Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SLGN vs CCK vs SEE vs AMBP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
SLGN vs CCK vs SEE vs AMBP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $4.25B | $11.35B | $6.21B | $2.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.58B | $12.37B | $5.36B | $5.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $283M | $737M | $506M | $11M |
| Gross Margin | 17.4% | 18.3% | 29.8% | 10.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.8% | 13.2% | 13.5% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 10.6x | 12.5x | 12.4x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $4.62B | $6.17B | $4.10B | $4.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.08B | $879M | $344M | $522M |
SLGN vs CCK vs SEE vs AMBP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) | 100 | 109.5 | +9.5% |
| Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) | 100 | 131.6 | +31.6% |
| Sealed Air Corporat… (SEE) | 100 | 108.3 | +8.3% |
| Ardagh Metal Packag… (AMBP) | 100 | 39.2 | -60.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLGN vs CCK vs SEE vs AMBP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.0%
- Beta 0.66, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.22x
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 12.4x)
- 2.0% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs AMBP's 11.1%
CCK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 98.0% 10Y total return vs SLGN's 80.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, current ratio 1.03x
- PEG 0.82 vs SEE's 9.73
SEE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.
- 9.4% margin vs AMBP's 0.2%
- Beta 0.32 vs AMBP's 0.81
- +44.2% vs SLGN's -23.7%
- 7.1% ROA vs AMBP's 0.2%, ROIC 11.2% vs 6.5%
AMBP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 59.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
- 12.0% revenue growth vs SEE's -0.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.0% revenue growth vs SEE's -0.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 12.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs AMBP's 0.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs AMBP's 0.81 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs AMBP's 11.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.2% vs SLGN's -23.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs AMBP's 0.2%, ROIC 11.2% vs 6.5% |
SLGN vs CCK vs SEE vs AMBP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SLGN vs CCK vs SEE vs AMBP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SEE leads in 2 of 6 categories
AMBP leads 1 • CCK leads 1 • SLGN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCK is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.4B annually — 2.3x SEE's $5.4B. SEE is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMBP's 0.2%. On growth, AMBP holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.6B | $12.4B | $5.4B | $5.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $966M | $2.1B | $965M | $753M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $283M | $737M | $506M | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $307M | $1.1B | $459M | $209M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.4% | +18.3% | +29.8% | +10.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +13.2% | +13.5% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +6.0% | +9.4% | +0.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +8.9% | +8.6% | +3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.5% | +7.7% | +2.1% | +18.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | -56.6% | +16.4% | +58.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AMBP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, SEE trades at a 22% valuation discount to CCK's 15.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CCK offers better value at 1.05x vs SEE's 9.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $11.3B | $6.2B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.8B | $16.6B | $10.0B | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.91x | 15.85x | 12.29x | -214.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.60x | 12.46x | 12.38x | 15.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.05x | 9.66x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.97x | 7.96x | 14.33x | 8.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.66x | 0.92x | 1.16x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.89x | 3.36x | 5.02x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.07x | 10.34x | 13.54x | 8.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CCK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEE delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $12 for SLGN. CCK carries lower financial leverage with a 1.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEE's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLGN scores 8/9 vs SEE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.5% | +21.8% | +48.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +5.2% | +7.1% | +0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +14.1% | +11.2% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +16.0% | +14.1% | +6.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.03x | 1.77x | 3.31x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.5B | $5.3B | $3.8B | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $879M | $344M | $522M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.6B | $6.2B | $4.1B | $4.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.36x | 4.00x | 1.95x | 1.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SEE and AMBP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SLGN five years ago would be worth $10,137 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,388 for AMBP. Over the past 12 months, SEE leads with a +44.2% total return vs SLGN's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMBP at 10.4% vs SLGN's -3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.9% | -2.6% | +2.0% | -2.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.7% | +5.3% | +44.2% | +20.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.1% | +23.5% | +2.4% | +34.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.4% | -6.9% | -19.1% | -46.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.8% | +98.0% | +4.4% | -44.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.8% | +7.3% | +0.8% | +10.4% |
Risk & Volatility
SEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMBP's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEE currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs SLGN's 70.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 0.48x | 0.32x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.04 | $116.62 | $44.27 | $5.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.15 | $89.21 | $28.15 | $3.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.6% | +86.7% | +95.2% | +78.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.1 | 46.9 | 64.0 | 46.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 769K | 984K | 3.0M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SLGN and AMBP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SLGN as "Buy", CCK as "Buy", SEE as "Buy", AMBP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for SLGN (target: $51) vs 3.2% for SEE (target: $44). For income investors, AMBP offers the higher dividend yield at 11.08% vs CCK's 1.03%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.50 | $120.50 | $43.50 | $4.52 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 25 | 27 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.0% | +1.9% | +11.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 21 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.80 | $1.04 | $0.81 | $0.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +4.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SEE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). AMBP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SLGN vs CCK vs SEE vs AMBP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLGN or CCK or SEE or AMBP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ardagh Metal Packaging S.
A. (AMBP) is the stronger pick with 12. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 6% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLGN or CCK or SEE or AMBP?
On trailing P/E, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus Crown Holdings, Inc. at 15. 8x. On forward P/E, Silgan Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Crown Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 82x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLGN or CCK or SEE or AMBP?
Over the past 5 years, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) delivered a total return of +1. 4%, compared to -46. 1% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. (AMBP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCK returned +98. 0% versus AMBP's -44. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLGN or CCK or SEE or AMBP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
32β versus Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. 's 0. 81β — meaning AMBP is approximately 150% more volatile than SEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 177% versus 3% for Sealed Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLGN or CCK or SEE or AMBP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardagh Metal Packaging S.
A. (AMBP) is pulling ahead at 12. 0% versus -0. 6% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sealed Air Corporation grew EPS 89. 5% year-over-year, compared to 4. 7% for Silgan Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMBP leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLGN or CCK or SEE or AMBP?
Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
4% net margin versus 0. 2% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEE leads at 13. 5% versus 5. 0% for AMBP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEE leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLGN or CCK or SEE or AMBP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLGN: 25. 4% to $50. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLGN or CCK or SEE or AMBP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. (AMBP) offers the highest yield at 11. 1%, versus 1. 0% for Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK).
09Is SLGN or CCK or SEE or AMBP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
32), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEE: +4. 4%, AMBP: -44. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLGN and CCK and SEE and AMBP?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLGN is a small-cap deep-value stock; CCK is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SEE is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMBP is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.