1% | +1.0% | -7.2% | +54.8% | -6.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +132.2% | +5.9% | -56.4% | +57.1% | +38.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PRGO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKIN's 7331.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $194M | $102M | $1.6B | $29M | $118M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $184M | $108M | $5.1B | $5M | $264M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -31.61x | -6.94x | -1.14x | -1.09x | -5.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 68.97x | 5.56x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 7.42x | — | 7331.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9.99x | 1.82x | 0.38x | 50.53x | 0.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.49x | 5.09x | 0.55x | 1.04x | 2.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 704.54x | — | 11.12x | — | 3.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SKIN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SKIN delivers a -9.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-9 in annual profit, vs $-74 for VYNE. SLGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIN's 6.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLGL scores 7/9 vs VYNE's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.0% | -45.4% | -50.7% | -74.1% | -9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -33.7% | -10.8% | -19.8% | -63.3% | -1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -48.6% | -56.8% | +3.7% | -124.0% | -6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.0% | -34.2% | +4.3% | -74.5% | -4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 1.28x | 1.35x | — | 6.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | $5M | $3.4B | -$24M | $146M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $20M | $532M | $24M | $233M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $991,000 | $26M | $4.0B | $0 | $379M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.52x | -7.20x | — | 0.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SLGL and DERM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SLGL five years ago would be worth $7,289 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $103 for VYNE. Over the past 12 months, SLGL leads with a +800.8% total return vs PRGO's -51.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DERM at 44.7% vs VYNE's -57.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +65.0% | -32.9% | -13.5% | +16.1% | -35.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +800.8% | -28.1% | -51.2% | -50.8% | -35.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +93.2% | +203.0% | -58.1% | -92.2% | -91.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.1% | -47.4% | -60.1% | -99.0% | -92.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.0% | -47.4% | -77.7% | -100.0% | -91.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.5% | +44.7% | -25.2% | -57.3% | -56.4% |
Risk & Volatility
SLGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLGL is the less volatile stock with a -0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKIN's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLGL currently trades 71.0% from its 52-week high vs SKIN's 33.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.18x | 1.82x | 1.18x | 0.74x | 2.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $97.97 | $9.55 | $28.44 | $1.96 | $2.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.57 | $4.31 | $9.23 | $0.28 | $0.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.0% | +52.3% | +41.2% | +34.4% | +33.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.9 | 44.3 | 60.9 | 68.7 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 230K | 3.4M | 192K | 760K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SLGL as "Buy", DERM as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold", SKIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 135.0% upside for DERM (target: $12) vs -28.1% for SLGL (target: $50). PRGO is the only dividend payer here at 9.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.00 | $11.75 | $20.00 | — | $1.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 3 | 36 | — | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +9.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 10 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.15 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SKIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRGO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SLGL vs DERM vs PRGO vs VYNE vs SKIN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLGL or DERM or PRGO or VYNE or SKIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd.
(SLGL) is the stronger pick with 68. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). Analysts rate Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. (SLGL) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SLGL or DERM or PRGO or VYNE or SKIN?
Over the past 5 years, Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd.
(SLGL) delivered a total return of -27. 1%, compared to -99. 0% for VYNE Therapeutics Inc. (VYNE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DERM returned -47. 4% versus VYNE's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SLGL or DERM or PRGO or VYNE or SKIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd.
(SLGL) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 18β versus The Beauty Health Company's 2. 00β — meaning SKIN is approximately -1237% more volatile than SLGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. (SLGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 6% for The Beauty Health Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SLGL or DERM or PRGO or VYNE or SKIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd.
(SLGL) is pulling ahead at 68. 0% versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Beauty Health Company grew EPS 55. 6% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLGL leads at 70. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SLGL or DERM or PRGO or VYNE or SKIN?
The Beauty Health Company (SKIN) is the more profitable company, earning -3.
2% net margin versus -46. 5% for VYNE Therapeutics Inc. — meaning it keeps -3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRGO leads at 8. 1% versus -52. 2% for VYNE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLGL leads at 99. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SLGL or DERM or PRGO or VYNE or SKIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
6x forward P/E versus 69. 0x for Journey Medical Corporation — 63. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DERM: 135. 0% to $11. 75.
07Which pays a better dividend — SLGL or DERM or PRGO or VYNE or SKIN?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield) pays a dividend. SLGL, DERM, VYNE, SKIN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is SLGL or DERM or PRGO or VYNE or SKIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd.
(SLGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 18)). The Beauty Health Company (SKIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLGL: -49. 0%, SKIN: -91. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SLGL and DERM and PRGO and VYNE and SKIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (SLGL (Healthcare) and DERM (Healthcare) and PRGO (Healthcare) and VYNE (Healthcare) and SKIN (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SLGL is a small-cap high-growth stock; DERM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; VYNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SKIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PRGO pays a dividend while SLGL, DERM, VYNE, SKIN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.